Marco Rubio endorses Mitt Romney (RINO Spring migration continues)

TPM Livewire ^ | 09:33 PM EST 03/28/2012 | Sara Libby

[Josh Painter]

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio endorsed Mitt Romney for president Tuesday night on Sean Hannity's show on Fox News.

"I am gonna endorse Mitt Romney. He offers such a start contrast to the president's record," the senator said.

"I have zero doubt in my mind: No. 1 that he will govern as a conservative, and No. 2 that he will be head and shoulders above the president in the White House right now."

On rumors he's on the short list to be vice president, Rubio said,"I don't believe I'm going to be asked ... that's not what I want."

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

You need to put up or shut up! What is a RINO? Illegally establishing homosexual marriage? Teaching homosexuality to elementary school children? Homosexuals in the military? Government health care mandates? Global warming alarmism? Cap & trade? Supporting radical gun control? Supporting Roe v. Wade? Taxpayerfunded abortions? Yes, these are positions Romney has a RECORD of supporting. And by the way, Romney said he opposed Reagan and was an independent.

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

WHY DO WE HAVE TO CONVERT A REPUBLICAN NOMINEE? Romney’s record is Democrat across the board.

[Kansas58]

You have a problem with reality.
It might well be Obama or Romney.
That might be our choice.
It is our own fault, as even the conservatives here can't help but trash either Gingrich or Santorum, on a daily basis.
Any 3rd Party stupidity is just surrender to Obama.
Obama can get us all killed, rather quickly.
That kind of trumps all the other issues that I care about.

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

Precisely, I not supporting Romney. I will not back a candidate that instituted homosexual marriage. Romney has no regard for the 2nd amemdment, his record is atrocious..you give up that right all is lost. Bring up Willard’s record and they lose the ability to speak.

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

Don’t play fast and loose with me, because last I checked Romney doesn’t have enough delegates. A brokered convention is very possible. Tell me why I should give the secondment right to bear arms for Obama or Romney..or any other man?

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

Don’t play fast and loose with me, because last I checked Romney doesn’t have enough delegates. A brokered convention is very possible. Tell me why I should give the secondment right to bear arms for Obama or Romney..or any other man?

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

Don’t play fast and loose with me, because last I checked Romney doesn’t have enough delegates. A brokered convention is very possible. Tell me why I should give the secondment right to bear arms for Obama or Romney..or any other man?

[Kansas58]

I am telling you to prepare for the real possibility that Romney will face Obama in November.
In that case?
Romney will be better, on every issue, than Obama.

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

And I’m telling you to prepare for the fact that on global warming, cap & trade, gun control, abortion, homsexual marriage, government mandates, etc. that Willard and Hussein don’t have any difference and this McCain 2.0. Santorum made a great point that there’s no contrast.

[Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri]

And I’m telling you to prepare for the fact that on global warming, cap & trade, gun control, abortion, homsexual marriage, government mandates, etc. that Willard and Hussein don’t have any difference and this McCain 2.0. Santorum made a great point that there’s no contrast.

[sand88]

You already know every move Romney will make before he wins,marvelous.

Based on his actual record mitt will go out of his way to screw Conservatives. Mitt would do nothing to turn our Republic around. He will just be a liberal placeholder under the next real liberal takes power.

Mitt will NEVER get my vote. It is sad how people think anybody but Obama.

That position is an insult to our Founders. I revere our Constitution and will NOT betray it by supporting someone who has contempt for it (I am talking about mitt)

I pray mitt and the rest of the gop-e are thrown onto the ash heap of history, where they rightfully belong.

mitt worships at the alter of State Power. He has absolutely no interest in reigning in government.

[sand88]

It is our job to convert Romney to the conservative cause.

thanks for the laugh -lol. mitt's main objective if he gains power is the utterly screw Conservatives. It's in mitt's dna to always believe State Power is the right choice for solving problems.

Mitt and his underlings will get their only real joy from putting the screws to Conservatives at every turn.

[sand88]

And I’m telling you to prepare for the fact that on global warming, cap & trade, gun control, abortion, homsexual marriage, government mandates, etc. that Willard and Hussein don’t have any difference and this McCain 2.0.

You have exactly expressed the reality of mitt. He will rightfully get slaughtered in Nov.

I still sincerely believe he will not be our nominee. If he is, my tagline expresses my desire to vote for mitt :)

[entropy12]

800 veto’s of Mass. legislature bills, is only thing I know as being against liberals. That is more than Bushes, Reagan & Nixon & Ford combined.

[patriot08]

What do all you Rubio worshippers think now?

[Right_in_Virginia]

You want God to help us, reject what you know is wrong and face the consequences, as they will be GENTLER than voting for an agent of ALL THAT GOD DESPISES.

I reject Obama. You?

[neocon1984]

Ironically, your tent is so big that...

It only needs to be big enought to win and end the socialist mandates you spoke of.

[G Larry]

So, cast a ballot for Obama, or support him by staying home.
You deserve what you get.

There is no such “evidence”, that would ever satisfy you.
In fact I voted for Santorum in the caucus.

I’d like to construct my own Gingrich/Reagan clone.

But back here in the real world, the only current option to beat Obama and save America from destruction, is to vote for Romney and Pray for America.

[AlwaysFrosty]

You are right! For the guy who called me a “noobie troll” (obviously hasn’t read any other of my posts) I voted for Newt in my primary, but the writing is on the wall concerning the repub nomination. The battle has been fought, the game has been played, but now it is time to work the main event...beating Obama.
I cannot believe the high and mighty attitude of people who say they won’t cast a vote. Our current president is so incredibly dangerous to freedom that to stay home and not vote is unthinkable. Mittens was not my choice, has not been my choice, wish it could be someone else, but it is what it is. The current president needs defeated and if any of you are not in support of that then what is the point? Has free republic just become “bitchin” republic?

Those of you who don’t want to vote is it really worth the chance of giving our current POTUS another term? So, go ahead and don’t vote, and when gas is hitting $10/gal, food prices escalate through the roof, electricity becomes rationed, and wall street takes a nose dive we can thank all of you who not only decided to stay home, but refused to get in the fight for freedom.
This primary process (and the 2010 election) has challenged the repub establishment waaaaay beyond anything they have yet faced, and we can keep up the pressure to bring changes. Don’t stay home people, don’t give up the fight, or you will be giving up on America. You are better than that!

And really...is name calling necessary at Free Republic? You who engage in that type of discourse are no different than the those libs who say they are tolerant but are anything but.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Not voting for Romney does not mean I am voting for Obama.

-

Not voting for Romney in the primary, means you have a brain.

If despite all best efforts we're stuck with Romney and Obama as the choice in the general election, not voting for Romney means you're voting for Obama.

Yes. It means exactly that.