Posted on 03/23/2012 1:05:00 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
Herman Cain's wife never referred to Kenya as Herman's "home country." Maybe Michelle didn't mean to say "home country." But it's a little odd that she did.
During his candidacy, no one doubted that Jesse Jackson was born in a house in South Carolina. Most candidates have living witnesses of their births. Obama had none (except his paternal grandmother).
The Daily Kos did not somehow get the sealed birth certificate of Alan Keyes and post it online during his campaign. Yet, mysteriously, somehow the liberal website posted Obama's "birth certificate" in early 2008.
At least, we were told that it was Obama's birth certificate. We were told for over three years that Hawaii had no other birth certificate. According to the fact-checking sites, the "long form" was a conservative myth which simply did not exist in the Hawaii archives. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs assured us that the "birth certificate" was "right there online."
So it was a little strange when a long-form birth certificate appeared out of nowhere on April 27, 2011 -- on the eve of Jerome Corsi's Where's the Birth Certificate? book release and in the midst of Donald Trump's table-pounding campaign over the bizarre secrecy of Barack Hussein Obama II.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
FYI Butter
Ad guy you are mentioned in her post.
Yes, what about all those videos I've seen of Obama talking about transparency?
Time to break out the unknown bonafides list again:
President Obama, will you finally come clean on your hidden records? We want to know why these questions are off limits?
1. The Original Birth Certificate - Yes, the absolute original, examined and certified by three independent forensic experts.
2. Please produce your Columbia University transcripts.
3. Please, your original Columbia thesis paper.
4. Please produce your Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5. Please produce your Harvard University transcripts.
6. Please produce your Illinois State Senate records including your voting record.
7. Please produce your Illinois State Senate schedule.
8. Please produce your Law practice client list and billing records/summary.
9. Please produce the locations and names of all half-siblings and stepmother.
10. Your complete Medical Records (we've only seen the one page summary released so far). Have you had drug tests done? Are you still using coke? Please, your liver function tests to clarify alcohol abuse. Have you had an AIDS test?
11. Please produce your Occidental College Transcripts. Also, any records of student aid received and under what names(s) and nationality.
12. Please show us your Parents original Marriage Certificate.
13. Please produce your record of Baptism.
14. Please produce your Selective Service registration records (Did you actually Register for Selective Service? Why is the 19 missing from the date stamp? Why is the date of the stamp earlier than the date of the person's signature?) Also, why does your Social Security number, 042-68-4425, not pass E-verify?
15. Please provide us with schedules for all trips outside of the United States before 2007.
16. Please produce all Passport records for all passports, US and otherwise - before the scrubbing.
17. Can you show us a list of your scholarly articles?
18. Your SAT and LSAT test scores please. Did you even take the SAT and LSAT?
19. What's with no access to your grandmother in Kenya?
20. Please list of all campaign workers that currently are lobbyists.
21. Please produce Punahou grade school records.
22. Why are Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education?
23. Please produce page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.
24. Why did you, President Barack Obama, resign from the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?
25. Why did Michelle Obama resign from the Illinois bar after only about four years of practice and where are all of the relevant documents?
Why are these records hidden? Who are you President Obama? Will these records be revealed before November 6, 2012? We the People care about our country deeply and are very concerned about a POTUS who has hidden every scrap of information about his life.
The voting public deserves to know these answers. We have many more questions, but please answer these first to show your transparency and good faith. We'll keep passing this list on until we get some answers.
What else is he hiding and Why?
Two other points and I'll cease and desist:
I think the author hit a big point when he said, "Another basis for the conservative establishment's fear is the idea that maybe Obama is setting the "birthers" up. . We need to reorient our thinking on this issue." He's right. Bring it on, come hell or high water.
Also, We knew who Ike was. . .
It is amazing to me that anyone following the irregularities in Obama’s murky past won't get a headache trying to formulate new “explanations” every other day. Doesn't it get tiring for you?
Thank you! I thought I had searched under both advertiser guy and advertising guy. I’m glad I found you again, advertising guy. If there are any other insights you might have about the media, based on what you saw at Arpaio’s presser, I would sure love to hear them. =)
“People make date mistakes all the time.”
The list of mistakes when it comes Obama’s records is incredible.
1. 2 digit stamp put into stamp. Even though another stamp on another selective document from the same post office shows the standard 4 digits.
2. The Social Security number with the Connecticut prefix. Supposedly because it is one digit off from Hawaii and the Social Security office made a typo error.
3. The time/date stamp in the EXIF data of the original Fact Check photos of the COLB. Jess Henig and Joe Miller state that the battery failed in the Canon AS570 camera resulting a date that was only 2 day prior to the last passport break-in.
4. The missing page (page 11) in the Obama Senior/Stanley Ann Dunham divorce papers.
5. The destruction of Stanly Ann Dunham passport records in clear violation of State Department policy.
6. The missing immigration archives for the First week of August 1961 as reported in the Sheriff Arpio briefing.
7. Obama Senior age identified as 25 on the LFBC even though he was 27 at the time of birth. INS records clearly state his birth date to be June 1934 AND he used that date in his own handwriting in INS forms from 1959-1961. This included the INS form he filled out in late August 1961. Only in 1962 and later did he use the 1936 date.
8. The statistical value of ‘9’ handwritten in Fathers Race field of the LFBC. This is coorisponds to the statistical recording value of ‘Not Stated’. The correct value should have been ‘2’ if Fathers Race was ‘African’.
9. Brian Schatz mistakenly omitted the eligibility language in the Hawaii candidate nomination form in 2008 - even though he used the same template as in 2004 that DID include the language. Well, maybe that was not a ‘mistake’.
10. Michelle Obama mistakenly said Stanly Ann Dunham was ‘very young and very single’ when she had Obama.
Once is anomaly, twice is coincidence, 3 times is a pattern. This is beyond ‘pattern’ at this point.
IMO they would be jumping all over each other to report it if they could find “proof” or a fact supported witness. It is very possible that they are all searching just like we freepers, searching for a smoking gun, keeping notes but keeping quiet (not letting others know what they know)
Even FR has it’s back door, smokey rooms, FRmail vaults.
You're right. I couldn't possibly compete with his experienced ignorance.
Why are we standing on the Capitol steps today? That number 19 when you have a nine you have a womb that is pregnant. And when you have a one standing by the nine, it means that theres something secret that has to be unfolded.
Very prescient, indeed. 0b0z0 is pregnant and da Wookie is blocking the view, although this "could" be considered a miracle. I don't see it that way, though. It's quite possible.
Exactly. Now if only more people would get on this and really press it. The list goes on and on.
thx for the ping
” I think the author hit a big point when he said, “Another basis for the conservative establishment’s fear is the idea that maybe Obama is setting the “birthers” up. . We need to reorient our thinking on this issue.” He’s right. Bring it on, come hell or high water.”
Not conservative establishment’s fear....RINO Establishment Fear
Not conservative establishments fear....RINO Establishment Fear.
You're right. It's RINO-E's problem, not ours. Would love for all the talkers to finally attack and 'come out' with the various lists of unanswered questions. What do they have to lose now? It's a cold war from now until November 6th. It's just our Sacred Constitutional Republic that's at stake here.
” What do they have to lose now? It’s a cold war from now until November 6th. It’s just our Sacred Constitutional Republic that’s at stake here.”
Their silence is deafening.....and indefencable, as well.
True and agree.
But in Fogbow land this must be a ‘mistake’ on her part since it is clear conflict with the narrative story. i.e. Michelle must have made a ‘speako’ error when she said it - and it another case of people ‘making mistakes’ when it comes the history of Obama.
There is so much evidence that the president has lied about his birth and other aspects of his personal history, that to NOT be a birther would be wacko.
Doesn't the MSM know that the new standard for journalistic excellence is to be a birther? If they don't like birther, how about being a bonafider? Lets research those bonafides journolisters! How about it? Waiting. . .
USPO stood for United States Post Office. That was its official name up until 1970, when Congress "privatized" it and renamed it the United States Postal Service (USPS).
New stamps all said USPS on the bottom. But they kept using the old ones until they wore out.
Now put yourself in the forger's shoes. He needs a stamp. Either USPO or USPS will do. However, the ones lying around all say USPS and have those pesky 2000's year plugs.
Now, he might have got lucky and found an old USPO stamp. But that stamp would obviously have a 19xx year plug, wouldn't it?
At worst, he might have had to cut the year off of, say, a 1983 stamp and replace it with a flipped 08 from a current stamp. But, in that case, the 19 would show as it should.
********
This is mirse. I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you are trying to say above.
1. Are you saying that if Obama's Selective Service application was a fake, it should read "USPS" at the bottom instead of the "USPO" that we see, because the Postal Service changed its name in 1970 and no post office site in the country used "USPO" stamps in 1980?
2. That is, I don't understand why Obama's Selective Service form was stamped in Hawaii with a 1980 date and with the "USPO" stamp on the bottom, if the Postal Service changed its name in 1970 to United States Postal Service.
3. Shouldn't the bottom of Obama's form, if authentic, read "USPS" instead of "USPO" that we see, if it was indeed stamped on Jul 29, '80?
4.Also, do you have any samples of legitimate documents that have the "1980" date stamp with the "USPS"---United States Postal Service---on the bottom?
Thanks.
So let's see, the sitting POTUS, two candidates seeking the office of POTUS and numerous people with the possibility of being chosen as VPOTUS...all with issues regarding their status as natural born citizens being in question.
And all three branches of the government claiming ignorance and wishing it would all just "go away".
We surely live in interesting times with a supposedly incurious populace and watchdog media.
Hmmmmmm...how will it all turn out?
Will more racial unrest be revealed? Will monetary policies cause further dilemmas? Will the can be kicked down the road yet again?
Tune in next week for the next exciting episode of "Modern Day Cliffhangers".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.