Posted on 03/08/2012 3:44:57 PM PST by Brown Deer
THE FRAUD AND DECEPTION CONTINUES!...
Unfortunately, the Judge ruled in favor of the State and effectively dismissed the Complaint.
Personally, I believe that this could be the result of the immense poisoning of vexatious and incompetent litigation that has plagued the Hawaiian court system, as this case should have been very easily won--if nothing but the law were considered. What other motivation could a state have for denying someone a photocopy of his deceased sister's original birth certificate? Developing . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com ...
Maybe we could get all the toilet paper companies to say they won’t sell to anybody in Hawaii.
Maybe we could refuse to hire any employees from Hawaii - because we can’t know whether or not their documents are real.
Obviously we could refuse to vacation there and make sure they know why.
What else could be done?
Turn off Hawaii Five-O? Though I don’t even know what it is because we don’t watch TV.
There has to be a way for the rest of the country to let Hawaii know that we don’t appreciate their treason.
Maybe we could reroute the Fast & Furious guns from Mexico to Hawaii.
Maybe we could send massive loads of teabags to that judge.
What could we do? Surely Cloward-Piven would have some ideas for how to punish them. How can we give them a dose of their own medicine?
Revoke their statehood?
Honestly, I don’t know a right answer for this.
If the mother is still alive, could they ammend the complaint with her name also ? Since she is party to the BC ( her name and signature being on it ), how can they deny her access since she is a legal party to the document ?
That’s what I had suggested they do when they appealed. But it seems pretty clear that HI doesn’t really care what their laws say. HRS 338-18(b) gives Duncan permission to receive a copy of the BC, and UIPA says that if law allows the disclosure of a government record, the agency HAS to disclose it. The government record is the actual paper document, and it is discloseable to Duncan so UIPA requires it to be disclosed. The director has no authority to refuse THAT requested document by replacing it with a different document.
Their judiciary is just rotten. If they do this with this request they would do the same with a request from Clara. And technically Virginia’s long-form DOES refer to Duncan, because it asked how many children had been born to Clara, and one of those children was Duncan.
Only a fool argues with a fool, which makes it really rough when your entire government is a fool. These jackasses are going to be the death of the greatest nation that this world has ever seen. I’m just sad that a lot of good people get stuck going down with the ship too. Like my kids. These crooks are stealing my kids’ future.
I have to keep telling myself that they will see justice one Day. There is a Judge who deals honestly, and they will not be able to wriggle their way out of justice when they meet Him face to face. All the excuses will melt on that Day and all that will be left is the naked truth. It’s just a matter of time.
I think the only medicine they’d pay attention to is whatever they (most likely) administered to Andrew Breitbart.
“What other motivation could a state have for denying someone a photocopy of his deceased sister’s original birth certificate? .....”
Patently obvious.
Are there index records that cover the issuance of BC #51 61 10641?
Is there a way to compel discovery or issuance of the index or the actual Virginia Sunhara BC?
Any relevant control or index information?
Maybe we could all send a roll of toilet paper to the Judge.
The HDOH claims that the handwritten index records were destroyed (without first getting permission for the destruction of those PERMANENT records) when the system was computerized.
The only way to compel discovery of ANYTHING is through a FEDERAL subpoena. That’s why the only way for us to have any semblance of the rule of law is by having Congress appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate and prosecute the crimes committed in regards to Obama’s official records.
That’s why I posted at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2856341/posts a plea for people to contact their Congress-critters and Issa’s office to demand hearings on this issue, which is what Arpaio knows we need to do. I was hoping that people with ping lists would ping their lists but unless they did it privately, nobody has.
People are giving up. But I think we need to realize what we are signing this country over to if we give up now. At the very beginning of this mess I was saying that it was a matter of the rule of law - that if we ceded this we would be ceding the rule of law. As we’ve watched the courts, media, Congress, law enforcement, military, etc all descend into lawlessness it is becoming increasingly clear to everybody that this really IS about the rule of law. But the clear evidence that we’re fighting for the very existence of civilized society is resulting in people saying it’s too late, rather than saying it’s time to sound the trumpet and let even the floozies who haven’t paid attention know what the stakes are.
Part of that is because we have to alert people in spite of the media that is working against the truth. But we still have ping lists. We still have e-mail contacts. We still have tweets. Those things will eventually be taken away too, so it is critical for us to get the word out BEFORE they take those things away too.
The people in Congress who want to be re-elected need to be FORCED to make a statement on whether the crimes for which a law enforcement body has found probable cause, regarding a matter of national and international significance, will be investigated by Congress. And whatever they say needs to be broadcast in ads against their re-election. If they will not stand for the rule of law the public needs to know that. The biggest question we’re facing is whether civilization as we know it will continue to exist, or whether our leaders are signing this nation over to lawlessness. Because there is an election coming up we can have these politicians by the balls, if we only have the courage and wisdom to step up now and do what has to be done.
There’s an idea. Maybe tell him we can smell him from Nebraska (or wherever we’re from). Great idea!
Come to think of it, maybe we could do the same to Malihi and the superior court judge in GA, as well as our Congress-critters if they say they will not stand for the rule of law. And while we’re at it, we could do the same for all the media companies.
Perhaps we could write “The Rule of Law” in marker on the outer layer of the TP (or unroll it as far as we like and write it all over) and say that we thought they needed this because we can smell them all the way from wherever we’re at.
Or maybe to save postage money we could have somebody collect names of people who would like to have a roll of “The Rule of Law” TP delivered to these people, and put a sticker on the end of the roll saying who it’s from. Then somebody could hand-deliver it for all of us.
It’s very odd how the director is given all this broad authority to LIMIT how the records can be released, even when there’s no compelling reason to limit the production of said records. People need to wake up tot he cover-up.
First Circuit Court
Rhonda Nishimura
Kaahumanu Hale
777 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu HI 96813
That’s a start. Unless we have somebody in HI who would be willing to deliver a bunch of TP rolls for us we’ll each have to spend the $5 to have them Fed-EX’ed.
If you want to be the one to hound an elderly woman for records of her daughter's death because you have a hunch that the President of the United States is using it in a massive coverup, be my guest.
Nobody’s talking about “hounding” someone. Seeing as her son is the plaintiff in the case, it was a obvious question that the son would be the one to do it.
Even if the son just has power-of-attorney for Clara, he could be representing her.
But they’re just totally ignoring UIPA, which governs ALL government records, including vital records, and allows the actual original record to be inspected or copied as long as disclosure to that person is not forbidden by law.
And the judge let them get away with it, without so much as an answer. So much like Malihi.
“How DARE you think that I have to answer to YOU, or to THE LAW!!!!”
Exact same kind of pompous jackassery that characterizes Obama and everybody in his administration. They consider themselves above the law. If we let them be above the law, there will be no stopping them from doing whatever they darn well please. Surely everybody has to be able to see that!
From what I read on the birther report, the papers filed only sourced the health department regulations as the authority for releasing the original copy, instead of the law which gives rights to a common descendant. The regulations only mention a common ancestor!!!! We need better, more thorough, lawyers on these cases!
-PJ
But they’re just totally ignoring UIPA, which governs ALL government records, including vital records, and allows the actual original record to be inspected or copied as long as disclosure to that person is not forbidden by law.
is there anything that can be done? is there any HI attorney to confront this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.