New Hampshire House of Representatives Members to Hold Press Conference on Obama’s Eligibility

Post & Email ^ | 1/2/2012 | Sharon Rondeau

[GregNH]

(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.

The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.

[chrisnj]

It would be wonderful if they can hold the conference where a R pres candidate is campaigning. Draw them in to force them to make comments.
If Mitt Romney is there, ask him if his father was naturalized to be US citizen prior to Mitt’s birth. (His father was born in Mexico! Even though he was born to US citizen parents, he was born in Mexico therefore he was subject to Mexican jurisdiction, i.e. not a US citizen!)

See, you say children born in US to foreign parents are US citizens. So children born in Mexico to US citizen parents are Mexican citizens!

[gunner03]

They should involve all the members of congress and every one else who failed to vet 0 . They failed our country and our Constitution. Throw all the bums out.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[azishot]

Happy New Year to you, too!

Let’s see if the LSM reports anything about this. I’m not going to hold my breath. They’ve been in “protection mode” for years.

[Jacquerie]

No court will boot Obama from a ballot. The Constitution places this political question, this responsibility on the State legislatures. It is up to NH and every other State to determine Hussein's (non)eligibility.

[chrisnj]

Can they get CSCAN to cover it?

[chrisnj]

Can they get CSPAN to cover it?

[afraidfortherepublic]

FTA:

“What we really need to do is emphasize that Barack Obama was not eligible and is not eligible to become president. At the Ballot Law hearing, the Commission and the Assistant Secretary of State said publicly, under oath, on the record, that their authority was only to see that the paperwork was properly filled out and that the $1,000 fee was paid. If you go back a little farther, you find out that they had disqualified a man named Sal Mohamed and another named Abdul Hassan. There are letters, of which we have copies, signed by Karen Ladd, the Assistant Secretary of State. So we applied for a rehearing, which was denied, and we applied to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and last week they denied us a hearing. We can provide complete copies of all of these challenges.”

[butterdezillion]

The people filing suit are NH legislators. The NH courts refused to hear the case.

What do you call that? And what do you call the people of NH if they are willing to accept that?

[butterdezillion]

The suit is to determine whether the SOS has to apply the same Constitutional scrutiny to Obama as was applied to the other candidates who filled out their paperwork properly and paid the fee and were STILL left off the ballot because they were Constitutionally ineligible because they were not natural born citizens.

This is all necessary because the NH SOS is claiming that they HAVE to put a candidate’s name on the ballot as long as they fill out the paperwork and pay the fee. But that’s not what they did with those other 2 candidates who were left off because they weren’t NBC.

IOW, we’ve got a state SOS that is denying equal protection, and the courts are refusing to allow the state legislators to keep their oath to uphold the US Constitution. Equal protection and due process are BOTH being trampled, as citizens are merely trying to get their state SOS to obey the laws equally for all candidates.

[Digger]

It....will....go....nowhere.....

Absolutely. We live in a Banana Republic.

[hoosiermama]

FYI

[GregNH]

This was the last paragraph in a lengthy email sent to ALL NH legislators on Nov 24, 2011 clearly showing the BHO is not an NBC, so they have been warned.

Now I know no one in the NH legislation body would arrest him but it is clear he has committed fraud, he is NOT an NBC and needs to be disqualified from having his name on our ballot. You took an oath to uphold the Constitution. You are either going honor that oath or not. By not honoring that oath you are guilty of Misprision of a Felony and I will work tirelessly to see that all of you are held accountable. The entire letter can be seen here Letter to New Hampshire Legislators

Greg Goss

Some replies I received.

Obama is not the only President to have eligibility issues, if we accept your standard for who is a natural born citizen. To name just one, President Wilson's mother was British and all four of his grandparents were British. He is not the only current candidate, either: Mitt Romney's father held dual US-Mexican citizenship, and Romney still has relatives in Mexico. --Timothy Horrigan

I pointed out to the honorable Mr Horrigan that he was incorrect.

From: Greg Goss [Gwg1955@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 10:52 AM To: Horrigan, Timothy Subject: Re: The Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama's Eligibility I think you need an aide that can do research for you. See the attached law in place at the time the Wilson's were married. With all due respect Mr. Horrigan, it is your duty to uphold the law, not pick and choose what parts of the Constitution you agree with or disagree with. See section 2 of the attached. Respectfully, Greg Goss The attachment can be seen here http://home.comcast.net/~gwg1955/HR133.gif

The honorable Horrigan replies.

From: "Horrigan, Timothy" To: "Greg Goss" Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 1:28 PM Subject: RE: The Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama's Eligibility

It is fun trying to refute you Birther types but it is ultimately futile, because you keep shifting the basis of your arguments. This week's argument seems flawed because we would be kicking Obama off the ballot based a technicality stemming from the citizenship of his absentee father, whom he barely even knew. But the week is almost over and we doubtless will be treated to a different argument next week.

At least you are only mildly insulting and you are not from out of state.

--Timothy Horrigan

Another

Dear Mr. Goss:

As a representative for the House of Representatives in New Hampshire, I have no authority to make an arrest of an illegitimate president under the U.S. Constitution or the N.H. Constitution.

Those with such authority would include the various county sheriffs in New Hampshire or federal law enforcement agents. If you would like to pursue an effort to hold Mr. Obama accountable for improperly filling the president's position, you should pursue an effort that is constitutional--and not the one you mention.

As much as I'd like to to see a new president in office as soon as possible, and as much as I'm upset by how nonchalantly the issue of Obama's eligibility is being taken, there is anything I can do under the constitution to hold him accountable. And thus, I will personally be waiting in great anticipation for the next presidential election and the end of a horrible four-year term of a terrible president--illegitimate or not.

Rep. Andrew J. Manuse, R-Derry

And this guy with a reference to a bill that I can't find...

----- Original Message ----- From: Hoell, JR To: Greg Goss Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:33 PM Subject: RE: The Supreme Court Has Ruled on Obama's Eligibility

Mr. Goss, Thank you for writing in reference to the obvious in-eligibility of BHO to be on the ballot. I am willing to you to let you know I am willing to help. In fact, you may find other House members who also respond to you that are willing to help. I think the next step is a letter to the SOS and the AG's office indicating they have failed to do their jobs given the data that has been presented. I have a bill in to set up a study committee to review the requirements of the AG's office.

This bill can be morphed into many things, one of which may be to require the AG to have formal documentation on file for all candidates for POTUS.

2012-H-2785-R title: establishing a committee to study the duties and responsibilities of the attorney general which are required in law.

Sponsors: (Prime)J.R. Hoell

Feel free to call to discuss.

I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday. God Bless.

JR

Rep. Hoell 315-9002 jrhoell.com

And I mean it when I say I will work tirelessly to see them all held responsible.

[GregNH]

I have been chastised, called names, and in general received many comments like this. Some of the others here have been through this type of ridicule as well. If not for the tireless efforts of the few we wouldn’t even have this once great country.

[Bikkuri]

Great to see you again.. been awhile ;)
And, Happy New year :D

[Bikkuri]

Hang in there Greg.. wish I was there so I could help in any way I could..

..and Happy New Year to you and yours... lets hope and pray that things will get better.

[Political Junkie Too]

I would think that if anyone would have standing, it would be state legislatures. The courts can't get around the fact that the Constitution gives the state legislatures the power to choose electors in any maner they wish. Holding Constitutional power on the matter must give them standing because it comes ftom a higher authority than the lower courts.

-PJ

[Jacquerie]

Have you read the law of your State regarding how electors are appointed, and the procedure for counting the votes and sending them to the Senate?

I read them for my home State of FL. It assumes the candidates from the political parties are Constitutionally qualified. The process, from well before the people vote, to the time the results are sent to the Senate, is specified. There is no room for fuzzy interpretation, including how to conduct recounts on close votes. The process is set up to be independent of which party controls the Legislature. It is also independent of the courts.

Until a single State legislature decides by law on how to deal with questionable Presidential qualifications, Hussein will be on all 57 ballots. No court will remove him. Bet on it.

[butterdezillion]

Greg, was it an actual suit the legislators filed asking for a hearing before the NH Supreme Court?

Is there a way to sue these legislators for violating their oaths of office by allowing due process and equal protection to be violated on their watch? If so, the courts would be able to provide the only remedy for the accused legislators. It wouldn’t have time to be resolved before the primary but the issue would still be alive after the primary.

Or who is supposed to oversee the SOS? Maybe that’s the person to be sued; they all take oaths to the US Constitution, I’m sure. Or what is the procedure for impeachment? What legal options are on the table?

[butterdezillion]

There’s a suit in AZ, IIRC, seeking to invalidate the DNC’s certification of candidacy because the DNC cannot possibly know whether Obama is a “natural born citizen”.

The DNC’s certification is perjury, since the Hawaii Democratic Party refused to certify Obama’s eligibility and the DNC supposedly leaves the determination of eligibility up to the state democratic parties. And the HDOH has confirmed that nobody from the DNC even asked to see Obama’s records.