Posted on 09/18/2011 8:39:11 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
I really don’t understand my friend Tucker Carlson. He owns the website The Daily Caller and it currently has on its front page the most vile story — referring to a sex act with Governor Sarah Palin as a “womb shifter.” It is even the headline. Do you know what that means? Figure it out It is really vile. It is not just smut…this is violence against women.
The “womb shifter” reference reported in the story is only the tip of the ice berg in terms of the vile nature of the posting. I am sparing you the details. To show you how bad it is, however, I have put a screen grab up of the front page reference on Tucker’s website. (I am deliberately not putting the link up since I am not going to help Tucker be a pig…he apparently can do it all himself without my help.)
I keep asking myself, why would Tucker allow this to be posted on his website? I am suspicous his website is not doing well and this is one quick last breath to create buzz to keep it afloat. I wish Tucker had not allowed this to be posted on a site associated with his name because Tucker and I have been friends (and even colleagues) for years. I have always liked Tucker and I assume you can tell that when I introduce him and greet him on air.
I don’t like it when I see that my friends do disgraceful things – but we need to start calling out even our friends to stop this. Tucker has daughters and a wife and I would think he in particular would not want to be a purveyer of smut (and this is actually more, this is violence against women)
(Excerpt) Read more at gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com ...
No, she's actually the better-looking Alan Colmes in drag.
Leni
After processing your answer, I will need a full six months of therapy!!!!
Middle name wouldn't happen to be "Changey", would it?
I’m pretty certain that neither Tyson nor Carlson would have the guts (or stupidity) to make this statement in the real presence of Todd Palin.
I assume that people who struggle to be respectful lack class. It’s not a high hurdle, therefore not clearing it brings forth the 2K pound brick pile... on your head.
So rolling one’s eyes at Palin indicates a lack of class and respect.
Who, then, is a worthy candidate for eye-rolling?
Where is the line between good and bad eye-rolling?
Do you see how ridiculous this is?
Maybe the guy doesn’t care for Palin.
It’s not a crime yet.
You aren’t paying attention. The MALE counterpoint to Palin does not exist, regardless of gravitas or lack thereof. You refuse to acknowledge the obvious, therefore it is uesless to make a list for you. Palin is low-hanging fruit for elitists of all stripes. Since I consider her to be a good representation of bible-believing middle-class Americans I consider any disdain for her to be disdain for the people who make this country great. Sorry, but Christie laughed and rolled his eyes because he thinks that he is too good for her, and too good for me. He isn’t by a long shot.
People dislike things. There isn’t always a deep reason.
I dislike lima beans and rye bread. I’d probably roll my eyes at them or worse.
That does not mean I hate them or that I want them eliminated.
It does not mean that all folks who DO like them are bad.
It just means I have an opinion. Folks do that.
Lima beans and rye bread are surely nutritious but I
won’t be ordering them or recommending them. See?
I see straining, and I see a gnat. I don’t care for CC, why on earth do you give a damn?
I saw greta screaming at carlson and went to his web site to see what she was so deranged about. Looks to me like greta got it all wrong, as usual. I’m no fan of Chatsworth Carlson III, and have always regarded him as a preppy dick, but Greta was mad at the wrong guy. Maybe she wanted another interview with Mike Tyson.
I posted this on another thread. It fits here too:
This ought to get me flamed to kingdom come, however, here I go. I saw Greta’s interview with Mike Tyson, and it was exactly as Tucker Carlson called it, a puff piece. Greta has interviewed Tyson quite a few times; she likes him and thinks he’s just misunderstood. She sticks up for him. Tucker doesn’t. Tucker thinks Mike Tyson is a convicted felon, and a rapist. As to posting the article by Tyson, it is indeed newsworthy, and something the mainstream press has totally avoided. The Daily Caller put up an article that the lamestream media wouldn’t. Whether Tucker likes Palin or not, favors Romney or not, the article was a good indication of the true character of Mike Tyson and he should be exposed for what he truly is, a scumbag.
Now, as to Palin being exposed, it ain’t pretty, but she is definitely in the public eye and considering the new book that is out about her private life, this article appearing on The Daily Caller is not to be unexpected, as Tyson was responding to questions about what he thought of the book on Palin and her alleged relationship with the black sports player with whom she supposedly had a one night stand. It doesn’t sound like Palin has denied that as of yet. That compounded with Palin having eloped with Todd and having a baby 8 months later makes it fairly obvious that she and Todd eloped because she was pregnant. So, if both are true, and again Palin has yet to deny any of it, then she had a one night stand with a guy, was pregnant when she eloped, and then of course her daughter also got pregnant out of wedlock too. I’m not sure Palin is all she’s been cracked up to be at least as far as social issues are concerned, at least not by her track record.
Rick Perry is squeaky clean in his personal life, as is Mitt Romney and Ron Paul. As is Rick Santorum and most of the others with the exception of Newt Gingrich, who also has a bad track record of having extramarital affairs, and who has been condemned by conservatives for his personal behavior in the past. Why no condemnation of what appears to have been Sarah’s personal past? The guy she had the one night stand with it appears has confirmed that it indeed did take place. I guess you can say that at least Sarah isn’t prejudiced; either that or she was just experimenting with what she might have considered forbidden fruit at that time in her life. Who knows.
It gets back to the claiming of being very conservative and then living a different and therefore hypocritical lifestyle in reality. I don’t like what I’m finding out about Sarah, and I know those that are ardent followers of her are going to try to cover for her, but I think I’m done with that. Something smells rotten in Denmark, and I’m highly suspect of Palin now. Plus the alleged affair with her husband’s business mate that went on for 6 months, what we do know is that Todd very suddenly broke up the partnership. Why? It isn’t only what she may have done in the past so much; it’s the coverup and the hypocrisy that is getting to me. I now know that Palin won’t announce nor run for the Presidency because there are things I believe that she really really wants to hide.
Keep it under your hat for the time being, but now you're really in the know.
< /S >
He’s a slick side-show-salesman.
Are you a skinhead?
You are one sick puppy.
You’re not my cup of tea. Just too weird for my tastes. A robot brain.
“Keep it under your hat for the time being, but now you’re really in the know.”
No, it’s obvious she got pregnant by Todd, they eloped, and she had her first child 8 months later. Count the months. The guy she had the one night stand with said it happened. She has not denied it. Live with it. Todd suddenly dumped his business partner. It is said Sarah was having an affair with this partner. It may or may not be true, however, Todd suddenly dumped his partner out of the blue. Why? This I know. We’ll see what comes out in the wash, but it’s amazing what clay feet people can sometimes have and you don’t necessarily know it, until one day it comes out. Time will tell.
Why are tabloid gossip questions so important to you? You're giving a creep like McGinnis power and you don't even know it.
You're living with your head in the sand if you the candidates you listed aren't going to get the SAME treatment by the MSM when the nominee is chosen.
What will you do then when not even they will respond to tabloid accusations?
You keep living in your gossip world. The rest of us will gladly fight against the MSM and repugnant journalism for you.
And BTW, SO WHAT if she had sex before she was married! I guarantee you the majority of conservatives have.
“And BTW, SO WHAT if she had sex before she was married! I guarantee you the majority of conservatives have.”
Oh my, you just smeared tons of your fellow conservatives. Painted with a rather broad brush with your accusation, haven’t you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.