I posted this on another thread. It fits here too:
This ought to get me flamed to kingdom come, however, here I go. I saw Gretas interview with Mike Tyson, and it was exactly as Tucker Carlson called it, a puff piece. Greta has interviewed Tyson quite a few times; she likes him and thinks hes just misunderstood. She sticks up for him. Tucker doesnt. Tucker thinks Mike Tyson is a convicted felon, and a rapist. As to posting the article by Tyson, it is indeed newsworthy, and something the mainstream press has totally avoided. The Daily Caller put up an article that the lamestream media wouldnt. Whether Tucker likes Palin or not, favors Romney or not, the article was a good indication of the true character of Mike Tyson and he should be exposed for what he truly is, a scumbag.
Now, as to Palin being exposed, it aint pretty, but she is definitely in the public eye and considering the new book that is out about her private life, this article appearing on The Daily Caller is not to be unexpected, as Tyson was responding to questions about what he thought of the book on Palin and her alleged relationship with the black sports player with whom she supposedly had a one night stand. It doesnt sound like Palin has denied that as of yet. That compounded with Palin having eloped with Todd and having a baby 8 months later makes it fairly obvious that she and Todd eloped because she was pregnant. So, if both are true, and again Palin has yet to deny any of it, then she had a one night stand with a guy, was pregnant when she eloped, and then of course her daughter also got pregnant out of wedlock too. Im not sure Palin is all shes been cracked up to be at least as far as social issues are concerned, at least not by her track record.
Rick Perry is squeaky clean in his personal life, as is Mitt Romney and Ron Paul. As is Rick Santorum and most of the others with the exception of Newt Gingrich, who also has a bad track record of having extramarital affairs, and who has been condemned by conservatives for his personal behavior in the past. Why no condemnation of what appears to have been Sarahs personal past? The guy she had the one night stand with it appears has confirmed that it indeed did take place. I guess you can say that at least Sarah isnt prejudiced; either that or she was just experimenting with what she might have considered forbidden fruit at that time in her life. Who knows.
It gets back to the claiming of being very conservative and then living a different and therefore hypocritical lifestyle in reality. I dont like what Im finding out about Sarah, and I know those that are ardent followers of her are going to try to cover for her, but I think Im done with that. Something smells rotten in Denmark, and Im highly suspect of Palin now. Plus the alleged affair with her husbands business mate that went on for 6 months, what we do know is that Todd very suddenly broke up the partnership. Why? It isnt only what she may have done in the past so much; its the coverup and the hypocrisy that is getting to me. I now know that Palin wont announce nor run for the Presidency because there are things I believe that she really really wants to hide.
Keep it under your hat for the time being, but now you're really in the know.
< /S >
You are one sick puppy.
Why are tabloid gossip questions so important to you? You're giving a creep like McGinnis power and you don't even know it.
You're living with your head in the sand if you the candidates you listed aren't going to get the SAME treatment by the MSM when the nominee is chosen.
What will you do then when not even they will respond to tabloid accusations?
You keep living in your gossip world. The rest of us will gladly fight against the MSM and repugnant journalism for you.
And BTW, SO WHAT if she had sex before she was married! I guarantee you the majority of conservatives have.