Posted on 08/14/2011 3:09:33 PM PDT by MaxCUA
Do you think Sarah Palin will run for President?
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
I think what you're failing to grasp is that I'm not criticizing Palin - never have. I like her and would vote for her if she got the nomination. It's just that she's not even on a ballot at this point.
It's the obsessive behavior of some of her fans that's a turnoff.
I've explained that in many ways now.
If it's too hard to comprehend, then have a great day and keep on keepin' on.
“...it got boring after the first four words.”
“...I’m not criticizing Palin - never have. I like her and would vote for her if she got the nomination.
“...It’s the obsessive behavior of some of her fans that’s a turnoff. I’ve explained that in many ways now. If it’s too hard to comprehend, then have a great day.”
Enough said, ok?
You too have a great day!
You were doing OK until you said that.
So many people here want to issue orders...LOL
Take care.
In that case, you must be pleased about the fact that Palin’s record on debt and jobs makes the rest of the presidential contenders look like tax and spend liberals.
But to make sure, would you like me to provide specific links or data showing Palin’s record?
What? Is it Exxon Mobile? I know Palin ticked a lot of people off when she made them play by the rules. I have no reason to think you would be part of that vein.
The Republican elite sure didn’t like it when she called them out on their cronyism. These elitists think they have the right to manipulate and cheat people, and when Palin goes to bat against them they act like cornered weasels.
In any case, there’s really no fight between me and you. As I’ve shown many times, it’s the record that counts and it doesn’t matter if it belonged to Palin or to Peabody.
The record stands on its own—the record that kills debt, frees the market and puts the criminals in jail. This time around it just happens to be made in Alaska.
“Enough said, ok?
You were doing OK until you said that.
So many people here want to issue orders...LOL
Take care.”
Not interested in issuing orders, thank you very much. Hope you’ll take my word for it.
Ok, now I seriously need to get back to work.
Bye for now. Have fun! :)
Clearly English isn’t your first language or you are an idiot.
See, you are putting me off now. If all Palin supporters are as stupid as you are why should I even think of voting for her. I still think she is a good candidate and I would vote for her in the general but if you keep being a moron I might change my mind.
Are you sure you are not a Obamabot or Paultard?
Hell, you probably cannot even understand this post. I wish I could post it in crayon or pictures as that might be closer to your level.
Do you use “stupid” to mean “lacking knowledge and understanding” or do you use it to mean that you don’t want me to keep bringing up Palin’s amazing record as Governor of Alaska, and as Commissioner on the AOGCC?
As for withholding your vote for a candidate based on something you read by an anonymous poster you call stupid...are you sure this is how you want to decide what’s important in an election?
Look up Palin’s constitution-based tax structure known as ACES (Alaska Clear and Equitable Share), and see how much it has helped the people of Alaska.
Yes. Also a clear inability to learn.
Also see: Idiot, dumbass, retard, moron and liberal.
You are really acting like a douche bag because you are a Romney supporter. I finally get it.
Now buzz off stick bundler.
Palin is not toying or teasing anyone.
That is a self projected view. From Palin’s view, she is doing things on her timetable, her way.
There is nothing magical about all candidates being in by the Iowa Straw Poll. It is not a predictor of the end result, by any means.
There is plenty of time to get in, or to get out.
Don’t buy into all the “it’s all wrapped up” crap. The fat lady doesn’t sing until the primaries, and they start next January.
You logic is very faulty.
Bill Clinton has made $80 million giving speeches. There is any financial downside to dropping a pundit job and becoming POTUS. Being president and then ex-president is no financial disincentive.
But go on hating Palin. The forum wouldn’t seem the same without your constant slander.
“Even the Alaska Democrat Party Effectively Concedes that Palin Is Responsible for Alaska’s Current Fiscal Health”
http://conservatives4palin.com/tag/aces (scroll down)
Here’s why socialism and crony capitalism are in essence the same thing: they both violate the rights of man given by God—and both demand, at any cost, to hide this fact.
To realize that in the end neither power nor profit are worth the moral price is to know that in the end, you lost.
What does this have to do with you acting like a neutered acolyte?
It looks bad on Paulbots.
It looks bad on Obamabots.
It looks bad on Mittbots.
It looks bad on Palinbots.
You have chosen to be a bot and it is not good for the candidate. Palin needs your support like Clinton needed another scandal. You are driving voters away boy and I may soon be living proof.
In order to give your opinion a chance, let me ask you—do you propose I stop posting data about Palin’s record?
Is this what you say will attract more supporters for her presidential run? Help me understand the mechanism here.
How 'bout for starters, you stop posting hyperbolic nonsense like this below?
What? Is it Exxon Mobile? I know Palin ticked a lot of people off when she made them play by the rules.
And stop putting words in people's mouths such as you did with Eaker?
If you had a principle to stand on, you wouldn't need to resort to that type of BS.
That's Paultard behavior.
So you’re saying Exxon Mobile was happy that Sarah Palin stood up to their corruption? What, they were tired of being corrupt, and wanted Palin to put a stop to it? I doubt it very much.
If you’re not saying this, clarify because I don’t want to put words in your mouth.
I didn’t even bring up Excon-Mobil. You did.
You think your little stunt of starting sentences with “So you’re saying...” and then inserting whatever BS goes with your agenda is clever?
That is a Paultard and liberal tactic and anybody over five years old with half a brain can see through it.
Perfect answer Allegra!
It boils down to the fact that one can be a supporter without being a nut about it.
Also, reasonisfaith, it the future you might want to leave it out of your posts that you would drink her bath water.
That is in poor taste.
Don’t forget Perrybots. We have a number of them around here who fit the name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.