Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do you think Sarah Palin will run for President?
WSJ ^

Posted on 08/14/2011 3:09:33 PM PDT by MaxCUA

Do you think Sarah Palin will run for President?

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: gop; notrunning; palin; palin2012; sarah; sarahpalin; smellthefear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-237 next last
To: lawley
I didn't even read your post....it got boring after the first four words.

I think what you're failing to grasp is that I'm not criticizing Palin - never have. I like her and would vote for her if she got the nomination. It's just that she's not even on a ballot at this point.

It's the obsessive behavior of some of her fans that's a turnoff.

I've explained that in many ways now.

If it's too hard to comprehend, then have a great day and keep on keepin' on.

201 posted on 08/15/2011 8:36:03 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

“...it got boring after the first four words.”


Hey, sorry about that. Felt it was important enough to include some fair amount of detail.

“...I’m not criticizing Palin - never have. I like her and would vote for her if she got the nomination.


Reads like we’re on the same page here.

“...It’s the obsessive behavior of some of her fans that’s a turnoff. I’ve explained that in many ways now. If it’s too hard to comprehend, then have a great day.”


I disagree with your premise is all. You see, my definition of obsessive behavior is quite different from yours, apparently. Hence, the DISAGREEMENT, rather than any lack of comprehension.

Enough said, ok?

You too have a great day!


202 posted on 08/15/2011 8:54:54 AM PDT by lawley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: lawley
Enough said, ok?

You were doing OK until you said that.

So many people here want to issue orders...LOL

Take care.

203 posted on 08/15/2011 9:01:34 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

In that case, you must be pleased about the fact that Palin’s record on debt and jobs makes the rest of the presidential contenders look like tax and spend liberals.

But to make sure, would you like me to provide specific links or data showing Palin’s record?


204 posted on 08/15/2011 9:03:34 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately--reason serves faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

What? Is it Exxon Mobile? I know Palin ticked a lot of people off when she made them play by the rules. I have no reason to think you would be part of that vein.

The Republican elite sure didn’t like it when she called them out on their cronyism. These elitists think they have the right to manipulate and cheat people, and when Palin goes to bat against them they act like cornered weasels.

In any case, there’s really no fight between me and you. As I’ve shown many times, it’s the record that counts and it doesn’t matter if it belonged to Palin or to Peabody.

The record stands on its own—the record that kills debt, frees the market and puts the criminals in jail. This time around it just happens to be made in Alaska.


205 posted on 08/15/2011 9:05:44 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately--reason serves faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

“Enough said, ok?
You were doing OK until you said that.

So many people here want to issue orders...LOL

Take care.”


LOL. This is hysterical. I was trying to respond to your sign off. But I get what you mean...hey, at least you didn’t have to put up with being called a worshipper, accused of being in denial, then suggested that you can’t comprehend a topic of discussion. (REALLY joking here.) Hahaha

Not interested in issuing orders, thank you very much. Hope you’ll take my word for it.

Ok, now I seriously need to get back to work.
Bye for now. Have fun! :)


206 posted on 08/15/2011 9:28:29 AM PDT by lawley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Clearly English isn’t your first language or you are an idiot.

See, you are putting me off now. If all Palin supporters are as stupid as you are why should I even think of voting for her. I still think she is a good candidate and I would vote for her in the general but if you keep being a moron I might change my mind.

Are you sure you are not a Obamabot or Paultard?

Hell, you probably cannot even understand this post. I wish I could post it in crayon or pictures as that might be closer to your level.


207 posted on 08/15/2011 9:45:11 AM PDT by Eaker ("If someone misquotes you, it's because they know you're right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Do you use “stupid” to mean “lacking knowledge and understanding” or do you use it to mean that you don’t want me to keep bringing up Palin’s amazing record as Governor of Alaska, and as Commissioner on the AOGCC?

As for withholding your vote for a candidate based on something you read by an anonymous poster you call stupid...are you sure this is how you want to decide what’s important in an election?

Look up Palin’s constitution-based tax structure known as ACES (Alaska Clear and Equitable Share), and see how much it has helped the people of Alaska.


208 posted on 08/15/2011 11:28:29 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately--reason serves faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Do you use “stupid” to mean “lacking knowledge and understanding”

Yes. Also a clear inability to learn.

Also see: Idiot, dumbass, retard, moron and liberal.

You are really acting like a douche bag because you are a Romney supporter. I finally get it.

Now buzz off stick bundler.

209 posted on 08/15/2011 11:41:09 AM PDT by Eaker ("If someone misquotes you, it's because they know you're right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: casinva

Palin is not toying or teasing anyone.

That is a self projected view. From Palin’s view, she is doing things on her timetable, her way.

There is nothing magical about all candidates being in by the Iowa Straw Poll. It is not a predictor of the end result, by any means.

There is plenty of time to get in, or to get out.

Don’t buy into all the “it’s all wrapped up” crap. The fat lady doesn’t sing until the primaries, and they start next January.


210 posted on 08/15/2011 12:26:19 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

You logic is very faulty.

Bill Clinton has made $80 million giving speeches. There is any financial downside to dropping a pundit job and becoming POTUS. Being president and then ex-president is no financial disincentive.

But go on hating Palin. The forum wouldn’t seem the same without your constant slander.


211 posted on 08/15/2011 7:36:40 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (SP12: They called Reagan "unelectable", too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

212 posted on 08/15/2011 7:46:50 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (SP12: They called Reagan "unelectable", too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker; Behind Liberal Lines; TheMom

“Even the Alaska Democrat Party Effectively Concedes that Palin Is Responsible for Alaska’s Current Fiscal Health”

http://conservatives4palin.com/tag/aces (scroll down)

Here’s why socialism and crony capitalism are in essence the same thing: they both violate the rights of man given by God—and both demand, at any cost, to hide this fact.

To realize that in the end neither power nor profit are worth the moral price is to know that in the end, you lost.


213 posted on 08/16/2011 4:46:05 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately--reason serves faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith; Allegra; humblegunner; TheMom

What does this have to do with you acting like a neutered acolyte?

It looks bad on Paulbots.
It looks bad on Obamabots.
It looks bad on Mittbots.
It looks bad on Palinbots.

You have chosen to be a bot and it is not good for the candidate. Palin needs your support like Clinton needed another scandal. You are driving voters away boy and I may soon be living proof.


214 posted on 08/16/2011 6:46:10 AM PDT by Eaker ("If someone misquotes you, it's because they know you're right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

In order to give your opinion a chance, let me ask you—do you propose I stop posting data about Palin’s record?

Is this what you say will attract more supporters for her presidential run? Help me understand the mechanism here.


215 posted on 08/16/2011 7:40:12 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately--reason serves faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith; Eaker; TheMom
In order to give your opinion a chance, let me ask you—do you propose I stop posting data about Palin’s record?

How 'bout for starters, you stop posting hyperbolic nonsense like this below?

What? Is it Exxon Mobile? I know Palin ticked a lot of people off when she made them play by the rules.

And stop putting words in people's mouths such as you did with Eaker?

If you had a principle to stand on, you wouldn't need to resort to that type of BS.

That's Paultard behavior.

216 posted on 08/16/2011 8:04:01 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

So you’re saying Exxon Mobile was happy that Sarah Palin stood up to their corruption? What, they were tired of being corrupt, and wanted Palin to put a stop to it? I doubt it very much.

If you’re not saying this, clarify because I don’t want to put words in your mouth.


217 posted on 08/16/2011 9:20:29 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately--reason serves faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

I didn’t even bring up Excon-Mobil. You did.

You think your little stunt of starting sentences with “So you’re saying...” and then inserting whatever BS goes with your agenda is clever?

That is a Paultard and liberal tactic and anybody over five years old with half a brain can see through it.


218 posted on 08/16/2011 9:34:07 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Allegra; reasonisfaith; TheMom

Perfect answer Allegra!

It boils down to the fact that one can be a supporter without being a nut about it.

Also, reasonisfaith, it the future you might want to leave it out of your posts that you would drink her bath water.

That is in poor taste.


219 posted on 08/16/2011 9:55:19 AM PDT by Eaker ("If someone misquotes you, it's because they know you're right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Don’t forget Perrybots. We have a number of them around here who fit the name.


220 posted on 08/16/2011 10:00:46 AM PDT by beandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson