Posted on 06/26/2011 11:38:35 AM PDT by brityank
So tell me, how is this going to have any effect at all on your computer?
I am not worried about it. Imagine a freight train with 5000 engines pulling 100,000 freight cars going 50 mph. Now imagine trying to make it go faster or slow it down by varying the speed of one engine just a little. It ain’t going to happen.
If allowed to drift too low, things with transformers will begin to overheat as inductive reactance decreases on the primary side.
Read post 49.
Readers; this FERC pdf shows the history of the the frequency response project.
http://www.nerc.com/filez/standards/Frequency_Response.html
A big headache for electrical regulator boards is that of harmonic and interharmonic distortion. Failure to compensate for this will result in all sorts of problems throughout the grid.
In India, the majority of wind turbines convert mechanical power into electricity through directly connected induction generators. These induction generators require reactive power from the grid for excitation. The loads on the power systems in India also consume a significant reactive power, mainly due to agricultural pumps.
The resulting reactive power demand decreases transmission efficiency. Moreover, reactive power consumption is deleterious to the fundamental capacity of the power stations themselves as a result of the poor quality power factor unduced by the reactive power load. This becomes a critical issue when the available power station capacity is insufficient to supply the peak demand.
Finally, excessive reactive power consumption can be critical for the stability of the power system itself.
http://130.226.56.153/rispubl/VEA/veapdf/ris-r-1172.pdf
Bingo! Here’s the FERC Field Test document;
http://www.nerc.com/docs/standards/sar/2007-12_BAL-003-1_FR_Field_Test_Document_20110204.pdf
Here’s the operative quote;
“BAL-003-1 proposes to bring Frequency Bias Settings closer to Frequency Response. The drafting team proposes to reduce the minimum Frequency Bias Settings over a period of years. The drafting team proposes to establish a new minimum Frequency Bias Setting in 2011 (-0.8% of peak/0.1Hz, compared to the present -1% of peak/0.1Hz). The drafting team, NERC and the Resources Subcommittee will observe the impact on frequency and will implement a reversion plan as necessary.”
Looks to me like they are proposing tighter not looser frequency control and reading the other docs mainly between interconnections.
Get to work!
Leni
Not my computers ..digital gear in general ..the world is more then a PC ... large computer systems...networking gear, router, switch....Most digital gear power supply are designate to make DC of a predictable (with some degree of tolerance) AC and filer out predictable AC hum ...
Let inject a great big unknown variable in to trillion of dollars of gear to cope with something that engineers did not anticipate as a "Norm" see what happens...f...ing brilliant
Clocks and traffic lights are TRIVIAL in comparison to the damage this will do to our modern manufacturing base!
How long will modern CNC equipment run properly under these conditions?
How long will the computers compensate before premature failure, how many machines will “Crash” due to this?
If another government did this to us it would be a clear act of war, since it’s ours, this is domestic industrial sabotage!
The firing here should include a wooden post, blindfold, and last cigaret!
Another doc that outlines the proposed standards;
http://www.nerc.com/docs/standards/sar/2007-12_BAL-003-1_Implementation_Plan_20110204.pdf
Again the operative numbers;
May 2011 through December 2011 -0.8% of peak/0.1 Hz
January 2012 through December 2012 -0.6% of peak/0.1 Hz
January 2013 through December 2013 -0.4% of peak/0.1 Hz
January 2014 through December 2014 -0.2% of peak/0.1 Hz
January 2015 through -0.0% of peak/0.1 Hz
The attachment A doc explains that caculation and implies the current guideline is -1% of peak/0.1Hz;
http://www.nerc.com/docs/standards/sar/2007-12_BAL-003-1_Attachment_A_20110204.pdf
I’ve seen enough to conclude the AP and linked article authors don’t know what they are talking about.
Now I’ll be awakened by alarm bells on all 4 of my UPS boxes scattered throughout the house at all times of the day and night... BRILLIANT!
Read through all the posts. The story is BS.
Aw, c'mon. Don't take away all the fun the complainers on this thread are having!
I mean like, Who wants to know the facts? We'd rather bitch and moan!
Either way, “Fixing” what is not broke.
Stupidity in action, we have more important issues to deal with.
To hell with the watermelon do-gooders!
I was looking for the nomogram posted at our radio station in 1968 but couldn't find it. The method above is almost as easy to use.
Seriesly, or parallelly, has anyone seen an engineering explanation of the rationale of this experiment?
>> But 14 seconds/day error for clocks is significant. <<
Maybe so, but only if variations in the Hertzian domain are biased toward one direction or another — that is, biased “plus” or “minus” from 60 cps.
On the other hand, if the variations are more-or-less randomly distributed (which I suspect they’ll tend to be), then they should cancel out before almost any homeowner has a chance to notice a time discrepancy between his old-fashioned electric clock and WWV.
Perhaps selling power strips that convert the varying AC to 60 hz, manufactured only by our good friends the Chinese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.