Basically correct, although I think Allison Bricker isn't a "guy"... I think this is the lady:
Posted on 05/16/2011 8:40:02 PM PDT by wrastu
Here it comes
Sheriff, Don Hartman Sr.
http://www.mikechurch.com/Today-s-Lead-Story/in-sheriff-if-we-need-to-conduct-random-house-to-house-searches-we-will.html
Hm... how to put this.
I dont care WHAT the court says... if someone UNLAWFULLY breaks into my house, they are getting shot.
If it is the police making “a mistake” they better damn well expect consequences of their mistake - including sitting there with a gun to their head while I call 911 to verify it is a real police.
I have nothing illegal in my home, so I expect no police raid for any reason. So excuse me if I like to protect my home and family- I did not think I would have to protect them from the police.
This sherrif needs a recall election IMMEDIATELY
(a) A person is justified in using reasonable force against another person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person:Indiana Code 35-41-3-2 - Use of force to protect person or property
(1) is justified in using deadly force; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
if the person reasonably believes that that force is necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony. No person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary.(b) A person:
(1) is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, against another person; and
(2) does not have a duty to retreat;
if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent or terminate the other person's unlawful entry of or attack on the person's dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle.
To make sure you have done nothing wrong, serf.
SCOTUS = Supreme Court Of The United States != Indiana Supreme Court
Basically correct, although I think Allison Bricker isn't a "guy"... I think this is the lady:
Other than it being the Supreme Court of Indiana and not the SCOTUS, that’s my understanding.
Compelling inaction in the face of a “color of law” violation of rights pretty much nullfies said rights. The violation still isn’t legal, but opposition thereto becomes far harder. The department may decide it can absorb legal costs as a matter of course, as perforation is no longer a concern.
And how will you determine "unlawfully"? Are you omniscient and able to tell that an officer is not in hot pursuit of a felon who entered your back window?
That’s correct. Each state gets presidential electors. How those electors cast their vote is up to the state to decide.
“The Vampire Economy”
That’s a rare book. I found one in a European bookstore for about $175. Has someone reprinted it? Thanks...
And a citizen can choose to absorb legal costs for violations of his own, so any civil legislation restricting his action is nullified, by your logic.
It used to be that the Constitution protected the individual. I don't think this nonsense will change until politicians and "public servants" realize it doesn't protect them any longer either.
Someone claims that a sheriff and police chief think that.
What a spark this guy is trying to make! CWII, no doubt.
Great point!!!
your reply to me is so incorrect as to not merit me taking the time to correct your bad information.
You'd think after 200 years of abject failure folks would have figured out that electing them is better!
That is absolutely hilarious, but you are so right.
I tried one similar to that on a guy yesterday and he gave me that blank gap toothed stare of "are you lookin' at me buddy", so I'm sure he is not someone I'd want on my jury!
I think some of the folks posting on this actually fear having the police find out they have eagle feathers and ivory tusks stashed in their homes.
I'm more concerned with the thought that this particular Chief Justice was "turned" earlier at GITMO by AlQaida he was defending.
Saying that earlier I surfaced someone who seems to know the justice and wants to defend him from such charges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.