Posted on 04/27/2011 11:25:17 AM PDT by Mr. K
When viewing the PDF in Adobe the text can be removed and added in Layers
You can compress all layers down to one, but someone clearly did not do that last step to make a good forgery
Wow, your friend nailed it.
I think we ought to start asking REAL LOUD for the one with the footprints. That one can be (more or less) verified and should come complete with doctor and all sorts of interesting and complete information.
Please please please save me an original copy before it gets “ fixed”!!!!
The security paper should be a separate bitmap image that the text is layered over. When you move the text the security paper should not be damaged with white left-over type.
>>> So, do Wookies have layers too?
Umm, who’s brave enough to physically check it for themselves?
Onions have layers.
Obviously, not I.
“”I find it interesting, that the Nordyke twins, born after obama, in the same hospital, filed after obama, have sequential document numbers, before obama.””
I know people who have been working on clearing that question up for the past two years.
Yes, it tells you that the released PDF is a digitally created and manipulated document.
In 1961, Stanley Ann Dunham did not sign a piece of paper with a green 21st Century digital background on it.
That's a cold, hard fact.
I am not saying whether the information on this is genuine or not. What I am saying is that this is obviously a computer generated image that has been manipulated to at least layer the alleged original writing over the 21st Century digital background ..... colored green, no less.
Once you manipulate a digital image, it's manipulated and nobody can claim to know what else may have been manipulated .... or not manipulated.
I have been involved in genealogy reserch for years and I have a friend in Spain that works in the Spanish church and state archives. When he finds a birth documentation of one of my ancestors, he sends the documentation to me.
You know how he does that?
Simple. He takes his digital camera, takes a digital photo of the original 19th Century or 18th Century or 17th Century document and then he e-mails the digital photo to me.
The digital images get to me showing paper tears, water stains, ink smudges, etc.,etc.
Nowhere in the process is Photoshop involved.
Do you know how many of those digital photos of the original documents showed 18th Century alleged writing on a 21st Century digital background?
None of them. Zero. Nada. Zip. Zilch.
The document released by the White House is a digitally manipulated image and not a digital photo of an original document. Figuring that out is not Rocket Science.
Just release a true, unmanipulated image of the original document: That is all Obama has to do.
The digital photo above, water stains and all, sent to me by my friend in Spain, is of a genuine 1761 birth documentation dated 15 December 1761:
"En el quince dia del mes de Diciembre de mil seteciento sesenta y uno ....."
If I can easily provide a true digital image of a genuine birth documentation, without resorting to Photoshop, of a Spaniard that was born in 1761, why on Earth does the President of the United States refuse to release a similar image of his own birth documentation for 1961?
There are two very simple questions:
1.) Why won't President Obama simply end this circus by releasing an unmanipulated image of the original long-form document?
2.) "What is President Obama hiding and why is he hiding it?"
Here.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/04/27/birth-certificate-long-form2.pdf
I did. It’s definitely got layers, which isn’t what happens when someone uploads a single document. I’ll get my video on YouTube as soon as it’s done uploading, but it’s a big file size, so it’ll be a while still. Will post it as a separate title here on FreeRepublic.
someone on the original thread magnified it to 600X this morning and they mentioned the “unham” looked different. on this video it wasn’t added the same time as the “D”, it’s a different layer.... hmmmmm
I’m not thinking at all. I’m just checking updates as I run in and out of my office and wishing I had some popcorn.
It doesn’t matter if he gave out one filled out with a purple Crayon. 40% will believe anything they are told. 20%, the magic undecided, think the whole topic is loony. Too many people would lose their power, position or pride if he was exposed. It won’t happen. They will murder people first. As many as it takes. Luckily for Trump every serious political operative sees him for what he is, a sideshow attraction.
Brilliant
funny and brilliant
And this administration has liars.
The main thing this shows is that Obama is officially disqualified from being president, since it is proof that his father was not an American citizen, so he is officially not a natural born citizen of the USA, but rather of the British Empire.
I am glad we finally put that to rest.
Yes. You can right click it and ungroup it and play with it. I missed that the first time I played with it. (I don’t use inkscape very much.)
Thanks for this.
0bummer doubled down on this then told us to shut up.
Well, I think we won’t.
ML/NJ
The father’s race is listed as African, which I didn’t know is a race. Egyptians are from Africa and are therefore African. Are we saying that they are the same race?
Sitting Bull and I are both North Americans. Are we of the same race?
I really don’t understand this “African” race designation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.