Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Warns Supreme Court
A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^ | 19 March 2011 | John Semmens

Posted on 03/21/2011 3:20:12 PM PDT by John Semmens

President Barack Obama issued a stern “hands off” warning to the US Supreme Court on the issue of health care, saying that “this program is too important to allow it to be overturned by an unelected oligarchy.” The warning came in the face of calls for the Court to resolve conflicting rulings on the President’s health care legislation from several lower courts.

Conceding that “normally, it would be incumbent upon the Supreme Court to eventually clarify a situation in which lower courts have ruled differently,” Obama’s Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal nevertheless urged the Court to “back off. Right now public opinion is heavily against this law, but this is before the Administration has been able to implement it—a step that the President feels will turn the tide of public opinion toward a more favorable view. We feel that the Administration deserves a chance to show that the program can work before the Court prejudges it.”

Katyal also suggested that “deferring a ruling would allow the opportunity for some more turnover on the Court, which could prove dispositive if an additional Obama appointee or two could be named.”

read more...

http://azconserv1.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/omb-nominee-explains-obama-strategy-on-debt/


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: court; healthcare; kenyanvillageidiot; obama; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: John Semmens
Obama’s Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal nevertheless urged the Court to “back off.

Definition: Bullying

1.  intimidation of weaker person: the process of intimidating or mistreating somebody weaker or in a more vulnerable situation

Synonyms: intimidation, mistreatment, oppression, harassment, victimization, maltreatment, hounding

21 posted on 03/21/2011 3:49:49 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
read more...

Post here.

You wish to drive traffic off-site WHY exactly?

22 posted on 03/21/2011 3:56:35 PM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Geez, they just get more and more brazen as the days go by.


23 posted on 03/21/2011 4:07:15 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallandPowder

I hate satire.


24 posted on 03/21/2011 4:08:03 PM PDT by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

How dare that thug Kenyan!

I hope he has his ASS handed to him by this court!

What stupid reasoning! Its too important? Oligarchy?

IMPEACH this SOB now!


25 posted on 03/21/2011 4:10:21 PM PDT by Adder (Part 1 Accomplished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Am I too late to stumble off of my soapbox?


26 posted on 03/21/2011 4:11:09 PM PDT by Former War Criminal (My senior Senator [who served in Vietnam and Rhode Island] said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Ok...was fooled.

Impeach him anyway for starting a war without congress’s consent....


27 posted on 03/21/2011 4:11:58 PM PDT by Adder (Part 1 Accomplished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: so_real

I wish this weren’t satire and that Bam-Bam would be dumb enough to pursue this counter-productive strategy. It would piss off Justices Kennedy and Breyer as well.


28 posted on 03/21/2011 4:15:23 PM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Well hopefully this will light a fire under the SCOTUS and they rule quickly on making it unconstitutional.


29 posted on 03/21/2011 4:21:22 PM PDT by TJC (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

>read more...
>Post here.
>
>You wish to drive traffic off-site WHY exactly?

Perhaps he wishes to have a semi-accurate count of how many readers he has; a {unique IP} hit-counter would do that.


30 posted on 03/21/2011 4:27:58 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

“this program is too important to allow it to be overturned by an unelected oligarchy.”

A presumptuous bastard if there ever was one!


31 posted on 03/21/2011 4:30:36 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallandPowder

Oh crap, I got taken!


32 posted on 03/21/2011 4:31:06 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Perhaps he wishes to have a semi-accurate count of how many readers he has; a {unique IP} hit-counter would do that.

Yeah.

And if he gets a dollar for each of those hits by USING
Free Republic as an advertising platform for his blog then
all is well, right?

A stinking pimp tricking you into blog hits is a good thing, right?

33 posted on 03/21/2011 4:35:28 PM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

>>Perhaps he wishes to have a semi-accurate count of how many readers he has; a {unique IP} hit-counter would do that.
>
>Yeah.
>
>And if he gets a dollar for each of those hits by USING
>Free Republic as an advertising platform for his blog then
>all is well, right?

And all is equally well if he gets nothing at all.

>A stinking pimp tricking you into blog hits is a good thing, right?

But he isn’t really ‘tricking’ at all; he posts an excerpt and marks it as satire... so what?


34 posted on 03/21/2011 4:45:16 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

The Supreme Court has only to follow what the Constitution says and not what one man with a vested interest in protecting what he has spawned and signed, so as to protect his political career. If the Justices are honest in their oath, the health insurance bill will go down.


35 posted on 03/21/2011 4:59:29 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

LOL! Isn’t that in effect what’s happening already? He’s hoping against hope that one of the conservative judges will kick the bucket before he leaves office in Jan. of 2013. ;o)


36 posted on 03/21/2011 5:04:21 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

This HAS happened people:

Team Obama tells Supreme Court to Stay Away From Health Care Challege

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2688945/posts

March 14, 2011

Fox News is the source.

“The Obama administration told the Supreme Court on Monday night it should stay away from a high-profile challenge to the 2010 health care law until after a lower court has had a chance to review the case.”


37 posted on 03/21/2011 5:11:19 PM PDT by TruthConquers ( Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

“President Barack Obama issued a stern “hands off” warning”

...Just like he has to tell Michelle every night.


38 posted on 03/21/2011 6:39:33 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson