Anti-gravity: Science Fiction or Real Science? Interview with Gregory Daigle, Author of Gravity 2.0

Free Energy Times ^ | Mar 14, 2011

[Normandy]

Anti-gravity technology is a theme in many works of science fiction, and a hope for those who dream of radical engineering breakthroughs. It is also, I have learned, a topic of serious study in a segment of the scientific community. I recently interviewed Gregory Daigle, author of a newly released book Gravity 2.0: Design Strategies for a Gravity Modified World to learn more about the field...

FET: What made you focus on the design aspect of modification of gravity?

GD: If gravity-like fields, both attractive and repulsive, can be produced along the lines proposed by Extended Heim Theory (EHT) then it would make possible not only propulsive fields but also fields that might be described as barrier fields, suppression fields, traction fields and others. As an industrial designer, such new possibilities for producing fields capable of manipulating all matter much like electromagnetic fields manipulate ferrous materials presents exciting opportunities not only in products but also experience design and in redefining demographic relationships. If you can float to work, that’s an experience. If you can float your home, then how do you describe your residency? This has the power to impact land values (why buy when you can fly?), democracy (you can’t vote if you float) and injure social structures by creating not just economic divides, but vertical ones as well.

[Dead Corpse]

The assumption is that it is an analog to electro-magnetics. A negative attractive force and a positive repulsing force.

[Carbonsteel]

Ping.

[Larry Lucido]

I’m generally pro-gravity, but I’m open to hear the anti-gravity argument.

[Constitution Day]

As long as they don't bring in Wile E. Coyote, Super Genius, in as a consultant, there MAY be something to this project.

[lafroste]

Something interesting is that it was GPS that proved a part of Einstein's theory of special relativity. The problem was that things on the earth kept shifting because their coordinates kept changing. GPS relies on very specific time-keeping. What was discovered was that time "runs" at a different rate in orbit than it does on the surface of the earth, and they realized that regular time updates needed to be made. And that's because gravity effects the rate at which time "runs."

Gravity does not affect the rate at which time runs. It's the opposite:gravity is caused by time fields. If you calculate the flow of time on the ground versus the flow of time at an altitude of 175 miles, you will note that time on the ground lags the flow of time at that altitude by about one second every 85 years, a very small differential.

[Yo-Yo]

Sorry, I only believe Richard Hoagland.

http://www.enterprisemission.com/antigrav.html

[Impy]

The Jetsons was a lie! I want flying cars!