oh just charming.
Female driven?
Telling young women to go out and sleep around is “female driven?”
Gimme a break.
I like being single, but I don’t tomcat either. This is garbage.
I believe, the correct terms “F*** buddy”
Course and vulgar, as is such relationships
I believe, the correct term is “F*** buddy”
Course and vulgar, as is such relationships
We have rules. Can’t we do better than that picture?
That show looks Sleeee-zeeee!!! I make my 9-year-old cover her eyes when the previews come on {grrrr}. I hope it bombs!
Its the liberals with their 'nothings sacred' outlook. And yes, many conservatives are at fault here too. Many either happily slurp up the morally offensive slop, or say 'theres more important things to deal with'.
America's moral fabric is threadbare.
It wasn't so much "casual sex" as it was "just sex" with them. They still maintained the old fashioned "man's world/woman's world" social dichotmy. That way, somebody died or got "ruint" you just move in.
Not that the coal miners were into higher order philosophy, but lots of them were illiterate and looked at the Bible pretty much the same way Moslems look at the Koran ~ as a sacred and "magical" book, not to be read and studied, but just used to keep around for reading in case somebody ever learned to do that.
This is what God says about that: 1 Corinthians 6:18 (New International Version, ©2010)
Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body.
One New York movie reviewer said that Portman and Kutcher actually make sex boring. Kutcher isn’t much of an actor. What the hell was Natalie Portman doing in this tripe?
I saw the preview of this film today while I saw The Kings Speech. This No Strings Attached is just perversion. I am not prudish or anything....but I was disgusted with the preview and the film. Not surprised Ashton Kutcher would be in a film like this....but Natalie Portman can do a lot better
I briefly heard a radio host while driving to town this morning. I don’t recall his name and am paraphrasing his statement but here it is.
We, the solid conservatives in this country are only a few percentage points now. We are the same as Israels remnant who remained faithful to God.
Basically the country is lost tho it could be regained as God can do miracles. That last sentence was mine.
Well, isn’t the story just naturally going to be that what they intend as “no strings” is actually impossible. There is a personal, spiritual, connection that happens between two people when they have sex. It cannot be avoided. There are *always* emotional complications... strings... and massive potential damage.
Seems to me, that would be the whole point of the movie. Not to celebrate “no strings” but to show the flaws in it.
Hollywood: Working to make heterosexuals views about sex, homosexual.
Sex without love, or consequences, or kids. Just doing it whenever, with whoever, wherever. No strings. For your own gratification. That’s why it’s “no strings”, don’t have to care about the other person, they’re just a sexual appliance as far as you’re concerned. No love, no committment, no icky punishments that might possibly cramp your style. Monogamy? Marriage?
THAT VIEWPOINT is the HOMOSEXUAL viewpoint of sex. And they are pushing heterosexuals to have a homosexual attitude towards how they view sex and love.
>> Portman’s producer: “We want to do movies that are female driven ...”
Yup, she’s being driven alright.