Posted on 06/29/2010 1:40:59 AM PDT by jdirt
The former Honolulu elections official who alleges Barack Obama was "definitely" not born in Hawaii and that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate even exists for the president in the Aloha State now says he's the victim of a vicious smear campaign, threatening his position as an instructor at Western Kentucky University.
"There have been attempts by various parties, some bloggers and others to attempt to discredit [my] claims, but none of them has held up to any scrutiny or rebuttal," Tim Adams, the former senior elections clerk in 2008 for the city and county of Honolulu, is now telling WND.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I would venture that it was the same reason the republicans ran a foreign born candidate.
Yeah. I’m so sure the democrats would never ever raise the issue if they lost the election.
How many selective recounts and years of ‘selected not elected’ did we endure again?
The people who set up both major parties with Constitutionally unqualified candidates WANT a Constitutional crisis.
I wish I had a better handle on their endgame.
BTTT
Yes, I was in rare form back them. It is hard to believe how much damage Factcheck has caused this country.
Here's a unique way of making a statement with them.
You may recognize the picture of the man you see below. He is the one who said that I have "ZERO digital imaging skills."
His picture is comprised of 1,500 individual tiles - each one is a different test image I made:
your comparisons are quite interesting. You ceratinly had to reach the highest level of deatil to prove that...well...it was a good forge. So good that you are making people believe it is true.
I simply can’t imagine a campaign office doing all the incredible work you illustrate just to post a forgery. They could have simply not posted anything at all.
They even cooked a digitalized optical image.
All this operation would have cost them a fortune.
To me you increasingly sound like someone who is repeating to himself:
I’m an expert and it has to be forged, it has to be forged, it has to be forged, it has to be forged.
Let’s put it this way because there is lots of confusion here (maybe you should write a 1000 words essay - for the simpletons like me):
are you trying to convince me that the document doesn’t exist ?
or are you trying to say that the document exists but it is a forgery?
your comparisons are quite interesting. You ceratinly had to reach the highest level of deatil to prove that...well...it was a good forge. So good that you are making people believe it is true.
I simply can’t imagine a campaign office doing all the incredible work you illustrate just to post a forgery. They could have simply not posted anything at all.
They even cooked a digitalized optical image.
All this operation would have cost them a fortune.
To me you increasingly sound like someone who is repeating to himself:
I’m an expert and it has to be forged, it has to be forged, it has to be forged, it has to be forged.
Let’s put it this way because there is lots of confusion here (maybe you should write a 1000 words essay - for the simpletons like me):
are you trying to convince me that the document doesn’t exist ?
or are you trying to say that the document exists but it is a forgery?
a bit of personality cult there ?
how long did it take you to make that’
a bit of personality cult there ?
how long did it take you to make that’
Heh, heh, heh!
It would appear that the poster is a ‘fly’ chaser, mostly.
You can get up-to-speed on everything by watching my videos on Youtube:
FRAUD IN THE USA: The greatest birth certificate fraud in history
Especially if you watch all four parts of Chapter 1.
I’ve seen them. I appreciate the technical aspects but I don’t like them. The work is incomplete.
Not convincing. Not scientific.
To be scientifically credible you would need to perform a blind test and allow for reviewing.
1 a second Hawaiian Colb
2 an electornic scan of it
3 blackening (electronic)
4 optical high res photos of front and back of 1
(performed by same author :Factcheck)
5 digitalization of 4
6 perform all tests performed on the Obama colb
(by you)
7 number Obama and blind test
8 anonymize results
9 put anonymized results for Obama test and blind test in separate envelopes (figurative - can be electronic)
10 have reults reviewed indipendently (not by you)
that is how some Scientific Reviews do if you wan the results of your experiments to be published by them.
Actually the hard work starts now.
2Fairly quickly with this program once the database of images is created and resized (that took about 15-20 minutes. The mosaic took about 3 minutes to generate)”
2o minutes to resize all those images is quite a feat
and was there a purpose or is it just fun ?
Thanks for the link to the program
Could you maybe indipendently wan the results?
“Could you maybe indipendently wan the results?”
“WAN the results ?”
*snicker* :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.