[Mik Taerg]

your comparisons are quite interesting. You ceratinly had to reach the highest level of deatil to prove that...well...it was a good forge. So good that you are making people believe it is true.

I simply can’t imagine a campaign office doing all the incredible work you illustrate just to post a forgery. They could have simply not posted anything at all.

They even cooked a digitalized optical image.

All this operation would have cost them a fortune.

To me you increasingly sound like someone who is repeating to himself:

I’m an expert and it has to be forged, it has to be forged, it has to be forged, it has to be forged.

Let’s put it this way because there is lots of confusion here (maybe you should write a 1000 words essay - for the simpletons like me):

are you trying to convince me that the document doesn’t exist ?

or are you trying to say that the document exists but it is a forgery?

[Brown Deer]

All this operation would have cost them a fortune.

How much of a fortune? or in other words, what small fraction of the amount of money that they have spent hiding the real one?

To me you increasingly sound like someone who is repeating to himself:
To me you increasingly sound like someone who is repeating to himself:

Yes, you do, since you continually post multiple copies of your posts.

maybe you should write a 1000 words essay - for the simpletons like me

That makes no sense at all, since a simpleton would be unable to read the essay.

[Polarik]

"Yes," and "Yes."

You can get up-to-speed on everything by watching my videos on Youtube:

FRAUD IN THE USA: The greatest birth certificate fraud in history

Especially if you watch all four parts of Chapter 1.