[barbarianbabs]

they only voted no to try and save their jobs

[AdamBomb]

they only voted no because nancy had the votes.

Tanner and Lincoln davis would have voted yes if their votes were needed. They are all whores.

[Sybeck1]

No they voted for Nancy Pelosi as speaker. She OK’d everyone of them voting no to save their hides! This is war!

[se_ohio_young_conservative]

they were ALLOWED to vote no because they are in certain districts that are up for grabs. its an illusion.

[Williams]

Proud of them all.

Now make sure you work to vote every single one of them out of office because that is the ONLY way Pelosi and the leftists will lose control.

[Gaffer]

These people are not saints. They are merely haters of America granted dispensation by Speaker Pelosi the privilege of voting against her plan. Screw them all, oust them all, bury them all.

[taildragger]

How many were “yes” the last time, if they were they are on our “S” list.....

[Puppage]

Sensible Liberals: The 34 Democrats Who Voted were allowed to vote NO.

There, fixed it.

[tobyhill]

They don’t get off the hook by me. Vote every Rat out and then repeal this crap.

[TJC]

They are not ‘sensible’ they voted for the witch for speaker of the house. Off with their heads.

[jessduntno]

Sensible Liberals:

I reject the premise.

[Red Steel]

Sensible Liberals: The 34 Democrats

No such thing.

[Williams]

John Adler was early in telling constituents ata Town Hall that he got the message and would vote no.

I am looking forward to his replacement by Republican John Runyan in November.

Don’t think even for a second about leaving democrats in power. Any of them. Adler was a long time liberal dem state legioslator who hopefully is holding this traditionally republican seat for only one term.

[Jewbacca]

They were in the tank. More would have come over if the Madam wanted them.

[HerrBlucher]

LOL! They were all under the witches whip and were only allowed to vote no, not a single one voted no on principle. Sensible liberal is an oxymoron.

[RC one]

sensible liberals? because they voted no? I don’t think so. Nanny is just covering her a55. She told them all exactly how to vote so as to mitigate the repercussions.

[LADY J]

Don't be fooled. They made a deal to cover their butts.

Time to start learning that RATS have an agenda & nothing short of losing their office & their power will stop them!

[Lilpug15]

Kratovil isn’t sensible he voted with Pelosi lock-step. He was given cover since his constituents are POed that he sold himself as a blue-dog but isn’t even close to being one. At a town hall somebody hung a dummy of him in effigy here in MD. He’s still toast IMO.

[Williams]

People here won’t forgive a republican for having glanced at a liberal position.

Democrats are not getting any points for pretending to be slightly less liberal than they really are.

If you know the democrat party then you know damn well these people were ALLOWED to vote no because they helped Pelosi take over Congress in the first place.

There is no way on Earth the party allows then to buck it otherwise just to save their own behinds. This is a party machine.

[Gator113]

A traitor by any other name is still a traitor.

I’m not buying theater.

However, to give them the benefit of any doubt, hang them with new rope. (Oh sure, I mean political hanging, certainly not the real thing, of course not, by golly.)