Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AZ State Rep. on Committee-Approved Eligibility Bill: "Issue needs to be addressed"
The Right Side of Life ^ | 2/24/2010 | Phil

Posted on 02/24/2010 6:02:07 PM PST by Phil_GA

Yesterday, the Arizona House Committee on Government, chaired by Rep. Judy Burges (R-Skull Valley), voted to pass her introduced bill, HB2441, by a vote of 6-1 (with two Members absent). My original posting on this story contains the actual bill; in summary, the following is what the bill proposes to do:

HB 2441 provides a procedure for determining a presidential candidate’s eligibility for office.

History

United States Constitution prescribes all powers, rights and limitations to the executive branch of the federal government, stating “the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”  The Constitution further prescribes the manner for the election of the President and establishes the individual eligibility requirements for the office of the President.  The requirements includes that the individual be a natural born citizen, at least 35 years old and have been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years (United States Constitution, Article 2, Section 1).

Provisions

Ø        That the candidate is a natural born citizen.

Ø        That the candidate’s age.

Ø        That the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in the United States Constitution.

I contacted Rep. Burges on the news, as it has been breaking out all over (TPM, LATimes.com, PhoenixNewTimes.com, SeattleTimes, Yahoo! News, WorldNetDaily, and AZStarNet), asking for her comments. She replied:

This appears to be quite controversial for many of our fellow opposite party members.   I don't quite understand why they have such heart burn over a Constitutional issue such as this.  As state legislators, when we run for office we self attest that we meet all of the requirements to run for state office.  When our children sign up for sports, they must show a birth certificate.  When an individual goes for a job interview, they must take their birth certificate because an e-verify check is required, we need a birth certificate to obtain a passport.   This is the highest office in the land.  Our Constitution clearly defines the qualifications to run for this office.   How can meeting these requirements be offensive to anyone?

This has been such a controversial issue that it needs to be addressed.   If not at the state level, where?  Several states such as Montana and Oklahoma have taken steps similar to Arizona's legislation.

More at original posting...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: arizona; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; judyburges; naturalborncitizen; obama

1 posted on 02/24/2010 6:02:07 PM PST by Phil_GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA

Good luck, and I hope it is successful.


2 posted on 02/24/2010 6:05:09 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Phil_GA

Inch by inch, The One could be in hot agua.


4 posted on 02/24/2010 6:17:28 PM PST by wac3rd (Felipe Calderon supports the public option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA

Like I said, the didn’t go quite far enough. The term “natural born citizen” has never been defined by any state or Congress. Arizona is afraid to define it as what it should be, a natural born citizen is the child of TWO US citizens.


5 posted on 02/24/2010 6:26:58 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Yes, but I believe it is sufficient. The documents will have to be produced, the person certifying will be personally liable for fraud.

It gives the secretary of each state power to challenge eligibility instead of just taking the work of some party hack. It should make it easier to get a court to rule on the issue down the road.


6 posted on 02/24/2010 7:10:09 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
"Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading." United States v Prudder, 424 F. 2d 1021(5thCir. 1970),cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831 (1970)

Edwin Vieira, Constitutional Lawyer: "at the inauguration. . he's aware he's not a citizen, then it's a perjured oath."

Who is Obama? Really, What is his allegience?

What is he Hiding and Why?

7 posted on 02/24/2010 7:48:38 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Here's a great site to find your State Representatives and Senators: State Legislatures Internet Links

Just click Your State on the left and then Legislators on the right and Presto, there's all your state Representative and Senators with email addresses!

FReep em'!

8 posted on 02/24/2010 8:02:47 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Just sent emails to my local State representative and senator. Plan on emailing more tomorrow. Let's flood our respective state legislators and see what happens!
9 posted on 02/24/2010 8:13:08 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
Sample letter I sent:

Dear _____

Wanted to make you aware of the Presidential Eligibility Bill in Arizona and being considered in 20 other states. How about _____?

Relevant Urls here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2458364/posts?page=201

and

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2458719/posts?page=1

Plus, Arizona Legislature Bill Posting, HB 2441:

http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/2r/summary/h.hb2441_02-18-10_gov.doc.htm

It seems to me a Presidential Candidate ought to submit proof of his natural born citizenship before being placed on our _____ State Ballot.

Thank you for reviewing my letter.

Sincerely,

10 posted on 02/24/2010 8:29:10 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

“Who is Obama? Really, What is his allegience?

What is he Hiding and Why?”

From what I know about him he scares the hell out of me. I’m terrified of what he’s hiding.


11 posted on 02/24/2010 8:37:40 PM PST by Bluebeard16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bluebeard16
From what I know about him he scares the hell out of me. I’m terrified of what he’s hiding.

Me too. I want to know: Obamas’ hidden records: Why are these off limits?

1. Certified copy of original birth certificate

2. Columbia University transcripts

3. Columbia thesis paper

4. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups

5. Harvard University transcripts

6. Illinois State Senate records

7. Illinois State Senate schedule

8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary

9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother

10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)

11. Occidental College Transcripts

12. Parent’s marriage Certificate

13. Record of baptism

14. Selective Service registration records - (Did Obama Actually Register for Selective Service?)

15. Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007

16. Passport records for all passports

17. Scholarly articles

18. SAT and LSAT test scores, Did he even take them?

19. Access to his grandmother in Kenya

20. List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists

21. Punahou grade school records

22. Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.

23. Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.

24. Why did Barack Obama resign from he Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?

25. Why did Michelle Obama resign from the Illinois bar after only about four years of practice and where are all of the relevant documents?

Anyone who cares about their country should be Very Concerned about their POTUS hiding every scrap of information of his life. In fact Obama issued an Executive Order on his second day in office sequestering all his bonafides and personal information. Speaks volumes. . .

12 posted on 02/24/2010 8:59:18 PM PST by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA

Thank you Judy Burges.


13 posted on 02/24/2010 10:40:29 PM PST by Dream Warrior (Never underestimate the POWER of an ARROGANT Marxist President and Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA
How about this idea:

Could Republican and Democratic parties in each state require a presidential candidate to present his long form birth certificate---he could be required to attach it to his application form in each state---BEFORE he could put his name on the presidential primary ballot?

That is, I don't see how state and federal lawmakers could object to how political parties decide who can and who cannot put their names on primary ballots.

My point is this: If political parties passed their own rules that required presidential candidates to present their long form birth certificates before the candidates could put their names on the primary ballot, then we might NOT need state lawmakers to pass questionable and possibly unconstitutional laws that require presidential candidates to present long form birth certificates before they could put their names on the November 2012 presidential ballot.

Yes. In my opinion, the political party primary is the key first place to require a presidential candidate to present a long form birth certificate.

As I see it, it may be too late---and maybe even unconstitutional---for a state to wait until a presidential candidate applies to put his name on the 2012 presidential ballot before requiring a presidential candidate to present his long form birth certificate in order to put his name on the November 2012 presidential ballot in that state.

Again, let's look at the political party presidential primary as the first key place to demand presidential candidates to present their long form birth certificate.

14 posted on 02/25/2010 1:48:01 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA
How can meeting these requirements be offensive to anyone?

Voter ID comes to mind. That's offensive to Dems.
15 posted on 02/25/2010 3:24:58 AM PST by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA

obumpa


16 posted on 02/25/2010 2:05:10 PM PST by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil_GA
Good news!

Long overdue.

It will stop Obama from running for reelection, Palin becomes president and we can start putting this country right again.

This could give us our country back.

17 posted on 02/25/2010 8:05:44 PM PST by walsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson