Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms date accepted and date filed on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms Date accepted by the State Registrar and Date filed by the State Registrar referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of Oahu or on the neighbor islands of Kauai, Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, or Lanai), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of Oahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the Date filed by the State Registrar is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obamas Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
Stunning. Thank you
Oh, waving the white flag. If there is nothing anyone can do about it (you hope??), why are you even bothering to read this thread?
Courage is the test of all virtues. Do you know the implication of this? It means people who say “it won’t work, no one can do anything, just give up now” either have no courage and should shut and go mope in the corner by themselves, or are trying to dissuade people *with* courage from doing anything.
There are not other alternatives.
Yes... it was in the FactCheck article that I saw the BC.
But his real name is also reflected on every document in your post except the one somebody else filled out when he was a small child.
So.. again, where is your evidence that he has ever lied about his name? Exactly?
El Sordo, Buckeye was doing quality control for us on this claim of mine.
I have no idea what his intention was and I’m new here so I don’t know the history. But people who help me see if there are any holes in my logic or evidence actually help me to not get too deep in a rut of my own. Though I don’t always like it at first. lol.
Free Republic is the most honest place on the web, as far as people double-checking whatever facts they can. It’s bound to be unpleasant sometimes when steel sharpens steel. But if we can stand the process, we will all come out of it much, much sharper, and the truth will be found. That’s all I want on this issue.
Buckeye, you said you were looking for any holes in the claims. I hope you will keep doing that, and I will be extremely honored if you come away finding that what I’ve said withstands the rigors of your testing.
Even now that piggy has been absolutely outed as a lying troll, he hasn’t admitted his mistake/lie.
Normal non-troll 0bama-suckups will admit mistakes and correct themselves. Liars never do. They ignore the fact that their lie has been discovered and roll on, hoping people will forget and that their shouts will drown out the truth.
Piggy wiggins has been shown indisputably to be a disgusting liar.
Right. Now you’re gonna come back and say oops he MEANT to say a different day.
You might also ask him what 2 1/2 hours he was at the DOH - which is asking Espero to write bills against “vexatious requestors” because they are so short of help and desperate to be able to get their work done but still have time to chew the fat for 2 1/2 hours with somebody who loafs into the office wanting to know who puts the numbers on the birth certificates.
> His real name is (as per his birth certificate) And WHO gave FactCheck.org Obama's “birth certificate,” Wiggy? Was it Charles Lamb at C-SPAN, impartial Chief Justice Roberts or
YOU seem to be awfully careless
|
Bwahahaha. ;p
> Yes... it was in the FactCheck article that I saw the BC.
So you admit that the validity of Obama’s “birth certificate”
has been compromised. An unreliable paper trail.
And yet, you implicitly TRUST it ... interesting.
Is this the one who claimed she’d written the name on a napkin? If so, then good to hear it’s been debunked. It sounded far fetched at the time.
The simplest proof of your 'syllogism' is the absence of 'amended' on the face of an image posted by the obama campaign purported to have been issued AFTER AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE HI VITAL RECORDS.
It also is interesting that people want to go immediately to the last set of photos posted of the piece of paper purported to be the genuine CoLB, yet the previous two versions do not match the third offered image. And yet we have a platoon fo obamanoid sycophants playing at FR daily who want to defend such a fraud-in-chief.
“Enjoy, the truth will come out!!!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXAcHtdU3nY
Thank you for posting this, danamco!
STE=Q
You didn’t expect an obamanoiid operative to be truthful did ya? This one has kneepads so thick, it looks like it’s standing when worshipping.
My only consolation is that I don’t think Nobama will be re-elected in 2012.
Dude, you are like so hopeless! You keep forgetting the Birthers have been led by Orly Taitz. She don’t understand what a “burden of proof” is, and she’s a lawyer. Her loyal fans sure ain’t gonna get it. We are no longer in 21st Century America.
We are back about 600 years in THE SPANISH INQUISITION! The people (Torquemada, egs.) who have SUSPICIONS don’t have to prove anything. You are the one who has to prove you DIDN’T fly around on a broomstick twelve nights ago and kiss the Devil’s rear end.
parsy, who is IBTMPS (In before the Monte Python scene)
The very one. And it either a day or two before, or actually I think it was a day or two after, the election.
Yeah, sure...
And guess what! She was an ardent 0bama supporter! surprise, surprise...
I think further debunking details emerged but it’s a slamdunk debunk.
When I was doing BCs (not in Hawaii and, as usual, acknowleging every place follows different regs), "accepted" is when the document arrived/accepted into the office. "Filed" is when the document is given a number and filed/recorded in the record book. Think of the process as chain of custody going from A to B to C where everyone has to sign off on it.
Obot.
Troll.
Obattroll.
Wait....
Obot-troll?
Obotroll?
Troll-O-bot?
Parsnip, You seem fixated on the CREDIBILITY of Orly. You need to be more concerned about the CREDIBILITY
A LIAR lies ... ALWAYS.
|
Every time Nancy signed her name to those 57, mmm uh, 50 states she was lying. She swore with her signature that he was eligible, yet where is the proof? Those are contracts and she committed fraud. She further proved she knew it was fraud by signing a different one for Hawaii. Nancy should be the subject of headlines on this but for some reason, she has escaped the spotlight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.