Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms date accepted and date filed on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms Date accepted by the State Registrar and Date filed by the State Registrar referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of Oahu or on the neighbor islands of Kauai, Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, or Lanai), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of Oahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the Date filed by the State Registrar is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obamas Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
GOREFAN? He signs up today, this is his sole comment. A new hire or what? Maybe an existing guy/alternate screen name.
It don’t matter. 1898 happened. You don’t get the luxury of a do-over without convincing the court that it was wrong. I am sure some people think Dred Scott was decided wrong. It don’t matter.
What you are saying is “If we go back to the law I like, and disregard the law that happened later which I don’t like. . .then Obama is a usurper!”
parsy, who says you can not believe that is reasonable
.
Constitwitteral law.
.
It’s intensifying. It’ll be highly interesting and IMO once the house of cards starts collapsing, it’ll be pretty fast and furious. As various entities and individuals try to escape the conflagration. Not everyone will want to go down with the ship.
(Sorry for mixed metaphors...)
Mrs Wiggins butt buddy, no doubt.
probably the factcheck 'analysis' would do it, you know, the brilliant presentation with the shadow of an arm obscuring whatever they didn't want you to see, and the little patches showing stamp and signature that came from a different document. They could print all that out from the factcheck website and the judge would buy it, wouldn't he?
I mean after all, it's been on the 'internets' and twittered about, so gee-whizz it's GOTTA be real!
Bad mistake taking the obots seriously. They come from a world that lives in the sixties still, REVOLUTION! is their want, Mao, Stalin, Chavez and Castro their heroes.
And now they have infiltrated the best conservative website I know...but sounding too cocky, too sure of themselves. Thuggish. Might as well be wearing hoods, carrying baseball bats. Enforcers.
Heading for a fall, just like their boss.
“Ender” is Bill Ayers.
I think you may very well be right.
Have you compared writing styles with Dreams?
heheheh.
Ayers is a piece of shit who will be welcomed in hell soon.
That’s why he goes by Ender here.
Yeah, Perky & Kook worked for Obama to create Obama pom poms and jiggles! Oh, there's evidence fool and it's more than credible than your phantom play buddy you got. Money that Obama for his campaign is funny money to him. Giving it away to a firm who represented him in eligibility suits is no big deal. Gee, guess who is now Obama's White House council?
Obama had lawyers represent him in exactly 3 cases total. At least one of them was pro bono and free to Obama. In the other two (actually in all three), the lawyers moved for dismissals and got them. If you think that cost $1.7 million, I want some of what you're smoking.
Answered above. It's nothing to what the crack you're smoking.
Starwise you have the evidence handy?
I’m dense. Could you elaborate? Freepmail if need be?
I’m not famliar with the novel/or whatever it is that Ender WIggins is from.
Yes.
parsy
Bwahahaha, that is a good one! Constitwitteral law, for twits!
Typo—Law does NOT confer
parsy, whose hands are tired
N00b, if your chosen handle is accurate, your time at FR is going to be stressful. Gore is a loon, a scam artist, a gross liar, a shamu, a fraud..
Type—The law does NOT confer...
Ask him how many roofing nails he can swallow.
No judge has seen it. Of course, in order to see it, they’d need to bring in a laptop.
My gripe is with Hawaii. If the people who have broken laws in Hawaii get busted I can guarantee you it would bust Obama also.
And yes, I have presented evidence that Obama has committed intentional fraud. The only argument he could stand on was that an online image isn’t a legal document (precisely why we’ve been saying it’s crap for evidence) - but Hawaii has a statute which says that it is perjury if you invite somebody to rely on a document that you know is a forgery. So Obama is guilty under Hawaii’s laws, and so are Fukino and Okubo.
You’re looking for a smoking gun. These people are hiding Obama’s smoking gun. But as soon as anybody investigates the Hawaii DOH’s smoking gun will eventually find Obama’s as well. They’re not committing these crimes for nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.