The image discovered earlier, it seems, is the document submitted as an application for the birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II. Of course this is only a theory, until it can be examined and verified.
To: BorderRaven
2 posted on
12/11/2009 9:33:44 PM PST by
Dryman
("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
To: rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; ...
3 posted on
12/11/2009 9:35:25 PM PST by
Candor7
((The effective weapons Against Fascism are ridicule, derision , and truth (.Member NRA))
To: BorderRaven
Form of COLB that Obama has refused to release.
4 posted on
12/11/2009 9:41:15 PM PST by
Candor7
((The effective weapons Against Fascism are ridicule, derision , and truth (.Member NRA))
To: BorderRaven
I am beginning to wonder if suing Factcheck.org might be a better idea. Forcing them to prove that FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.
5 posted on
12/11/2009 9:47:05 PM PST by
Ingtar
(Asses far Left of me; Rinos to the Left; FReepin' on the Right with you.)
To: BorderRaven
Sadly the judiciary in this country is corrupt along with most of the legistaltive and exec branches.
6 posted on
12/11/2009 9:48:28 PM PST by
Frantzie
(Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
To: BorderRaven
There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obamas official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.”
These are the words of the head of the Hawaii Dept of Vital Statistics in 2008.
Every citizen of the United States, every voter in a presidential election, has a “tangible interest in the vital record.” Obama did not run to be governor of Hawaii, nor to hold any other office within that state. He ran for an office that has to do with every citizen of every state.
For the state of Hawaii to withhold that particular document from the secretaries of the several states and/or the election officials who determine who may or may not be placed on ballots is wrong as it could result in subversion of the federal Constitution. This should be ruled on by the United States Supreme Court, since this is an interstate question, not merely a Hawaii state question.
7 posted on
12/11/2009 9:53:26 PM PST by
John Leland 1789
(But then, I'm accused of just being a troll, so . . . .)
To: BorderRaven
338.17 is new definition from only a few years ago. 1982 IRCC.
This is another fake.
9 posted on
12/11/2009 10:07:56 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: BorderRaven
This is a very long essay but well worth the time to read it.
This natural birth business of Obama’s just STINKS!!!
To: BorderRaven; steelyourfaith
The image discovered earlier, it seems, is the document submitted as an application for the birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II. Of course this is only a theory, until it can be examined and verified. It can't be real.
It hasn't been stamped by the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit.
Cheers!
18 posted on
12/11/2009 10:52:44 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: musicman
72 posted on
12/15/2009 12:29:32 AM PST by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson