Posted on 09/21/2009 11:32:45 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
OK, you’re accepting the word of the paper, even though we know that they fail to print the truth day by day.
I simply do not accept the word of any news medium WO corroboration.
That's what YOU say. I asked what part of the constitution says that.
A document examiner will not authenticate an image. That's all she says.
If you want to offer a cite to something, go right ahead. But I’ve been over and over this with the birthers for months. It’s not me being thick-headed. You can see right on this thread where some of them refuse to accept what is written in black and white.
The lack of savvy in taking what is on microfiche in HI as absolute gospel truth is troubling since it is so easy to alter what the microfiche record reflects AND because neither paper lists the birth of the Nordyke TWINS born within hours of Barry. Add to that the fact that the Nordyke twins’ father listed for purposes of his wifes prenatal care his address as the clinic addy on the same street as the supposed Obama residence and we have the even easier means to alter the microfiche records of the two papers. Only corroboration of the record will make the microfiche records genuine ... the absence of the Nordyke twins, born to a Doctor on the Islands is most disturbing since that would have been a far more noteworthy event than the baby born to the underaged daughter of a banker on the Islands ... and the twins are not listed in any of the papers which followed for four weeks after their birth. Frankly, when someone makes the microfiche imagery an axiom to their argument for Barry’s place and time of birth, I immediately see them as a shill or ill informed and satisfied to remain such.
And I forgot to mention that the Nordyke twins’ BC numbers are lower not higher than the one claimed for Barry who was born hours before them supposedly, at the same hospital.
Perhaps you missed this:
2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from Ron Polarik, [PDF] who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the Daily Kos, the Obama Campaign, Factcheck.org and others
The answer to that would be no. He could lose his citizenship only if he gave it up himself, and only as an adult.
He also couldn't meet them because he wasn't born in Panama.
And where exactly in the Constitution does it say that?
And time and time again, I see you refusing to accept the solid backup of the constitution contained in the Federalist Papers. The true meaning of "Natural Born Citizen" is clearly given therein, and you refuse to accept it.
There are no mysteries in the constitution; they all are resolved through the Federalist Papers, Websters 1828 Dictionary, Black's, and the Encyclopedia Britanica, but you don't like what they say.
The constitution has no glossary; the answer is in the letters exchanged between Madison and Jay regarding that particular clause. Facts are so uncomfortable!
Well, that should be an interesting one to watch.
“Facts are so uncomfortable!”
Ditto. It get’s tiring playing with these obots.
[You must understand that Stanley Ann Dunham, left America to go to Kenya]
You know this how? Is this provable fact? Or birther legend?
Time and time again, I've seen you and the others refuse to accept the clear explanation from a ruling of the United States Supreme Court, because you don't like what it says.
Lucas Smith provided a Birth Certificate to the courts that he secured personally in Mombasa, Kenya, which is in Orly Taitz presentation to the courts on Oct 5, 2009
I presume that for Obama to be born in Mombasa, Kenya
His mother would have to be present.
It is yet to be determined if it is a genuine document or not. It does not contradict the Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth, as Orly Taitz now has in her possession, the page 11 of the divorce decree which is Obama’s COLB from Hawaii.
It will be interesting to see what happens..
YOu are a real scammer!
How does a devoted Obummanite manage to stay here lying, deflecting, and dissembling?
The SCOTUS has never ruled on this because there is nothing to rule on. Obama is the first pretender to pull a coup on the whitehouse.
Could you possibly be referring to the letter between John Jay and George Washington dated July 25, 1787? If so, then can you point out where Jay defines natural-born citizen?
If you are, in fact, referring to a letter or letters between Jay and Madison where the definition of natural-born citizen was discussed then could you please give the dates and/or links?
Facts are so uncomfortable!
Indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.