Skip to comments.
What's Wrong With E=MC^2?
Scientific Blogging ^
| August 15, 2009
| Johannes Koelman
Posted on 08/16/2009 4:08:31 PM PDT by decimon
Google E=mc2 is wrong and you get 1,060 hits. Google E=mc2 is correct and you get a mere 138 hits. There you have it. It took us a more than a century, but finally this crazy inconsistent theory of relativity got outvoted. Common sense cries victory!
Fortunately, science does not work that way. Science is no democracy, and we do not render a theory invalid by popular vote. Einstein's theory of relativity has stood the test of time and its correctness is beyond any doubt. But... there is an issue with what is arguably the most famous equation in the history of natural sciences.
So what is the problem with Einstein's mass-energy relation?
(Excerpt) Read more at scientificblogging.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: Star Traveler
Now..., does that mean youre at a higher altitude, or a lower altitude? :-)A higher age.
41
posted on
08/16/2009 5:33:17 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: KevinDavis; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; Las Vegas Dave; ...
42
posted on
08/16/2009 5:36:31 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: decimon
“In our time we have discovered that energy and matter are interchangeable.”
Picard.
43
posted on
08/16/2009 5:37:35 PM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Nemo me impune lacessit The law will be followed, dammit!)
To: decimon
44
posted on
08/16/2009 5:38:03 PM PDT
by
Star Traveler
(The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
To: decimon
I thought we were doing consensus science. That's what Al Gore said. Wrong gets 1,060 hits and right gets 138, therefore E=MC2 is wrong. Or something.
45
posted on
08/16/2009 5:38:16 PM PDT
by
sig226
(Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
To: decimon; allmost
E=mc2 is rest mass. E=Mc2 is relativistic mass. Seems catholic. Indeed. I was resting at Mass this morning.
During the sermon, I think.
46
posted on
08/16/2009 5:38:39 PM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(Obi-Wan Palin: Strike her down and she shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.)
To: decimon
To unify two fields, knock down the fence between them.
That sounds like bull. :-)
Only if you are in the field that contains the bull.
47
posted on
08/16/2009 5:42:03 PM PDT
by
2ndClassCitizen
(What came first the chicken or the egg. Well I had an egg first thing this am. Later had chicken.)
To: Tanniker Smith
What's wrong with E=mc^2?
What happened between my generation and the `Next Generation` that made them all a bunch of Athiestic Communists?
48
posted on
08/16/2009 5:44:11 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: Star Traveler; snarks_when_bored; decimon; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton

Lene Vestergaard Hau.
She's no Lisa Randall, but for a physicist -- not guilty.
49
posted on
08/16/2009 5:44:30 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: allmost
N=nvii is Latin mass
50
posted on
08/16/2009 5:57:05 PM PDT
by
dangus
(I am JimThompson)
To: BigEdLB
All in the Family, and everything else that guy produced.
51
posted on
08/16/2009 6:01:11 PM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(Obi-Wan Palin: Strike her down and she shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.)
To: decimon
“If it ain’t broke don’t fix it.”
52
posted on
08/16/2009 6:08:52 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: decimon
186,000 miles per second it’s a law we can live with.
To: decimon
Science is no democracy, and we do not render a theory invalid by popular vote. Ummm, Al Gore and all the rest of the liberals would disagree. And since they outnumber the people who believe the above...
54
posted on
08/16/2009 7:08:35 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
("Fishy rumors posters" Check 'em out:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2311664/posts)
To: decimon
I think the theory that the faster an object goes, the more mass it has is due to drag inside our own atmosphere. Drag in space is inconsequential to velocity, as it’s a vacuum, and therefore drag is at an absolute minimum. Add to that the lack of gravity, and the possibilities for speed are quite good. Even using the gravity of planets or moons to slingshot around increases velocity.
Who came up with that concept?
55
posted on
08/16/2009 9:49:56 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The Tree is thirsty and the hogs are hungry.)
To: decimon
Relativity - it’s the Law.
56
posted on
08/17/2009 9:39:10 AM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Watch out, I'm a member of the Mob)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson