Posted on 07/27/2009 9:29:56 AM PDT by getontwitterfacebknow
This article was originally posted on April 20 and would serve as a reminder that the machine Obama’s original birth certificate would have been printed on, is the same model sold below on April 16 at a UK onlie auction. It also follows the timeline according to a poster, who said an inside source related information that a new forgery was being worked on, and would be “one-two months” tops before coming out. If this would be true, there is until the end of this week before that deadline passes.
These things are scarce, and not only this, any that are available no longer work, which narrows it down to a precious few. Granted, the ones no longer working can be repaired, but may not be so easy to do.
Thanks to Rhonda for finding this on Google’s cache server (will probably be scrubbed though). I can hear someone at the Obama administration now “Tell Soros at Google (George’s Son works there in management) to make sure their dam cache servers’ are scrubbed for any long-form forgery content!). Who knows, but this is yet another coincidence, at about 1 million to 1 odds of happening, with this model around this time etc.
I assumed something like that would be true.
The problem is; if they make a quality forgery it might work.
The chances of physically examining the created document are probably minimal.
The document (when produced) needs to be tested to see if it was just created.
I suppose we have variation on the Goebbels assertion, where now a forgery will be made legitimate by having enough media lairs tout it as such and tie their hides to the same forgery. ... Is the enemedia too big to fail? Are they now one of the bigger authoritarians?
Chuckle!
Work and Lurk, watching all the Palin Derangement stories.
I’m going to lunch.
It doesn’t have to be perfect. Just good enough so that it doesn’t look too obviously photo shopped.
Were Hussein a Republican, a personally signed letter from JC himself would be deemed suspect. As a card carrying socialist all he needs is the approval of a glaucoma patient in the final stages of the disease.
~Know Anyone Who Purchased A 1960 Birth Certificate Printer?
One Was Sold On April 16, 2009.
.
Minor imperfections on any printer used, would have to match those found on other August 1961 certificates.
Not if you discard then original and only provide a microfiche copy. That is the gameplan.
Don’t forget to do any fingerprint analysis on the paper,
wonder who has been handling it???
Yes and no. If they get the same people who forged Bammy's COLB, it will be caught in a heartbeat. To pull it off, they will have to hire experts capable of taking a document that is (likely) printed on paper that was manufactured within the past couple of years that has ink from '60/'61 timeframe. The aging of the paper and of the ink would be completely different and the acids on a 1961 document would act differently than a 1960/'61 ink on a 1960/'61 paper.
Just having the printer is not enough. They will have to engage in extensive chemical aging on the paper and the ink to produce a "quality" forgery. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it is going to be VERY difficult!
it wasn’t me who purchased the printer.
nobody will examine the original forgery. The forgery will be Xeroxed, so that they can present a real hard copy of a duplicate of the original forgery from 1961. I don’t know what they will try to put into the archives in Honolulu.
He’s a one-termer, regardless. I don’t know if Hillary will want to accept the nomination in ‘12.
self ping for later reference
Ping
It would be a bit harder to come up with 1960 paper and 1960 ink. Of course, if it’s not subjected to forensic analysis, that might not matter.
LOL. That would be rich.
More then correct format, paper, and ink I believe the embossing seal to be a major stumbling block. Granted there sources that will sell such seals and the press required to emboss a document, the difficulty lies in finding a seal that matches what the State of Hawaii used in 1961.
check this out
The really odd thing is they have D.C. and every state except Hawaii! Nah, just coincidence, right? right?
Regards,
GtG
I'm sure they're just temporarily sold out from a recent flurry of sales.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.