Skip to comments.
Know Anyone Who Purchased A 1960 Birth Certificate Printer. One Was Sold On April 16,2009
aconservativeedge.com ^
| 6-15-09
| aconservativeedge
Posted on 07/27/2009 9:29:56 AM PDT by getontwitterfacebknow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Joe 6-pack
“document printed in 2008 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper would be discernable from a document printed in 1961 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper. “
I assumed something like that would be true.
The problem is; if they make a quality forgery it might work.
The chances of physically examining the created document are probably minimal.
The document (when produced) needs to be tested to see if it was just created.
To: Joe 6-pack
Since the supposed real CoLB was handled by the lying factcheck.org scum shills, the printer has probably already been used. Lest we forget, Barry offered first the forgery he used on his website, factcheck and other websites posted that forgery as genuine, then Barry called the factcheck liars over to 'handle the real document'. The image media presstitutes are holding up is the Internet image touted first by factcheck and the Obama website and later shown by Ron POlarik to be a forgery.
I suppose we have variation on the Goebbels assertion, where now a forgery will be made legitimate by having enough media lairs tout it as such and tie their hides to the same forgery. ... Is the enemedia too big to fail? Are they now one of the bigger authoritarians?
22
posted on
07/27/2009 10:08:35 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: ChildOfThe60s
Chuckle!
Work and Lurk, watching all the Palin Derangement stories.
I’m going to lunch.
To: Joe 6-pack
It doesn’t have to be perfect. Just good enough so that it doesn’t look too obviously photo shopped.
Were Hussein a Republican, a personally signed letter from JC himself would be deemed suspect. As a card carrying socialist all he needs is the approval of a glaucoma patient in the final stages of the disease.
24
posted on
07/27/2009 10:09:32 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: Cyropaedia; Beckwith; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ..
Thanks, Cyropaedia.
~Know Anyone Who Purchased A 1960 Birth Certificate Printer?
One Was Sold On April 16, 2009.
.
25
posted on
07/27/2009 10:10:49 AM PDT
by
LucyT
To: getontwitterfacebknow
Minor imperfections on any printer used, would have to match those found on other August 1961 certificates.
To: Joe 6-pack
so even a document printed in 2008 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper would be discernable from a document printed in 1961 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper. Not if you discard then original and only provide a microfiche copy. That is the gameplan.
27
posted on
07/27/2009 10:19:08 AM PDT
by
Homer1
To: getontwitterfacebknow
Don’t forget to do any fingerprint analysis on the paper,
wonder who has been handling it???
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
The governor of Hawaii can not release the records without the permission of Obama. However, if one is forged and released a crime has been committed and the governor can sure as hell present the evidence of a crime to prosecutors for prosecution. I would love to sit on that Grand Jury. :)
29
posted on
07/27/2009 10:24:00 AM PDT
by
cpdiii
(roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
To: HereInTheHeartland
The problem is; if they make a quality forgery it might work.Yes and no. If they get the same people who forged Bammy's COLB, it will be caught in a heartbeat. To pull it off, they will have to hire experts capable of taking a document that is (likely) printed on paper that was manufactured within the past couple of years that has ink from '60/'61 timeframe. The aging of the paper and of the ink would be completely different and the acids on a 1961 document would act differently than a 1960/'61 ink on a 1960/'61 paper.
Just having the printer is not enough. They will have to engage in extensive chemical aging on the paper and the ink to produce a "quality" forgery. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it is going to be VERY difficult!
30
posted on
07/27/2009 10:26:43 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: getontwitterfacebknow
it wasn’t me who purchased the printer.
To: campaignPete R-CT
nobody will examine the original forgery. The forgery will be Xeroxed, so that they can present a real hard copy of a duplicate of the original forgery from 1961. I don’t know what they will try to put into the archives in Honolulu.
He’s a one-termer, regardless. I don’t know if Hillary will want to accept the nomination in ‘12.
To: getontwitterfacebknow
self ping for later reference
33
posted on
07/27/2009 10:47:34 AM PDT
by
Domandred
(Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.. I am Jim Thompson.)
To: Polarik; LucyT; FARS
34
posted on
07/27/2009 10:48:52 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: getontwitterfacebknow
It would be a bit harder to come up with 1960 paper and 1960 ink. Of course, if it’s not subjected to forensic analysis, that might not matter.
35
posted on
07/27/2009 10:57:57 AM PDT
by
3niner
(When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
To: agere_contra
36
posted on
07/27/2009 1:26:05 PM PDT
by
lucias_clay
(Its times like this I'm glad I'm a whig.)
To: Joe 6-pack
...even a document printed in 2008 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper would be discernible from a document printed in 1961 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper. More then correct format, paper, and ink I believe the embossing seal to be a major stumbling block. Granted there sources that will sell such seals and the press required to emboss a document, the difficulty lies in finding a seal that matches what the State of Hawaii used in 1961.
check this out
The really odd thing is they have D.C. and every state except Hawaii! Nah, just coincidence, right? right?
Regards,
GtG
37
posted on
07/27/2009 1:58:33 PM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: Gandalf_The_Gray
"...check this out...The really odd thing is they have D.C. and every state except Hawaii!" I'm sure they're just temporarily sold out from a recent flurry of sales.
38
posted on
07/27/2009 2:03:15 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson