Know Anyone Who Purchased A 1960 Birth Certificate Printer. One Was Sold On April 16,2009

aconservativeedge.com ^ | 6-15-09 | aconservativeedge

[getontwitterfacebknow]

This article was originally posted on April 20 and would serve as a reminder that the machine Obama’s original birth certificate would have been printed on, is the same model sold below on April 16 at a UK onlie auction. It also follows the timeline according to a poster, who said an inside source related information that a new forgery was being worked on, and would be “one-two months” tops before coming out. If this would be true, there is until the end of this week before that deadline passes.

These things are scarce, and not only this, any that are available no longer work, which narrows it down to a precious few. Granted, the ones no longer working can be repaired, but may not be so easy to do.

Thanks to Rhonda for finding this on Google’s cache server (will probably be scrubbed though). I can hear someone at the Obama administration now “Tell Soros at Google (George’s Son works there in management) to make sure their dam cache servers’ are scrubbed for any long-form forgery content!). Who knows, but this is yet another coincidence, at about 1 million to 1 odds of happening, with this model around this time etc.

[getontwitterfacebknow]

Weird timing...

[missnry]

Welcome to FR...

[Cyropaedia]

Ping!

[Frantzie]

Someone needs to ping Ron Polarik. Odd why someone would buy an old printer.

[getontwitterfacebknow]

If this sale is legitimate, is there anyway to verify who purchased the 1960’s printer?

[getontwitterfacebknow]

If this sale is legitimate, is there anyway to verify who purchased the 1960’s printer?

[autumnraine]

THIS EXPLAINS THE MEDIA’S SUDDEN ATTENTION. THEY KNOW.

[Canedawg]

The plot thickens.

[Jet Jaguar]

Ping

[HereInTheHeartland]

They better buy ink and paper from the same period also

[ChildOfThe60s]

If Hussein’s handlers manufacture a long form forgery, then they are home free. Unless it is done in crayon on a cocktail napkin, everyone is going to exclaim it as authentic. And the case will be closed.

I have been wondering for some time why they haven’t done this already.

[missnry]

Don't have a name but this photo was captured on the security camera of the guy picking up the printer.

[ChildOfThe60s]

They better buy ink and paper from the same period also

Not necessary. Anything more sophisticated than crayon will be sufficient to be proclaimed proof of the second coming.

Remember the pathetic forgery of Bush's papers? They still haven't really admitted to that.

[agere_contra]

Hopefully it was Gordon Brown who brought it - it would be the perfect public gift for Obama.

[SueRae]

ping for later reference

[truthandlife]

Could it be? Remember the truth always comes out eventually

[Joe 6-pack]

"They better buy ink and paper from the same period also"

The problem with most inks and paints is that once applied and dried or cured, they undergo changes at fairly predictable rates, so even a document printed in 2008 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper would be discernable from a document printed in 1961 with 1961 ink on 1961 paper.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

If Hussein’s handlers manufacture a long form forgery, then they are home free

Until the Governor of Alaska publicly states that they have not had any requests for the BC within the timeframe.

Even if Opossum says they finally retreived it from the estate of Granny Dunham (which is what I'm expecting), the doubt will linger and the story grows new legs.

[Ge0ffrey]

Obama’s people learned a valuable lesson from the Dan Rather debacle. When you’re forging documents from the 60’s, don’t use Microsoft Word.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Until the Governor of Alaska publicly states that they have not had any requests for the BC within the timeframe.

I don't think anyone cares what the governor of Alaska says. /grin