Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Do Homosexuals Want to Serve in the Military? For Sex, Of Course
North Star Writers Group ^ | January 16, 2009 | Gregory D. Lee

Posted on 01/16/2009 8:11:53 AM PST by Dukes Travels

Now that Barack Obama will be the 44th president of the United States and commander-in-chief, will he do away with the military’s “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays?

Within days of becoming president, Bill Clinton sought to eliminate the long-standing prohibition against homosexuals enlisting into military service. His proposal met such stark opposition from within the ranks of the military that he was forced to compromise with the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Now, instead of a total prohibition of gays in the military, recruiters and commanders are prohibited from asking potential recruits and those under their command if they are homosexuals. Instead, it is acceptable for homosexuals to serve in the military so long as they keep their sexual orientation to themselves. Any admission or evidence of homosexual activity is grounds for a discharge.

(Excerpt) Read more at northstarwriters.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: auntfancy; bhodod; dontaskdonttell; gays; homosexualagenda; military; missnancy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: SoldierMedic
In a Military Times poll, a HUGE number of people said that they would not re-enlist, or would consider not re-enlisting should DADT go the way of the Dodo. A large enough number to totally cripple the military for a very, very long time.

This is EXACTLY what the Dimocrats and their aid and abettors on the left want!! They HATE the military and this is a way of tearing it down and destroying it. They can then say, WE NEED THE NEW OBAMA HOME GUARD MILITARY, and form their Gestapo police force within. I knew WAY, WAY, WAY back in the 1970s that Dimocrats could not be trusted with my military. I knew few people in those days and throughout my military career who supported Dimocrats. VERY FEW.

21 posted on 01/16/2009 8:31:58 AM PST by RetiredArmy (Great patriotic stuff at www.patriotstore.us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
Heck, I’d like to be allowed to live with the Dallas Cowgirls and share their facilities too

Maybe you should try out for the Baltimore Ravens' Male Cheerleading Team

22 posted on 01/16/2009 8:32:35 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Not much difference actually, most male homosexuals were molested by adult homos when they were young boys. Some of the homos in the catholic church (<5% which gave the church a very bad name and frankly that was part of the intent), molested well over 100 boys. Male homos in San Fran play this sick behavior as a game — they pass the young boys around and even have a nickname for them — “Twinks.” Homos also have an international organization promoting their obsession called NAMBLA.ORG — check it for yourself. Pedophilia is part of the lifestyle yet hidden in the closet and soon to be marketed and forced on the normal folks.


23 posted on 01/16/2009 8:34:37 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
"Some people see something honorable and just want to destroy it."

There is something profoundly sad about a person who primarily defines himself by who he is sexually.

Judaism's Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected Homosexuality by Dennis Prager

24 posted on 01/16/2009 8:35:28 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("Every free act transcends matter, which is why any form of materialism is anti-liberty" - Gagdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Not much difference actually, most male homosexuals were molested by adult homos when they were young boys.

Repeat LOUD and OFTEN.

Homosexuality is a behavior, it is a learned behavior, it is an addictive behavior, it is a destructive behavior.

25 posted on 01/16/2009 8:37:03 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I agree entirely. There’s a hella lot easier ways to troll for sex than joining the military. Seriously flawed article.


26 posted on 01/16/2009 8:41:29 AM PST by FreedomFerret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

REAL LIFE STORY, written very quickly, because I have to leave.
I was drafted at the beginning of the big Vietnam buildup in January 1966. Sent to Ft. Polk La. for basic training.
Second or third day of BT, I had KP duty in the Mess Hall, ladling out mashed potatoes. I didn’t even bother to look up as I filled the trays of the lined-up recruits. I put some potatoes in one tray and immediately heard a loud “OOooookkkkk!” from the soldier with his tray out.
I looked up and saw an odd looking duck with one missing front tooth, and 1/2 inch hair, like we all had, and a very different kind of manner. This turned out to be RIchard P-——, who resided during Basic in Barracks #3.
Soon enough, we in the other barracks heard stories about Richard, who it was rumored was gay and an actual female impersonator. Richard flitted (literally) among all four barracks, introducing himself and showing everyone pictures of himself dressed up as a woman (at a club in Chicago, where we were both from) dancing with gullible men who’d come to the club. Amazingly, all the fellow recruits had a keen-eyed interest in this, and did not feel threatened in any way. It was kind of a curiosity, but hey, he was a fellow soldier right?-—so we went on, accepting this very interesting and different addition to our Basic Training OUtfit , F-1-5. END OF PART ONE.
gotta go. will bump later tonight......


27 posted on 01/16/2009 8:45:13 AM PST by supremedoctrine ("One was drawing funny faces, but his own was grave"--Richard Hughes, A High Wind in Jamaica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I know that this is a sensitive subject, but IMO a lot of priest pedophiles were/are homosexual. I have heard stories from ex-seminarians that some Catholic seminaries (I don’t mean to just pick on Catholics) were like gay disco clubs, at times.


28 posted on 01/16/2009 8:51:31 AM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

“In The (Royal) Navy”

Quincy, the little cabin boy at Trafalgar ...
that dirty little nipper!
He stuffed his a** with broken glass
& circumsized the skipper.
Rear Admiral Horatio Montesquieu-Smythe Hornblower


29 posted on 01/16/2009 8:55:07 AM PST by tumblindice (He used a half-Nelson too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Not much difference actually, most male homosexuals were molested by adult homos when they were young boys.

Do you have evidence of this?

they pass the young boys around and even have a nickname for them — “Twinks.”

I have no knowledge of the terms pedophiles use, but I do know that 'twink' in the gay community doesn't mean underage. It's usually a late teens (older than 18) or young 20s thin male.
30 posted on 01/16/2009 8:55:23 AM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I really doubt they join to troll for sex.

I want to join an NFL cheerleaders team (any team!). Honest, I won't troll for sex.

31 posted on 01/16/2009 8:55:25 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFerret

I would add that there are currently many gay men and women serving in our military. I’ll bet most recent soldiers are well aware of who these folks are. I seriously doubt that their presence degraded the military.

The real issue is that the Democrats want to make gays a “protected class” within the military. I think we all know what happens when certain groups start to receive government protection - sensitivity training, affirmative action, forced acceptance of things that are contrary to your moral values, etc.


32 posted on 01/16/2009 8:56:38 AM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels
There were two cases of homosexual predators that were in positions of authority in the Navy. These Navy men forced those entrusted to them of lesser rank into sex. Both cases were before the board in 1992 as Clinton was bringing out his “don't ask, don't tell” policy and kept out of the MSM. Senior Ranked Homosexuals do force their sexuality upon those they are superior to in rank with threats and coercion. In 1970 at Sheppard AFB a pair of Colonels were preying upon basic recruits and molested over 50 individuals. This is why it is bad policy to have homosexuals in the military.
33 posted on 01/16/2009 8:59:07 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

We all know that some guys paid too much attention while in the showers. Now they can do it without fear of official reprecussion. However, the blanket party may still be the solution.


34 posted on 01/16/2009 8:59:08 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
I really doubt they join to troll for sex

Lets see, a single gender unit, with enforced common living and sanitation conditions, prolonged separation from western society, absence of typical social sexual outlets.

You're right they're not there to troll, they are there to recruit.

35 posted on 01/16/2009 9:03:58 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoldierMedic

>>In a Military Times poll, a HUGE number of people said that they would not re-enlist, or would consider not re-enlisting should DADT go the way of the Dodo.

Which is why Rangel wants to re-institute the draft.


36 posted on 01/16/2009 9:05:21 AM PST by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
First DADT is thrown out. Then Charlie Rangel will work to get the Draft restored.

Wonderful.

USMC 1970-1981

37 posted on 01/16/2009 9:06:28 AM PST by Tahoe3002 (Politicians are positive proof that CRIME DOES PAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFerret

And you were in the USMC, USA, USN, USAF, USCG???

Me, USMC 1970-1981


38 posted on 01/16/2009 9:08:30 AM PST by Tahoe3002 (Politicians are positive proof that CRIME DOES PAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tahoe3002

No, but I don’t need to be a accountant to talk about taxes or a politician to talk about politics either.

Me, Tax Paying Voter 1984-2009


39 posted on 01/16/2009 9:12:44 AM PST by FreedomFerret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dukes Travels

After the end of “don’t ask don’t tell” comes “anti-discrimination” regulations followed by “celebrate gays”. In the long run, it probably doesn’t increase the number of boots on the ground, just the size of the bureaucracy and number of bathroom incidents. Progress ...from the point of view of a so-called “progressive”.


40 posted on 01/16/2009 9:13:58 AM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson