Posted on 11/07/2008 6:47:37 PM PST by mnehring
This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.
Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box? Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that disqualifies Obama from the office of the President. What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.
Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.
The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas
If The Supreme Court Decides…?
At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.
If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.
"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."
Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.
Sister Maya born in Jakarta does hold a Hawaiin Certificate of Birth.
Perhaps if one or more of McCain's electors is made a party to a re-filing of Berg's lawsuit, the Supreme's may consider him to have standing. If an Elector does not have standing to challenge the qualifications of a candidate, then NOBODY does, and that section of the Constitution has no meaning.
I don’t think you fully understood what I said at my post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2128383/posts?page=434#434
I said I found it at the FactCheck server. Meaning it generated from FactCheck.
Well, I'm not in Hawaii, so he'll always be a bastard to me. (just kidding)
Otherwise, thanks for your very informative post.
Thanks for the link. Have you considered making this a thread of it’s own.
Finally a Harvard Law Grad’s opinion.
Aww like Fack Check....that makes up the facts they check....Fact Check?
Read the link that The Mayor has posted at 472...Excellent analysis by a Harvard Law Grad. GIves me hope that something will come of this.
“He wasn not elated at his election rally in Chicago”
It could be possible he was mourning his grandmother and mother who weren’t around to see his victory. If you want to hit me for that statement, I’ll man up and let you flame
me...matter of fact I’m not sure I believe it myself. I’ll
be at least charitable and let Obama have that much!
Yes, I already read it. I agree with it, but I’m not so sanguine that our broken justice system will follow the law.
The electors could also throw a monkey wrench into Obama’s plans by demanding to see proof that he qualifies before they vote. But I doubt that they will.
According to this guy, the VP candidate Drake and 24 electors are challenging the isssue as well. They are trying to recruit more bold electors.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2127254/posts?q=1&;page=1
Yep.
The ball would appear to be in the Indonesian’s court.
Yup.
Thanks, David. Everyone will want to read your comment. A couple of days ago, someone on another website wrote a similar statement about Supreme Court Justice David Souter.
Ping to #471
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2128383/posts?page=471#471
Thanks to The Mayor, we know that -—>MONEY TALKS!
This distinguished Harvard Law scholar is offering a MILLION BUCKS FOR a THE VAULT FORM!
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm
This needs to be made into a video commercial go viral.
I also think we should begin a matching fund to up the ante and donate the money to charity if no one steps forward.
If he turns out to be legit, yet the son of some other X-known factor, so be it.
He had barely seen here in years, a couple of token one hour visits lately, no wife/kids ever saw her from what I’ve read.
No go on that theory.
What was denied was the request to stay the election, not Obama’s requirement to respond. There are two items listed on the docket...you clearly didn’t read them both.
>>>>I just flat out don’t believe that. I see the most likely result of the Petition for Cert as being outright failure to get votes to hear the case period. No further remedy. Certainly not from David Souter.
I’m sorry. Can you reword that as if you are speaking to a 3 year old? I didn’t understand it.
Look at it this way -- what is the greater Constitutional crisis -- discovering the truth BEFORE or AFTER the next two dates of significance? Which puts more at risk?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.