Now, that would really "screw-up" Chrissy Mathew, et al.
Posted on 11/07/2008 6:47:37 PM PST by mnehring
This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.
Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box? Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that disqualifies Obama from the office of the President. What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.
Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.
The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas
If The Supreme Court Decides…?
At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.
If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.
"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."
Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.
I don’t know if that’s the clip or not. On this thread was the first I heard of it.
Geeze......not this crap again. Was the author from API??? :)
I'm totally convinced you are correct!
I thought the lower court has to respond, to show case proceeded correctly?
The Warroom.com is the website that has the link where you can listen to past shows. There is a link on there to e-mail Quinn. He replies to people, but I can guarantee it won’t be until tomorrow because he goes to bed about 8 pm and gets up at 3 am to do the show.
“... If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.”
In which case, do we have a different president-elect, or do we start over?
Did you see #162 for an alternate theory of the larger issue?
Maybe some of you could answer a question I have. We all seem to be in agreement that Barack Obama’s refusal to release his original birth certificate is an extremely important situation and one that needs to be rectified before he is inaugurated.
Why hasn’t Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin, Hannity, and a host of others who are supposed to be helping us defend our Constitution and our freedoms, not shouting from the rooftops?! Do they not care?
Interesting.
>>>Respond” does not mean that Justice Souter has ordered Hussein to produce his birth certificate.
I didn’t say it did. I said the docs are there for review.
Amendment XX Sec 3 is the authority at that point. See #162.
I know I’m pimping my post #162 all over the place in this thread, but it makes the most sense to me at this point.
No they can't. 24 states have "Faithless Elector" laws. Look it up.
That may be the older clip Quinn played when Richardson was addressing La Raza. The other clip played on Fox News XM radio news is in English, and was Richardson on Wed. after the election saying that Obama was our first black President and our first immigrant President.
With all of Soros’s money behind him he still has not found a competent forger or a Hawaiian official who can be bought?
Now this depends upon the meaning of “president elect”. I believe it is speaking of the president elected by the Electoral College not the winner of the popular election.
If Obuma is not elected by the Electoral College because he is ineligible then I believe my scenario is possible if not likely. We should remember that political parties have no real say in this under Constitutional theory so the Democrat party has nothing it can do to save its interests.
All of this is obviously new ground with a great deal of murkiness in it.
That doesn't necessarily mean that the Annointed One has been ordered to produce his Hawaii BC by Dec. 1.
Here in the Hill Country the SCOTUS ruled against a BS traffic stop, O’Connor writing it would be good law, but the hassle of reversing other tickets across the country would be dangerous to ‘society’ and previous ticketing policy.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/04/24/scotus.arrest.03/index.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.