Replies

I have an announcement to make. After Part Two of Polarik's Final Report is published tomorrow, I will not be fielding any more questions regarding my research, either in the forum or via email. You are more than welcome to leave all the comments you wish, but I will not be responding to them.

Part Two is the culmination of four months of research on the COLB forgery, and I am going to let this post, and all of my prior posts and comments speak for themselves. If someone cannot find the answer they seek in these, then there is none that I could possibly provide.

All are still available for anyone to reference.

Simply type "By:Polarik" in the box and press SEARCH.

I will also be posting Part Two on my blog (The Greater Evil) and also on Phil Berg's website, Obamacrimes.com.

I have devoted so very much of my time into these, and I've already spent way too much of my valuable time engaging in rounds of Twenty Questions with trolls, sock puppets, and other argumentative people looking to pick apart my findings.

There are no gray areas here. You either believe that a forgery has been made, or you don't. The vast majority of FReepers are convinced that the OBama COLB is a forgery, so the chances of someone persuading them to think otherwise is about the same as getting them to believe that ACORN never engaged in voted fraud.

I hope you will understand

I have devoted so very much of my time into these, and I've already spent way too much of my valuable time engaging in rounds of Twenty Questions with trolls, sock puppets, and other argumentative people looking to pick apart my findings.

At least you admitted that you were wrong in post 42 about the seal being photoshopped on, by post 68. You are more than welcome to postulate a scenario with a forgery that uses a stolen or manufactured seal. You will be correct to point out that the seal on your 2002 certificate (DeCosta or similar) does not match the seal on Obama's 2007 certificate. Once you admit that the factcheck documents have to be created in this manner:
1. A computer generated border and text (forged or not)
2. A color printout onto the cross-hatched paper (which could be forged separately)
3. A seal pressed into the paper, a rubber notary stamp applied to the paper
4. The paper then folded and unfolded and then photographed

then I am frankly not surprised you would leave because your work is done. There is no more issue about photoshopping except for step 1 which is rather easy to perform. The other steps require implements other than photoshop, which as I have stated all along, could be obtained by a forger. But the question then remains, where and how were the implements obtained / manufactured?