Replies

I have devoted so very much of my time into these, and I've already spent way too much of my valuable time engaging in rounds of Twenty Questions with trolls, sock puppets, and other argumentative people looking to pick apart my findings.

At least you admitted that you were wrong in post 42 about the seal being photoshopped on, by post 68. You are more than welcome to postulate a scenario with a forgery that uses a stolen or manufactured seal. You will be correct to point out that the seal on your 2002 certificate (DeCosta or similar) does not match the seal on Obama's 2007 certificate. Once you admit that the factcheck documents have to be created in this manner:
1. A computer generated border and text (forged or not)
2. A color printout onto the cross-hatched paper (which could be forged separately)
3. A seal pressed into the paper, a rubber notary stamp applied to the paper
4. The paper then folded and unfolded and then photographed

then I am frankly not surprised you would leave because your work is done. There is no more issue about photoshopping except for step 1 which is rather easy to perform. The other steps require implements other than photoshop, which as I have stated all along, could be obtained by a forger. But the question then remains, where and how were the implements obtained / manufactured?

Nope. Not wrong at all. You'll see why in a minute.

I'm not leaving, either. I'll be on FR forever. I will, however, be completely finished with my COLB analysis, as well as answering endless questions from the same person.

There's really only one question to be answered about the COLB forgery:

For how long does a fish have to sit out in the sun before it stinks enough to where people get wind of it?

Basically, when Factcheck posted a forged COLB image to their website on June 16, it was GAME OVER. Once someone promulgates a forged image as real, AND CONTINUES TO CLAIM THAT IT IS REAL, then everything else else from that point onwards has to be subterfuge and cover-up.

Everything you need to know about Factcheck's photos are in Part Two, but I'll touch on some highlights here:

* There was more than one "COLB" photographed by Factcheck.

* One of the COLB's photographed is a new forged image that Factcheck made which takes into account my findings.

* There were three methods used to display the "Seals" (Photoshopping, embossing, and a real one).

* The "Seal," date stamp, and signature stamp look like ripoffs from a 2008 COLB.

* The "Seal," date stamp, and signature stamp are not aligned as they are supposed to be, and