Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA & DNC CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS-BERG FORCED TO HEAD TO SUPREME COURT
www.americasright.com, www.Newswithviews.com ^ | 10/30/2008

Posted on 10/30/2008 10:22:10 AM PDT by sportsone234

[...] Today Philadelphia attorney Phillip Berg, a Democrat and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania is heading to the Supreme Court, in hopes that a decision will be handed down forcing the DNC and Barack Obama to produce the vault birth certificate that finally proves once and for all, whether or not Barry Sotero, aka Barry Dunham, aka Barack Hussein Obama is natural born citizen and whether he was ever eligible to run for office of any kind.

[...]if it turns out that Obama was ineligible from the onset of the election he faces some very serious consequences...

[...] Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,”

(Excerpt) Read more at hillarynme.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; UFO's
KEYWORDS: antichrist; berg; certifigate; conspiracy; crisis; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Cyber Liberty
"Isn’t FactCheck.org part of Annenberg?"

YES!


21 posted on 10/30/2008 10:43:50 AM PDT by NoLibZone (As insane as McCain is , my principles can't allow someone like Huessein to be president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I guess, then, we have a lot of folks taking Annenberg’s word on some pretty important issues.


22 posted on 10/30/2008 10:46:41 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

So would Chuck Baldwin, the CP candidate, and probably the most likely to agree to file suit.


23 posted on 10/30/2008 10:46:47 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yes.


24 posted on 10/30/2008 10:48:13 AM PDT by Perdogg (Raila Amollo Odinga - community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
When will the court hear the case? NEVER

Why??

25 posted on 10/30/2008 10:49:20 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

People don’t check the owners of their sources.

Yes, using factcheck.org is like using the DNC for fact checking.


26 posted on 10/30/2008 10:49:52 AM PDT by NoLibZone (As insane as McCain is , my principles can't allow someone like Huessein to be president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
The information at factcheck.org is good enough for me.

You do realize that factcheck.org is an Annenberg proxy, right?

L

27 posted on 10/30/2008 10:49:52 AM PDT by Lurker (She's not a lesbian, she doesn't whine, she doesn't hate her country, and she's not afraid of guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sportsone234
Isn't is amazing to see the bias? Now if your name is Sarah Palin or you are Joe the plumber they'll check you out down to who your playmates were in preschool. They'll even quote someone “anonymously” who was born the same day in the same hospital as you who wants to publicly complain you cried too much in that nursery during your first day on this earth.

If you are Obamatrash your records, associations, and friends are all off limits. AMAZING and hopefully the core of America is so angered by this they are voting in mass to make sure this man and his minions are sent back to hell where they came from.

28 posted on 10/30/2008 10:54:54 AM PDT by cosmic_me (Stop picking your nose. People are watching.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariebl
My personal belief is that he was born in Hawaii, but that there's something on the birth certificate that would embarass him

My guess is that it won't PROVE he was born in Hawaii, which begs the question that perhaps he WAS born in Kenya.

Although the Birth Certificate is important, what about the very real possibility that he lost his US Citizenship later, either when he was adopted, or when he traveled to Pakistan under an Indonesian passport. (By the way, what was he doing in Pakistan??? Attending a muzzie terrorist training camp?)

29 posted on 10/30/2008 11:04:04 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (I hate the socialist candidate, his policies, & his associates, therefore I'm a racist. Who cares?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
I say, the economy, the war on terror, victory in Iraq, immigration, border security are the issues. Not some piece of paper.

As "Naturalized Citizen" have or had dual citizenship, like Schwarzenegger, Madam Albright, Jenifer Granholm, we CANNOT run for President!

Nobama HUSSEIN cannot either as being an Indonesian citizen, pure and simple!!

We all had to swear to uphold the Constitution. I demand that Nobama does the same!!!

30 posted on 10/30/2008 11:04:10 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DaGman

Wow...the obamanaughts out in force today. Rush was just reading an interntet post on hillbuzz from one of them.

Don’t fret, this issue will be dealt with as the system allows. The best quote I’ve read on this, “the constitution requires proof of citizenship for the president, running for president does not have this requirement”.


31 posted on 10/30/2008 11:06:03 AM PDT by Doug TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DaGman

Couldn’t the strategy work in reverse against them though? Since it is a Constitutional issue, it would seem the DNC would have some incentive to do at least the patriotic-looking thing right away.

In other words, the RNC and its surrogates should say, “look, we’re sure Obama is an American citizen, and since He loves the Constitution the way we do, of course, and since he may have to take an oath to defend it, he’ll naturally want to dispel any doubt.”


32 posted on 10/30/2008 11:15:52 AM PDT by farmer18th (George Will: Conservative, as long as the Newsweek People Don't make Fun of Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

O’s trip to Hawaii recently was probably to: 1) tell Grandma what not to say if anyone managed to talk to her and, 2) get Grandma to sign an affadavit saying that he was born in Hawaii. We won’t see it unless some legal authority tries to force him to produce the birth certificate.


33 posted on 10/30/2008 11:18:56 AM PDT by TheCornerOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; Cyber Liberty; Lurker
This is all I've to say about the Annenbergs.
34 posted on 10/30/2008 11:19:58 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DaGman

“Some say this is an issue. I say, the economy, the war on terror, victory in Iraq, immigration, border security are the issues. Not some piece of paper.”

Why do you think the Founding Fathers put this citizenship requirement into the CONSTITUTION? It IS NOT just a piece of paper.


35 posted on 10/30/2008 11:23:21 AM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel (And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th

You tell me. The Governor of Hawaii has refused access to BHO’s vault birth certificate until after the election.


36 posted on 10/30/2008 11:23:52 AM PDT by sportsone234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: murdoog

I wonder if it was allowed to go on too long and the presence of a “Mohammed” makes him look as though he’s ashamed of the birth name.

It might just be standard lawyerly delay though too. I just finished watching “Bleak House,” the story of an estate eaten to nothing by lawyers delaying a ruling, so they could bill time.

Is this very unfair to the current generation of attorneys???

Nah...


37 posted on 10/30/2008 11:32:57 AM PDT by farmer18th (George Will: Conservative, as long as the Newsweek People Don't make Fun of Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Since citizens are sovereign they have all the powers not vested by the Constitution to the government. If the Constitution does not explicitly state a government agency has the charge to check Constitutional qualifications of a candidate, then clearly the responsibility falls on the citizens. Since it is the duty of a citizen to protect and defend the Constitution, and the Constitution states that a president must be a natural born citizen, the citizens have a duty to enforce that rule.

The courts are clearly wrong on this one.


38 posted on 10/30/2008 11:35:28 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DaGman

That means nothing concerning how the joint’s being run.


39 posted on 10/30/2008 11:43:22 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
According to the argument below We The People have the standing! Below is from Family Security Matters - Article

1. The U.S. Constitution is a CONTRACT between The People, The States, and The United States, the federal government, that defines and limits the role of the federal government, and the rights of the States and The People, and, among other things, defines and limits the qualifications for president, i.e., that the president must be over the age of 35 years, and must be a natural born citizen.

2. Any party to a CONTRACT has standing to enforce it. This is as basic as it gets. Contract Law 101. First week of law school stuff. And it seems that lawyers and judges all over the country have forgotten all about it. Also, the Constitution was intended to benefit all American citizens, We, The People, and in basic contract law the intended beneficiaries of a CONTRACT, i.e., us, also have standing to enforce it.

3. If We, The People, do not have standing to enforce the CONTRACT, the U.S. Constitution, then it is unenforceable, and if it is unenforceable it is just a historic curiosity that means nothing. It’s just an old piece of parchment. But that was not the intent, and to give intent to the CONTRACT it must be enforceable by its parties and beneficiaries.

4. We, The People, have standing under the First Amendment "to petition the government for redress of grievances." If we have a grievance that a non-citizen, illegal alien, is running for president, I think the First Amendment unequivocally gives every American citizen standing to sue the government to redress that grievance and enforce the Constitution.

40 posted on 10/30/2008 11:51:20 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson