Posted on 08/03/2008 8:23:43 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Does it say, “Hillary Rodham”?
John Bachelor covered this last hour on his show. The lady is said to be not unknown and born in Hawaii about the same time as he was. Further, the original birth certificate has his adopted name (Barry Sotereo?) and a citizen of Muslim INDONESIA!!
Beat me by a minute:)
The gun- it SMOKES!!!!
Their crystal ball is so good, they even knew more than 40 years ago that they would need this current forgery, so they placed a phony birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper, because they knew then would name their phony candidate Obama.
P.S., this forensic examiner has great credentials, everything but a NAME so we can check him/her out.
Attn all FReepers, make sure we concentrate on this BS so we look like fools and do not debate the real issues of this campaign!
< Sarcasm off! >
We liberals just need to modify the Constitution— problem solved.(//a lib response)
they knew then THEY would
This is KEY- at least for people like me who are not tech savvy:
~snip~
For a quick preview – the original COLB used to create the KOS COLB image belongs to a female and does not belong to Obama. Another follow up report will reveal exactly who the original underlying COLB did belong to. Trust me when I tell you it is going to be one hell of a major twist that no one would have seen coming. I had to quadruple check my results because I did not even believe it and I currently have a few other people double and triple checking my results as well just to be 100% sure.
That said, and in the interest of fairness, if the people responsible for forging the COLB come forward and admit their liability the name of the original COLB owner will not be released publicly. It is only fair to give the guilty parties a chance to take responsibility for their actions before it embarrasses a lot of people and ruins some people’s reputations.
As a heads up to the guilty parties – the names and dates have already been restored – as has the fact the owner is a female born in the 70’s. That is all that will be revealed publicly for now. Besides if I turn up in a ditch someplace the information is already in a few 3rd party hands and they will just release it in my place.
~snip~
Also up and running now on Atlas Shrugs:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/08/previous-owner.html
Good one
BTTT!
So it is the same BC as posted at this link? Are they contacting the writer of this blog? Seems like that would be the person most interested in it if they are any kind of journalist at all.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/06/obama-birth.html
I'm becoming more confident that this will be big enough that even the MSM will start asking the hard questions. As I said above, John Bachelor had a guest who said the birth certificate had his adopted name and was a citizen of Indonesia. They are still working to determine if he had dual citizenship and when or if he gave it up.
Don’t disagree at all, but it is Hillary’s diehards running with this stuff now. Stay on the sidelines, eat some popcorn, and keep our eyes on what the haloed one does and says.
Neither. Scanners don't have perfect repeatability. The images might be similar, but not exact. Even scanning the same document twice on the same scanner will not produce "exact same" images. The untrained eye might have trouble spotting the differences, but image processing will find many subtle differences.
"Even though the scanners may be using different software to acquire the images, the scanned images would all still look the same."
I disagree again, and could go on for several paragraphs about that, discussing illumination, drivers, default settings, etc.
So, if the original owner of the birth certificate is “someone who is not unknown” and “a jaw dropper” — wonder who it is??
Pamela Geller is a smart cookie- she’s checked techdude out carefully and after reading his intro- he’s not messing around and isn’t some kid in the basement.
He means business. AND- he’s told other people and documented everything to cover himself. He’s going to go public.
Admittedly the “study” of a jpg scan of a piece of paperwork is of little value.
By the same token why is it so difficult for the Obama staff to produce a birth CERTIFICATE? One with the parents names, etc.?
I'm torn between having this pushed to the max or letting is simmer until just after the convention. If it blows up before the convention in a convincing way that gets MSM attention, we may actually end up with Hillary as the Rat nominee (shudder!).
Hillary’s lady appointment secretary and rumored partner (forget her name)?
Huma
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.