heheheee!
Posted on 07/23/2008 12:40:56 PM PDT by Polarik
I found these posts on a pro-Hillary board:
Mr. Obama bailed out of FEC federal funding of his campaign in the same week or so that his campaign put up the “Fight The Smears” website, of which it appears the only significant real issue they engaged was his birth legend. They put up the forged low resolution image of a Hawaiian “Certificate of Live Birth”. Was it only a coincidence in timing?
One thing the FEC is required to do — if Obama had accepted the funds — is prove his eligibility. Obama would have had to provide proof of where his was born, and his parent’s citizenship and marriage status. He didn’t accept, they didn’t vette.
Challenging a candidate’s eligibility to be on the ballot is a state by state thing. A citizen has to challenge in the courts. The State officials (at least the ones I am aware of) do not vett. Vett means to research, to challenge, to demand proof, to validate the proof provided. Must be a citizen or party challenge in the courts.”
______________________________________
How to challenge Obama’s eligibility in your state:
Call the secretary of state’s office and ask how you go about challenging a candidate’s eligibility to be on the ballot in your state-specifically citizenship eligibility.
__________________________________________
I think the larger issue is committing fraud by presenting a forgery as an accurate document copy.
Well, they now have no answers for the fact that the KOS COLB is a mirror image of the DeCosta COLB, in terms of its printed components, and it could notr have occurred without the intervention of a forger.
Tell me what you really think about her ... uh, on second thought, don’t go there.
heheheee!
I knew you shouldn’t ‘go there’. [fleeing the thread]
hahahahaaaa!
Playin’ Ketchup here.
My ‘puter monitor croaked Wednesday nite.
I couldn’t find another one until this morning on the
way to work.
Wal-Mart doesn’t sell the big hefty mama’s anymore...just
the flat screens now.
I hadda go to a Mom & Pop ‘puter place to get a used one
to replace mine.
“Playin’ Ketchup here.”
I guess that’s what Obama does at abortion ‘clinics’
Ah gess so. :)
I just came upon this thread this morning. It appears I must apologize. I’m the FReeper who posted the Atlas article here on FR. I hadn’t a clue about it’s origins obviously. I came upon it on Stumble and thought it had merit.
“As a heads up to the guilty parties – the names and dates have already been restored – as has the fact the owner is a female born in the 70’s. That is all that will be revealed publicly for now. Besides if I turn up in a ditch someplace the information is already in a few 3rd party hands and they will just release it in my place.
If anyone still believes the KOS COLB is legitimate after reading this article they should seriously think about seeking professional help.”
From txdarlings site.
“Obama Refuses to Answer Birth Certificate Lawsuit”
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_birth_certificate/2008/10/24/143882.html
The part about the “African” entry for race instead of Negro may have been answered by factcheck, unless Negro or Colored were the only options allowed at that time.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
ke
When the COLB was printed determines what word the Census Bureau used for African-American US Citizens only.
The COLB was allegedly printed in 2007, so BLACK would have been used if Obama Sr. was a US citizen. But, since he was an African national, AFRICAN is what was used.
That clears up some confusion on that one. Assuming Sr. (and others from Africa) or the state tended to identify their race (as opposed to nationality) on COLBs as "African". White nationals from Africa probably would have identified their race as White or Caucasian. Do/did they go by the continent they were from or by their skin color? And did states allow for "Other" and an applicant's fill-in for race as claimed by the factcheck article? In this case Sr's supposed choice of "African"?
The rest of the evidence for forgery is plenty convincing anyway regardless. But since this is a key argument from other blogger sites/sources for forgery, I believe its crucial that it be proven or eliminated so that what is presented is credible.
Judge rejects Montco lawyer’s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
...
In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.
Surrick ruled that Berg’s attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were “frivolous and not worthy of discussion.”
The judge also said the harm Berg alleged did “not constitute an injury in fact” and Berg’s arguments to the contrary “ventured into the unreasonable.”
For example, Berg had claimed that Obama’s nomination deprived citizens of voting for Sen. Hillary Clinton in November. (Berg backed Clinton in the primaries.)
Berg could not be reached for comment last night.
Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, and the campaign posted a document issued by Hawaii on its Web site, fight thesmears.com, confirming his birth there.
Berg said in court papers that the image was a forgery.
The nonpartisan Web site FactCheck.org examined the original document and said it was legitimate.
Further, a birth announcement in the Aug. 13, 1961, Honolulu Advertiser listed Obama’s birth there on Aug. 4. *
WRONG. The Fight the Smears website posted a copy of a forged image. There is no proof of Obama's birth in Hawaii.
Berg said in court papers that the image was a forgery.
And Berg is 100% correct: the image IS a forgery.
The nonpartisan Web site FactCheck.org examined the original document and said it was legitimate. FactCheck is pro-Obama and definitely NOT nonpartisan. They are a primary suspect in the Obama birth certificate fraud.
Further, a birth announcement in the Aug. 13, 1961, Honolulu Advertiser listed Obama’s birth there on Aug. 4.
WRONG again. this "birth announcement" was a small, fuzzy, black & white image that not only has inconsistencies in it, but is 100 times easier to forge than the highly-detailed color COLB.
In short, the evidence that Obama's COLB image and the Honolulu Advertiser image are both fakes and forgeries, designed to cover up the fact that Obama has no birth record in Hawaii.
Help me out here. Can Governor Lingle do something a-la “Executive Order”....with regards to a birth certificate ( or verifying the lack thereof )...?
She does not need to do that to get a "Letter of Verification."
Now if the OHSM won't even do that, then she can play the "Executive Order" card.
I wish I were an agency head.
I cannot fathom why the GOP has not requested it, or any one of the Supervisors of Election around the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
