Posted on 06/15/2006 8:02:42 PM PDT by FortRumbull
Adopted by the Executive Committee on January 26, 2006
WHEREAS, eminent domain is a fundamental and necessary power of government, and
WHEREAS, the purpose of eminent domain is to allow governments to undertake projects that benefit the whole community, while providing just compensation to property owners for the value of their property, and
WHEREAS, throughout American history, federal, state and local governments; have used eminent domain to promote the Nations social and economic welfare with the construction of such essential projects as roads, bridges and schools, and WHEREAS, eminent domain is also critically important for municipalities to promote sensible land use, revitalize distressed communities, clean up polluted land, build new infrastructure, and alleviate the problems of unemp loyment and economic distress by fostering economic development, and WHEREAS, economic development, which provides jobs and opportunity to communities, is a fundamental duty of local governments, and
WHEREAS, one of the biggest obstacles to the revitalization of our metropolitan areas, which include center cities and older inner-ring suburbs where more than 80 percent of the nations population resides, is the difficulty of assembling parcels of land of sufficient size to allow for new economic development, and the creation of affordable housing, and
WHEREAS, the absence of appropriate sites often limits opportunities to foster economic development and create affordable housing in places where needs are most significant, and
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Courts decision in KELO v. New London has resulted in the examination of the use of eminent domain for economic development at the local, state and Federal levels, and
WHEREAS, governments should only exercise the power of the eminent domain to achieve important public development objectives that benefit the community, and
WHEREAS, most private property acquisitions by the government are voluntary, and
WHEREAS, powers of eminent domain are rarely exercised and are only used by the government as a tool of last resort, and
WHEREAS state and local laws should address protections to individuals regarding the use of eminent domain, and
WHEREAS, there are a number of tax benefits often desired by property owners under the threat of eminent domain, and
WHEREAS, the Congress has limited the use of some federal funds in connection with state and local economic development projects involving eminent domain and provided for a study by the Government Accountability Office on the use of eminent domain,
NOW THEEFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that under our federal system the use of eminent domain by state and local governments is fundamentally a state and local matter and should be addressed by state and local political processes that respond to distinctly local needs and conditions, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Federal government should not take any additional action to alter the rules governing the use of eminent domain until it has received the Government Accountability Office report and held comprehensive hearings.
Submitted by:
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, New York, New York
Mayor Gavin Newsom, San Francisco, California
Mayor Heather Fargo, Sacramento, California
Mayor Thomas M. Menino, Boston, Massachusetts
Mayor John Hickenlooper, Denver, Colorado
Mayor Ron Gonzales, San Jose, California
Mayor Rocky Anderson, Salt Lake City, Utah
Mayor James Brainard, Carmel, Indiana
Mayor Shelia Young, San Leandro, California
Mayor Richard M. Daley, Chicago, Illinois
Mayor Michael A. Guido, Dearborn, Michigan
Mayor John F. Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Mayor Manuel A. Diaz, Miami, Florida
Mayor Mick Cornett, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Mayor Kay Barnes, Kansas City, Missouri
Mayor Martin OMalley, Baltimore, Maryland
Mayor Joseph P. Riley, Charleston, South Carolina
Mayor David N. Cicilline, Providence, Rhode Island
Mayor John M. Fabrizi, Bridgeport, Connecticut
Our rights shrink in direct proportion to increases in government power.
The weird thing is how the process has speeded up under Republican leadership.
These guys just don't get it.
Yes, and yes. Dammit.
Although the USSC ruling applied to the states especially. In any case, the state legislatures can prevent this, if they've a mind, as can the city councils. I don't think the citizenry is as upset about eminent domains as they ought to be, but that could change if there are enough more abuses of it. OTOH, the citizenry has in large part forgotten the ideals on which our country was founded, individual freedom and personal liberty.
So many lies in one short document. Who wrote this -- Bill Clinton?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.