Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Conference of Mayors-Resolution supporting Eminent Domain
U.S. Conference of Mayors ^ | Jan. 26, 2006 | Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg & Mayor Richard M. Daley

Posted on 06/15/2006 8:02:42 PM PDT by FortRumbull

Adopted by the Executive Committee on January 26, 2006

WHEREAS, eminent domain is a fundamental and necessary power of government, and

WHEREAS, the purpose of eminent domain is to allow governments to undertake projects that benefit the whole community, while providing just compensation to property owners for the value of their property, and

WHEREAS, throughout American history, federal, state and local governments; have used eminent domain to promote the Nation’s social and economic welfare with the construction of such essential projects as roads, bridges and schools, and WHEREAS, eminent domain is also critically important for municipalities to promote sensible land use, revitalize distressed communities, clean up polluted land, build new infrastructure, and alleviate the problems of unemp loyment and economic distress by fostering economic development, and WHEREAS, economic development, which provides jobs and opportunity to communities, is a fundamental duty of local governments, and

WHEREAS, one of the biggest obstacles to the revitalization of our metropolitan areas, which include center cities and older inner-ring suburbs where more than 80 percent of the nation’s population resides, is the difficulty of assembling parcels of land of sufficient size to allow for new economic development, and the creation of affordable housing, and

WHEREAS, the absence of appropriate sites often limits opportunities to foster economic development and create affordable housing in places where needs are most significant, and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in KELO v. New London has resulted in the examination of the use of eminent domain for economic development at the local, state and Federal levels, and

WHEREAS, governments should only exercise the power of the eminent domain to achieve important public development objectives that benefit the community, and

WHEREAS, most private property acquisitions by the government are voluntary, and

WHEREAS, powers of eminent domain are rarely exercised and are only used by the government as a tool of last resort, and

WHEREAS state and local laws should address protections to individuals regarding the use of eminent domain, and

WHEREAS, there are a number of tax benefits often desired by property owners under the threat of eminent domain, and

WHEREAS, the Congress has limited the use of some federal funds in connection with state and local economic development projects involving eminent domain and provided for a study by the Government Accountability Office on the use of eminent domain,

NOW THEEFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that under our federal system the use of eminent domain by state and local governments is fundamentally a state and local matter and should be addressed by state and local political processes that respond to distinctly local needs and conditions, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Federal government should not take any additional action to alter the rules governing the use of eminent domain until it has received the Government Accountability Office report and held comprehensive hearings.

Submitted by:

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, New York, New York

Mayor Gavin Newsom, San Francisco, California

Mayor Heather Fargo, Sacramento, California

Mayor Thomas M. Menino, Boston, Massachusetts

Mayor John Hickenlooper, Denver, Colorado

Mayor Ron Gonzales, San Jose, California

Mayor Rocky Anderson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Mayor James Brainard, Carmel, Indiana

Mayor Shelia Young, San Leandro, California

Mayor Richard M. Daley, Chicago, Illinois

Mayor Michael A. Guido, Dearborn, Michigan

Mayor John F. Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Mayor Manuel A. Diaz, Miami, Florida

Mayor Mick Cornett, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Mayor Kay Barnes, Kansas City, Missouri

Mayor Martin O’Malley, Baltimore, Maryland

Mayor Joseph P. Riley, Charleston, South Carolina

Mayor David N. Cicilline, Providence, Rhode Island

Mayor John M. Fabrizi, Bridgeport, Connecticut


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; govwatch; kelo; propertyrights; scotus

1 posted on 06/15/2006 8:02:45 PM PDT by FortRumbull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FortRumbull

Our rights shrink in direct proportion to increases in government power.

The weird thing is how the process has speeded up under Republican leadership.


2 posted on 06/15/2006 8:11:21 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Delicacy, precision, force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FortRumbull
There you have it ~ a list of all the major fascist politicians in the country who are not already in the House or Senate.

These guys just don't get it.

3 posted on 06/15/2006 8:37:34 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Our rights shrink in direct proportion to increases in government power. The weird thing is how the process has speeded up under Republican leadership.

Yes, and yes. Dammit.

4 posted on 06/16/2006 3:00:59 AM PDT by backhoe ("It's so Easy to spend somebody else's Money..."[ My Dad. circa 1958 ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Whereas in most cases the Federal government is only entitle to regulate eminent domain when it is the Feds who are doing the taking. The states regulate what the cities can use their eminent domain for.
5 posted on 06/16/2006 3:23:30 AM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: old republic

Although the USSC ruling applied to the states especially. In any case, the state legislatures can prevent this, if they've a mind, as can the city councils. I don't think the citizenry is as upset about eminent domains as they ought to be, but that could change if there are enough more abuses of it. OTOH, the citizenry has in large part forgotten the ideals on which our country was founded, individual freedom and personal liberty.


6 posted on 06/16/2006 4:10:16 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Delicacy, precision, force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FortRumbull

So many lies in one short document. Who wrote this -- Bill Clinton?


7 posted on 06/29/2006 8:48:27 AM PDT by steve-b (Hoover Dam is every bit as "natural" as a beaver dam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson