Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last stand for property-rights activists
Christian Science Monitor ^ | June 08, 2006 | Warren Richey

Posted on 06/07/2006 8:41:28 PM PDT by FortRumbull

The showdown in New London, Conn., over the city's seizure of homes to make way for private development is entering its final and contentious chapter.

Seven longtime residents of the city's Fort Trumbull neighborhood took their battle to save their homes all the way to the US Supreme Court. Now, nearly a year after the high court upheld the city's eminent domain power in a controversial 5-to-4 decision, two families are still fighting eviction. Efforts to negotiate a compromise appear to have ended.

On Monday, the New London City Council voted 5 to 2 to authorize the city attorney to obtain a court order to seize and demolish the homes of Susette Kelo and Michael Cristofaro.

Ms. Kelo's pink cottage at 8 East Street and Mr. Cristofaro's house a few blocks away have become symbols of defiance for property rights activists nationwide. And it is unclear what might happen should bulldozers suddenly arrive in the neighborhood.

"If I have to handcuff myself to the house I am willing to do that," says Mr. Cristofaro. "My father is 81 years old and he says he will cuff himself to the house."

Supporters have been phoning nonstop from around the country, Cristofaro says. Some are pledging to form a protective human chain around his home, if necessary.

New London Mayor Elizabeth Sabilia says it is time for the city to move forward with its plan to develop the proposed hotel and office complex. "We're seeking possession of the property," she says.

But the mayor adds that the council is still open to negotiations. "If they want to keep talking about it, we will," she says. "What is not an option is returning the deed to the former owners."

The ordeal has not been easy on anyone in the city. Mayor Sabilia says she and other council members have received death threats. But she says most New London residents support the development plan.

Cristofaro disputes this. "I want to know who is this silent majority that keeps telling [the council] I need to go," he says.

By moving forward with condemnation proceedings, the City Council rejected a compromise suggested by Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell. The governor's plan called for moving Cristofaro's home close to Ms. Kelo's and then allowing the rest of the development to continue around them.

But the mayor and a majority of councilmembers objected because it would allow Kelo and Cristofaro to regain their deeds and thus regain legal control of their properties.

Scott Bullock, a lawyer with the Institute for Justice, a Virginia-based public interest law firm representing the homeowners, says the city's vote on Monday was a raw exercise of power. "It was thumbing their nose at the governor and at the nation," he says. "No city government should put their citizens through this for the benefit of private developers."

Mr. Bullock says he will consult with Kelo and Cristofaro to determine how best to respond to actions by the city.

Matt Dery says one of the reasons he agreed to leave two weeks ago was that his mother had lived her entire life in a house at 28 East Street and was not interested in living elsewhere.

Last March, she passed away in the same bedroom where she had been born 88 years earlier.

Dery says if given a choice, he would prefer to stay. But he says he feels like the city is holding a gun to his head.

This week, Dery, his wife, and his 87-year-old father, began looking for a new home outside New London. He says "settlement" isn't the correct word for his dealings with the city. "We don't have a choice," he says. "We are on the end of somebody's boot."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: ct; eminentdomain; kelo; scotus

1 posted on 06/07/2006 8:41:31 PM PDT by FortRumbull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Ping


2 posted on 06/07/2006 9:26:35 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (That's taxes, not Texas. I have no beef with TX. NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FortRumbull

bttttttttttt


3 posted on 06/07/2006 9:49:04 PM PDT by ellery (ent foThe true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

4 posted on 06/07/2006 10:31:55 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

Why is the state legislature just sitting there allowing this amoral and clearly unconstitutional act to happen? The US Supreme Court was wrong and the state legislature needs to take action to right the wrong that the federal court would not.


5 posted on 06/08/2006 5:30:42 AM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: old republic; BlackElk
Why is the state legislature just sitting there allowing this amoral and clearly unconstitutional act to happen?

CT Governors of the last 20 years:

O'Neill (Dem) Weicker (Weickercrat Party) Rowland (RINO) Rell (uber RINO)
6 posted on 06/08/2006 11:51:34 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FortRumbull
So... we can VOTE to take away each others property now? What kind of effed up, Commie BS is that?

They cannot be allowed to get away with this. Not if we still want to pretend we live in a free country.

7 posted on 06/08/2006 12:00:39 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old republic

One word: corruption. There is too much money in eminent domain, too many kickbacks and bribes. Why should a developer pay full price when he can grease a politician and get a bargain?


8 posted on 06/08/2006 3:27:28 PM PDT by FortRumbull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: LibertyisSpecial; BlackElk

Scott is selling real estate and is prsona non grata in the GOP. He sometimes does radio still.


10 posted on 06/14/2006 6:54:06 PM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson