Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google Agrees to Censor Results in China
Breitbart ^ | 01/24/2006 | MICHAEL LIEDTKE

Posted on 01/24/2006 4:42:16 PM PST by Salo

Online search engine leader Google Inc. has agreed to censor its results in China, adhering to the country's free-speech restrictions in return for better access in the Internet's fastest growing market.

The Mountain View, Calif.-based company planned to roll out a new version of its search engine bearing China's Web suffix ".cn," on Wednesday. A Chinese-language version of Google's search engine has previously been available through the company's dot-com address in the United States.

By creating a unique address for China, Google hopes to make its search engine more widely available and easier to use in the world's most populous country.

Because of government barriers set up to suppress information, Google's China users previously have been blocked from using the search engine or encountered lengthy delays in response time.

The service troubles have frustrated many Chinese users, hobbling Google's efforts to expand its market share in a country that expected to emerge as an Internet gold mine over the next decade.

China already has more than 100 million Web surfers and the audience is expected to swell substantially _ an alluring prospect for Google as it tries to boost its already rapidly rising profits.

Baidu.com Inc., a Beijing-based company in which Google owns a 2.6 percent stake, currently runs China's most popular search engine. But a recent Keynote Systems survey of China's Internet preferences concluded that Baidu remains vulnerable to challenges from Google and Yahoo Inc.

To obtain the Chinese license, Google agreed to omit Web content that the country's government finds objectionable. Google will base its censorship decisons on guidance provided by Chinese government officials.

Although China has loosened some of its controls in recent years, some topics, such as Taiwan's independence and 1989's Tiananmen Square massacre, remain forbidden subjects.

Google officials characterized the censorship concessions in China as an excruciating decision for a company that adopted "don't be evil" as a motto. But management believes it's a worthwhile sacrifice.

"We firmly believe, with our culture of innovation, Google can make meaningful and positive contributions to the already impressive pace of development in China," said Andrew McLaughlin, Google's senior policy counsel.

Google's decision rankled Reporters Without Borders, a media watchdog group that has sharply criticized Internet companies including Yahoo and Microsoft Corp.'s MSN.com for submitting to China's censorship regime.

"This is a real shame," said Julien Pain, head of Reporters Without Borders' Internet desk. "When a search engine collaborates with the government like this, it makes it much easier for the Chinese government to control what is being said on the Internet."

When Google censors results in China, it intends to post notifications alerting users that some content has been removed _ to comply with local laws. The company provides similar alerts in Germany and France when, to comply with national laws, it censors results to remove references to Nazi paraphernalia.

Google is cooperating with China's government at the same time it is battling the U.S. government over a subpoena seeking a breakdown of one week's worth of search requests _ a list that would cover millions of terms.

Reflecting its uneasy alliance with the Chinese government, Google isn't releasing all its services.

Neither Google's e-mail nor blogging services will be offered in China because the company doesn't want to risk being ordered by the government to turn over anyone's personal information. The e-mail service, called Gmail, creates a huge database of users' messages and makes them instantly searchable. The blogging services contain a wide range of personal background.

Yahoo came under fire last year after it provided the government with the e-mail account information of a Chinese journalist who was later convicted for violating state secrecy laws.

Initially, Google's Chinese service will be limited to searching Web pages and images. The company also will provide local search results and a special edition of its news service that will be confined to government-sanctioned media.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: censorship; china; disgusting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
I guess Google can serve ar China's memory hole. Do no evil? My ass.
1 posted on 01/24/2006 4:42:18 PM PST by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; N3WBI3; Ernest_at_the_Beach

tech pings.


2 posted on 01/24/2006 4:42:53 PM PST by Salo (He hath touched me with his noodly appendage. Ramen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Ah, but when it comes to American pedophiles, Google suddenly develops a spine.


3 posted on 01/24/2006 4:43:56 PM PST by denydenydeny ("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo
This the same company that just said screw you to the US government when it came to getting data for a child porn case? Then they turn around and kiss the PRC's despotic behind?
4 posted on 01/24/2006 4:44:53 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo

So much for the wish that freedom brought by the internet, will change the Chinese leadership styles.


5 posted on 01/24/2006 4:45:37 PM PST by jeremiah (People wake up, the water is getting hot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Q. How can you tell when a Google press spokesperson is lying when explaining their cooperation with Chinese censorship?

A. Their lips are moving.

I'm going to check out MSN Search. Google is now on a list that includes Progressive Insurance (i.e., not worth my dollar or my time.)
6 posted on 01/24/2006 4:48:08 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salo

China's search engine censorship continues [The 'noble' Google cooperates]
Pandia ^ | undated | Lars Våge
Posted on 01/23/2006 1:04:45 AM EST by Hacksaw
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563084/posts


7 posted on 01/24/2006 4:48:28 PM PST by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

MSN is just as bad.


8 posted on 01/24/2006 4:49:13 PM PST by Salo (He hath touched me with his noodly appendage. Ramen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salo
I have stopped using Google entirely for this and other reasons. I use A9.com and thereby get a discount on my Amazon purchases. I see no real diference in the quality and breadth of my search results.

Another gripe against Google.

It is curious -- perhaps not really -- that on Google Earth's map of the Middle East, every nation is listed except for one. Can you guess which one it is? google earth Middle east

They have become a powerful, arrogant, leftt-wing colossus. I will no longer patronize them.

9 posted on 01/24/2006 4:54:44 PM PST by Blennos (Baton Rouge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo
Someone explain this to me:

1. Google resists turning informations over to the U.S. Gov't.

2. Google gives in to the Chinese gov't's demands.

Is it just me, or is there a problem here?

10 posted on 01/24/2006 4:57:04 PM PST by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Yes and as more and more of those 1.3 billion wild and crazy Chinese google down and that rénmínbì starts rolling in by the billions and billions the Chi-coms will say,

"Excuse me google, but the freedom-loving democratic People's Republic of China finds your anti-socialist search results in the U.S. objectionable "

And once again from one of the company's executives' fleet of wide-body Boeing airliners will come this, "'We firmly believe, with our culture of innovation, Google can make meaningful and positive contributions to the already impressive pace of development in China,' said Andrew McLaughlin, Google's senior policy counsel. Therefore. . . . "

11 posted on 01/24/2006 5:05:35 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

Do you mean Bahrain? (sarcasm)


12 posted on 01/24/2006 5:24:00 PM PST by mbx1231
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

So, you post a link to a google map of Saudi Arabia and complain about the lack of detail for Israel? I've got my own problems with google but that ain't one of them. Google did in fact agree not to show a high level of detail of several sites in Israel that are militarily sensitive. If they were anti-Israel, would they have done so?


13 posted on 01/24/2006 5:28:49 PM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jess35
It was not a map of Saudi Arabia. It was a map of the "Middle East" with every country, small and large, explicitly listed except for Israel. The land is showing, but the name is ... forgotten.
14 posted on 01/24/2006 5:46:42 PM PST by Blennos (Baton Rouge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

Thanks for the A9.com tip...as soon as I read this I uninstalled my Google toolbar, will not use their search engine, and hope their stock value drops like a rock. This disgusting affront to freedom and democracy deserves the harshest response from citizens of the free world. It's very simple - use an alternate search engine, it won't kill you, at the worst maybe it'll add .00001 seconds to your search result time.


15 posted on 01/24/2006 5:54:53 PM PST by spoolmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Google already censors info in this country if they don't like the content. I use Clusty. Seems to do the job just fine.


16 posted on 01/24/2006 6:17:25 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salo

Pathetic action by google!


17 posted on 01/24/2006 6:19:52 PM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

actually I can list three on that map that aren't named if you really want to know..

Bahrain
Israel (which was probably your point)
Sudan


18 posted on 01/24/2006 6:21:50 PM PST by MikefromOhio (The Pot is complaining about the Kettle's complexion....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salo
Google officials characterized the censorship concessions in China as an excruciating decision for a company that adopted "don't be evil" as a motto. But management believes it's a worthwhile sacrifice.

Money talks. Everyone has their price and Google just found theirs. Sold what was left of their liberal soul. I can't imagine screwing over their users by not letting them find the truth. Whatever happened to integrity? What a bunch of phonies.

19 posted on 01/24/2006 6:23:57 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Google already censors info in this country if they don't like the content. I use Clusty. Seems to do the job just fine.

So they have started their foray into information control for Americans? I seem to recall a remark about one of their big shots saying that he wants to make sure only "good" or "the right" information gets to Google users. That's quite all right, I'll just use Dogpile and Mapquest (instead of Google and maps.google.com) from now on...

20 posted on 01/24/2006 6:40:51 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Jack Murtha: America's best-known EX-marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson