Posted on 07/25/2005 3:28:22 PM PDT by moutland
Hugh Hewitt condemns Tom Tancredo as a "fringe nut", then plants lips on CAIR spokesman's behind.
"When some people disagree with me, I try to change their minds.
When [Hugh Hewitt] disagrees with me, I rethink my position."
I agree!!! Hugh should start doing some homework!
Hang in there. I think you did good. As cripplecreek said elsewhere: Hugh is just mad that he is wrong about how many conservatives agree with Tom on illegal immigration.
That is not an accurate quote, just sort of paraphrased. My apologies to cripplecreek.
I intend to continue listening to Hewitt unless he intends to continue insulting me.
I didn't hear about Hewitt, whom I never listen to, attacking Tancredo. I do recall that some years ago the popular Bill O'Reilly lashed out for no reason at then Senator Helms just to show that O'Reilly was no "right-winger" and a real "independent." I never listened to O'Reilly again and would never turn on his overrated program.
Since I had been listening to him online for I don't know how long, I feel very insulted right now and will not put up with it.
Thanks for the link. I've bookmarked it.
Here's a better one:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1232125/posts
Hugh is not series..
In the run-up to Bush's Supreme Court picks, Hewitt touted several nominees but was conspicuously silent on Janice Rogers Brown. I e-mailed him inquiring about this and received no reply. Plus the guy is a big fan of (R)nold, and his babbling about the "center-right" gets tiresome. He's no Rush or Laura, that's for sure.
But being a gun-grabber does.
Being a good guy and being even remotely conservative are certainly not exclusive.
I must take issue on this. The founders intentionally worded the Constitution as simple as possible, for very good reason. For instance, "shall not be infringed" means exactly that. It does not mean "may be infringed if Sarah Brady is afraid of it". It means what it means.
This does not mean that good conservatives can disagree on other issues, but when it comes to the Constitution, any intelligent reader can determine the founders' intent simply by reading it literally.
Hugh Hewitt, as I recall, was all FOR the nuclear option. He was all over Frist in the spring for not implementing it.
Politics is the art of the possible. Hugh presents all sides, and his opinion is usually right on. Tancredo is a surly little punk.
Hugh is an open borders zealot. An amnesty fool. Same as all the other bigtime GOP stooges. Of course, when you live in yuppie Irvine and teach at Chapman College your ivory tower keeps you from having to mingle with the results of your "compassion". Immigration is at the root of Hewitt's mudslinging Tancredo.
New York. Figures. Texans usually aren't that stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.