THAT is scary :/
Posted on 03/22/2013 6:42:33 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Four years ago today, on St. Patrick’s Day 2009, Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (Ret.) filed a criminal complaint of treasonagainst Barack Hussein Obama after he allowed U.S. Army soldiers to deploy into Samson, AL to perform law enforcement duties in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, which the Army Inspector General confirmed several months later after completing its investigation.
The Post & Email can report that a group of Obama supporters at “The Fogbow” includes an attorney working in the White House by his own admission.
Trolls who have reportedly been paid to post Obama-supportive and distracting comments register at various websites under multiple screen names and IPs, including at The Post & Email. Three months after Obama took office, Fox News reported“a plague of internet ‘trolls’ — troublemakers who work to derail cyber-conversations through harassing and inflammatory posts.”
As reported previously by The Post & Email, some of these trolls have perpetrated payment scams which Paypal has detected as fraudulent after launching its own investigations. Death threats have been made against Fitzpatrick, this writer, Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Michael Zullo, Pastor Carl Gallups and others, death threats which are now under scrutiny.
White House involvement in the Madisonville hoax and other criminal acts of political activism is now in the hands of law enforcement who are uniquely positioned to act.
(Excerpt) Read more at thejaghunter.wordpress.com ...
“Well, this explains a lot of the goings on the the last week!”
It explains more than that. It explains, for example, why some get the vapors over the mere mention of Fogbowers in our midst.
Look at it this way. Suppose you are a liberal on a conservative site, arguing for the avowed liberal position of ‘soil-only’. If by some/any means you can pass yourself off as a conservative, your argument stands a far better chance than otherwise.
Iow, if you came right out & said, “I am a bat-crap crazy ultra-lib leftist from the moonbat-central site known as Fogbow, & I am here to tell you that if you don’t accept my position of ‘soil-only’ you are a MOron’, you fail. But, if you can pass yourself off, even if only by hiding/disavowing your Fogbow ties, as a presumed conservative, you stand at least a chance.
So it makes perfect sense that some on FR would freak out over the mention of Fogbowers in our midst. The more we talk about them, the likelier most are to recognize both them & their Alinsky tactics. That spells doom for their cause, so they attempt to suppress discussion of their existence by whatever means they can.
Note to Nat (I know you’re still reading): accusing me of being crazy just for noting the presence (on FR) of Foggers is a losing strategy. The Foggers are so obvious, it requires considerably more crazy to overlook them than to acknowledge them.
I’ve noticed that they’re fond of the fallacy of the undistributed middle when trying to divert from their true persona.
You're right.
I noticed a lot of the 'you're no conservative!' and 'you're trying to destroy the Constitution!' accusations flying around.
How better to pretend to represent the conservative position than to vehemently accuse everyone who disagrees with you of NOT being one?
Alinsky....pure & simple.
That is a keen observation. Otoh, were we to attempt to catalogue all the soil-only proponents’ irrationalities, inconsistencies and logic-fails, we would be at it all day. Neither common sense nor logic are their strong suits. In fact, it sometimes seems the less logical a position is, the more strongly they embrace it.
Hmmm. Who else is known for this propensity. Why, liberals are, that’s who.
Oh really, which one?
Correct. I believe the ‘Rule’ in question is #11, as explicated on the Townhall site:
“11) If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside. The winner in politics is almost always whoever is on offense. Liberals understand this in an intuitive way that most conservatives don’t. We think because we have this wonderful, honest, logical response to a charge that we’re scoring major points — but, except in rare cases, it’s not true. If you’re spending all of your time refuting the charges that you’re extreme, racist, hate women, [are trying to destroy the Constitution], and despise the poor — you’re losing. That’s because some people will assume where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and disbelieve you no matter how good your explanation may be. Additionally, if you’re busy defending yourself, you can’t go after the other side. Defend when you absolutely have to, but make sure most of your time is spent attacking, relentlessly attacking.”
(Note: bracketed words are mine/yours.)
As to Birthers specifically, I see them in the same light as 9/11 Truthers.
9/11 truthers ... is there a set of premises which define that group, that you would share with us?
Well, I’ve seen you as a RINO who should have been zotted many moons ago.
A lot of folks here consider me to be a RINO because they focus only on those areas with which they disagree. However, I’m as legit a conservative as anyone here, as my overall posts show.
Whatever...
Thanks for confessing your dementia, but your mental state is such that your confession may not be admissible.
You need to be zotted clean for your own good, then we can proceed to trial.
And I happen to believe that islamoslime took over two large planes which were flown into the trade center towers. But I have scrutinized video and done the math which indicate that something other than a pancake collapse occurred to remove the towers and have them basically blow away down the Hudson River.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt and just believe you are ignorant of the truth regarding the collapse of the damaged towers. Since you cannot show how these 110 story buildings collapse at just at the speed of gravity (pancake 80 stories at freefall speed, then you can insult my science), and since I have no solid proof of what was used to dustify the buildings so that they essentially blew away, we will not reach an agreement of just how the magic was accomplished.
But you can play the video for yourself and time the collapse. A bowling ball drops at about the same rate the towers appeared to come down. That is impossible with a pancake collapse.
And if you stammer that debris was hauled away for months, I will also prove that dirt by the dumptruck convoy loads was trucked in and dumped then hauled away, for a month, and that the debris left from the controlled dropping of bldg 7 took about the entre time of clean up, so there is all the cover needed to fool people like you who do not go beyond the official lies they are fed.
And a couple of more points: the 'truther' movement is working to deflect attention from the real facts regarding the tragedy. Why would someone want to mount such a massive disinformation diversion? Whomever is behind the foolishness knows full well that Americans believe Saudis committed the terrible acts of the planes into the towers. But these same Americans have been diverted from looking more closely at the fatcs of the collapses; and what would a million tons of collapsing debris have done to the bathtube which prevents the river from flooding Manhattan? And if you don't know what the bathtube is, then you are a million miles from comprehending what took place on 9/11.
lol !
I don’t think I’d admit to getting dumped by an arab. (after the age of 8 anyway)
But that’s just me...
Yeah, they burn my skin, seriously!
Whatever they are...
And mannerisms and speech patterns and there is familial resemblence in at least one of his daughters.
I was in mid-dismount at the time, with my right foot above her rump. Not exactly a good position for staying on...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.