Posted on 03/22/2013 6:42:33 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Four years ago today, on St. Patrick’s Day 2009, Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (Ret.) filed a criminal complaint of treasonagainst Barack Hussein Obama after he allowed U.S. Army soldiers to deploy into Samson, AL to perform law enforcement duties in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, which the Army Inspector General confirmed several months later after completing its investigation.
The Post & Email can report that a group of Obama supporters at “The Fogbow” includes an attorney working in the White House by his own admission.
Trolls who have reportedly been paid to post Obama-supportive and distracting comments register at various websites under multiple screen names and IPs, including at The Post & Email. Three months after Obama took office, Fox News reported“a plague of internet ‘trolls’ — troublemakers who work to derail cyber-conversations through harassing and inflammatory posts.”
As reported previously by The Post & Email, some of these trolls have perpetrated payment scams which Paypal has detected as fraudulent after launching its own investigations. Death threats have been made against Fitzpatrick, this writer, Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Michael Zullo, Pastor Carl Gallups and others, death threats which are now under scrutiny.
White House involvement in the Madisonville hoax and other criminal acts of political activism is now in the hands of law enforcement who are uniquely positioned to act.
(Excerpt) Read more at thejaghunter.wordpress.com ...
Apparently not...
A good part of learning to ride is learning to fall. I watched Ian Miller, Olympic Show Jumper from Canada, face the exact—the completely exact—scenario that ruined Christopher Reeve for life. Miller rolled into the fall and used his momentum to come back up onto his feet on the far side of the jump. He proffered a bow to the crowd and received sustained, thunderous applause. Horse people appreciate a good fall every bit as much as a rider staying in the saddle. Miller avoided potential cataclysmic disaster, and he did it w style—& the crowd went wild.
None of which is to say, Mr Rogers, that you could have fallen better in your particular situation. Sometimes you are just going to get hurt and there’s no way around it. I’m three-quarters through the autobiography of one of the world’s great show jumpers...meaning I’m almost to the part where he breaks his back. It happens, & sometimes there’s just nothing the rider can do.
‘cataclysmic’ should have been ‘catastrophic’. I think I got a little carried away by the memory and mistyped. Probably either word would do, but somehow ‘catastrophic’ seems the more accurate term. Just because Miller made it look easy doesn’t mean it was. He could have ended up every bit as paralyzed as Reeve.
~ ~ ~ SPLAAAT ~ ~ ~
Mightn't solve the electrowhatsit, but given the daily news, it'll prolly lower your blood pressure regardless.
(don't worry about what anyone nearby thinks .. they'll forget about it sooner/later 8^)
You wouldn’t happent to have a good recipe for horse-meat hamburger, would you? Your recommendation for dry scalp treatment has worked wonders, btw. And who cares about the subject of the thread, anyway?
Do you believe that our own government was complicit in this?
Great about the scalp!
I don’t eat horses or cows or chickens or ducks or pigs, so can’t help with those recipes...
But I could give a great recipe for seitan! Or mung bean burgers, they’re actually very good.
No use, it has to be horse. I became quite nostalgic reading all about horsemanship on this thread. It reminded me of the time after WW2 when an American military truck killed a horse in the small village where I used to live. We were starving. The entire village shared the carcass. My aunt made rissoles. They tasted delicious. I haven’t eaten horsemeat since.
Notice the dripping sarcasm? During the early Terror Matrix threads, whenever the contributions were a little slow, freepers used to exchange recipes. I just wove the horse-meat into the scenario to be equally irritating. Yuck Yuck Yuck, says Curly.
The trouble with people like you who swallow the government lies and enjoy ridiculing those who don't is, you have such a limited concept of what 'the government' is! So you remain ignorant and comfy in the normalcy bias until it is too late to stop your nation's destruction. The issues are so much more complex than merely 'black or white, did the government do 911 or did they not?'
How would you process mentally the reality if your government had a weapon capable of dustifying the towers, which saved so much in the bargain? How would you process a reality where the decision to 'pull the towers' was done in an effort to save so much that was at great risk if the million tons fell into the bathtub and allowed the river to flood the tunnels and foundations of the trillions of dollars of structures, with their tens of thousands of occupants/workers/rescuers/ valuables?
Someone doesn't want you to think about that, so they give you baubles to play with, mentally. They feed you lines to recite in order to squelch discussion of what may have really happened and why. Comfy?
I need something stronger than flyswatters to make me feel better about socialist pukes!
I see.
There really is no difference morally between eating horse and eating cow; although according to the Vedas, eating horse is not quite as morally repugnant, since most humans do not drink horse milk, but most do drink cow’s milk.
If someone is starving, the rules change.
Yes, I remember recipe exchanges.
Interesting how diversions pop up.
Just poking them now & again can be v entertaining.
***We had dozens of those trolls admit they were doing it just because they found it entertaining. We called them entertainment trolls. I did not find this episode in american politics so entertaining. It was the end of our republic, having someone disqualified become our president.
The trolls I have poked didn’t enjoy it at all. They hated it, or at least acted as if they did.
I am no fan of trolls, believe me. But as long as they’re here, we might as well yank their chains every now and then, don’t you agree?
I have yanked the chains of dozens of CoLB trolls. They were allowed to break the rules of this forum but we weren’t. Why is it that JimRob told us to stop troll hunting but didn’t tell the trolls to stop trolling?
Agree w you totally & completely. Now that the trolls are losing their fear of banning they are becoming more bold. Bold for them means more obnoxious, more disruptive, more abusive, and even more open about their liberalism. How & why this is a good thing I couldn’t tell you. It seems like a bad thing to me, when conservatives are attacked, hounded, harassed & verbally abused on their own site.
As an aside, however, I do think the Foggers overplayed their hand, and some may come to regret it. Coming right out & praising ‘Bill’ [Clinton] (for example) on a conservative site really IS a bold move. It must have seemed like a good idea at the time, but it may yet come round to bite the Billaphile in the posterior.
There is another group on FR who act like trolls, though they are not liberals. These are the people who believe Stanley Ann is not the mother of the current occupant of the WH. Disagree w them, and you get verbally abused even worse than by a genuine liberal troll. They rely on the worst kind of bully/Alinsky tactics, & their goal is to drive true conservatives (who happen to believe Stanley Ann hatched Obama] off the site.
How is this good for FR? Is the new litmus test of conservatism believing that Stanley Ann is not BHO’s mother? If so, that should be posted. Something like, ‘If you come to this site, you must either believe Stanley Ann is not BHO’s mother or be prepared to be told to “eff off” & worse. Also know that you will be hounded by a pack of psycho-acting posters, and they will have free rein to attack you & lie about you to their hearts’ content.’
That is the way it works, so why not be honest about it? Though to be clear, I don’t think it should be that way. I think a certain level of jerkish behavior should be reined in regardless of who’s perpetrating it. The bottom line is that conservatives don’t/won’t flock to a site they think of as conservative only to be harassed & abused. Most, upon encountering this behavior, will go elsewhere. If the goal is to cull FR down to the smallest possible # of participants, all of whom believe Stanley Ann is not BHO’s mother, then the tactic is working beautifully. Otherwise it isn’t doing the overall site any good at all.
“They usually drop the cr*p and try to engage me in friendly discussion as soon as they find out I met his mother.”
So you actually met Stanley Ann? That’s pretty amazing. When did it happen? By what name was she introduced? What was your overall impression of her?
I agree w you, btw, about Obama’s Dunham family resemblance. The Dunhams had/have a very distinctive look. Not by any means attractive, but distinctive, and Obama has it too.
Now that the trolls are losing their fear of banning they are becoming more bold. Bold for them means more obnoxious, more disruptive, more abusive, and even more open about their liberalism. How & why this is a good thing I couldn’t tell you. It seems like a bad thing to me, when conservatives are attacked, hounded, harassed & verbally abused on their own site.
***I was saying exactly that kind of stuff 5 years ago. My current working theory is that the upper echelon of Freepdom has deemed that Certifigate is not to be taken seriously as a “real issue”. They allow these shenanigans because it is entertaining to them, it generates traffic flow to the site, and FR is basically at that point... an entertainment business.
How is this good for FR? Is the new litmus test of conservatism believing that Stanley Ann is not BHO’s mother? If so, that should be posted.
***Interesting. From my home page... (note my tagline at the time):
___________________________________________________________________
I would like to see an idealogy litmus matrix here on Free Republic, but when I proposed it to Jimrob, he called me a newbie.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2145065/posts?page=130#130
To: babygene I don’t think he’s all that interested.
To: MHGinTN It doesn’t matter what a FReeper thinks. It’s just a list that they tell us what they think. That way we can tell who we’re dealing with.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2145065/posts?page=130#130
To: Jim Robinson Hah hah, that’s great. I signed up 2 months after you and I’m a newbie. Back then no one even said, “Welcome to FR”. But yeah, I do think that there are tons of RINOs. To be more accurate, the term would be CINOs.
I’ve been pushing for an idealogical litmus matrix here on FR, not to get rid of RINOs but to expose them.
THE GOP DOESN’T WANT US- SO WHAT’S NEXT?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965735/posts?page=762#762
***It simply takes too long. Look at this thread alone. I see evidence of RINOism in some of the FReepers on this thread. It takes 700 posts to drill down. We need the matrix posted and available so that we don’t have to drill down on every FReeping thread. They’re wasting our time. Deliberately.
Agreed to a large degree. Perhaps a way to rate members by other members???
762 posted on Thursday, February 07, 2008 8:43:23 PM by roamer_1
130 posted on Monday, December 08, 2008 2:39:20 PM by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
49 posted on Monday, December 22, 2008 7:29:27 PM by Kevmo ( It’s all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies] 48 posted on Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:25:08 PM by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
___________________________________________________________________
“That way we can tell who we’re dealing with.”
Isn’t that the crux of the matter? Speaking of which, have you noticed how many known liberal trolls leave their profile page blank? They do not want us to know who we’re dealing with. In fact, everything they’re doing/trying to do depends on us NOT knowing.
As far as tests go, it wouldn’t have to be much of one. All you have to do, if you want to see a liberal troll melt down, is ask him to criticize Obama. They absolutely don’t want to undercut The Won. I’ll give them this: they really love their man.
Why they should be allowed to love him quite so much on a conservative site is another matter....
Why they should be allowed to love him quite so much on a conservative site is another matter....
***Well, if you figure out the solution, let me know.
You got it, my friend. Meanwhile, let’s keep those trolls on their toes. The more fun we have at their expense, the less fun they’ll have on FR. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.