DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible

Butterdezillion | Feb 23, 2010 | Butterdezillion

[butterdezillion]

I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".

The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:

In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.

MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).

There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).

There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.

[Natural Born 54]

Know what you mean. I’ve already been thru a large portion of it today and I really don’t want to go back again. Even to locate my posts from the thread searching just my comments is a major task.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

LOL, an uncompressed tif generally tops out above that. I have two that are close to 131,963 kb.

The photograph was taken with a Nikon CoolPix 990 with picture quality set on "HI." This produces an image that is 2048 x 1536 pixels and it saves the image as an uncompressed TIF file instead of a compressed JPG file. And in this case, the file size was 9.1MB.

I can't speak to anything more than the size of the file created by the camera.

[KenyanBCPunkster]

Yes I do. I do art on the side. Scanning in high quality leads to LARGE files.

It wasn't scanned. It is a digital photograph.

[Darksheare]

Quote for me the text of YOUR post 2497.

[Cicero]

Actually, at the time you are speaking of, when the original BC was tampered with at Orly’s site, there WAS malware that people were picking up, from leftist hackers presumably. I have protection for my computer, but no protection is foolproof.

Part of the problem was that Google was sending false warnings to people who visited the site, but John Robinson also said at the time, as I recall, that he found malware there.

[Darksheare]

If you want good quality, you scan it.
Digital camera leads to too many artifacts.

[Darksheare]

A 3.34 megapixel camera?
*snicker*

[DJ MacWoW]

It is. I’ve searched for stuff.

[Darksheare]

And how could it be on your site if it wasn’t on your computer?
Or are you lying about the whole e-mail thing?

[Las Vegas Ron]

PhotoBucket won't host TIF files, only JPEG files."

Then optimize it and change the format to a .jpg, you can do that can't you?

[Las Vegas Ron]

The only way I got a tif to be under 10,000 kb was to reduce the quality and compress it some.

Wiggy need to optimize it and change it to a .jpg

[EnderWiggins]

"But you said it was a quality image."

Yes, I did.

"How can it be a quality image then?"

By being the original uncompressed TIF right out of the camera.

"It can’t, as the starting image is too small for the purposes of the discussion."

Another deeply goofy assertion.

The simple fact that it is higher quality than any image released by Orly Taitz shows that it is closer to the source than Orly's is... at least "for the purposes of this discussion."

It is painful to have to hold your hands through an otherwise ordinary thought process.

Yet it's fun to see you guys scurrying around like little girls who just saw a spider.

[little jeremiah]

I freepmailed him a personal note with my inner feelings expressed.

Send him an email? hahahah!!!

[Darksheare]

You keep saying goofy assertion, but you don’t seem to know what it means.

[EnderWiggins]

"Wiggy need to optimize it and change it to a .jpg

I did that first. Post 2,434

But it's the original uncompressed TIF that proves it's the original source of Orly's photo. The jpeg can't do that.

[little jeremiah]

A LITTLE too coincendental?

[Las Vegas Ron]

Who cares if you trust me? You’re a Birther

And you're a troll, I'll take a "birther" over a troll anyday...post the pic wiggy

[Darksheare]

"It's not on my computer, poindexter"

Oh contraire.
"Via email."
"No idea. I've got a T-1 to the Internet, so probably not very long."
So.. it IS on your machine.
And, by the way liar, YOU most cvertainly DID say to download the probably poisoned tif image onto my machine.
YOUR post 2497: "Download it for yourself and look."

Liar.

[DJ MacWoW]

Wiggy will be off the clock soon.

[Darksheare]

Okay, so I’m understating a little.