******
Let's see what happens when document experts----pro-Obama experts, neutral experts, and anti-Obama experts---apply their technical skills to this document the way they applied their skills to the Obama Hawaii short form birth certificate that Obama displayed on his website.
The results should be most interesting.
If it turns out that the document is a fake, it looks like a pretty good fake to me.
The next few weeks could be most interesting as more and more people examine this Kenyan birth certificate.
In addition, this document could force Obama to release his Hawaii long form birth certificate and his Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard records and his Hawaii high school records.
I am a year older than Obama (although born in the U.S, myself).
If that’s a fake, it’s one heck of a fake. I have both a Certificate of Live Birth (with the weight, Dr. etc) and the Certification of Live Birth (which looks like the document Obama has presented).
Damn. I’m gonna see if I have any wine in this house. LOL
In addition, this document could force Obama to release his Hawaii long form birth certificate and his Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard records and his Hawaii high school records.
____________
you have a point there. It may shift the burden of proof to him. If the document is deemed to be real, I think it will force him to prove otherwise.
What actual "experts" ever examined Obama's alleged COLB?
I'll admit to missing a thread here and there on this issue, but it seems that that information would have stuck out in the conversations, since.
As far as I know, FactCheck.org were the only people who were allowed to look at the alleged paper copy of Obama's COLB, and they're not expert document examiners by any stretch.
Coupla things:
Is there a Joshua Simon Oduya who worked for the Kenyan Dept of Vital Stats in 1964?
Is there an E. F. Lavender who was the hospital registrar at Coast General Hospital in 1961?
Do the sequence numbers of the page and volume records of the original match those that would represent a birth on Aug 4th, 1961?
A hit on ANY of these items would be strong corroborating evidence. A hit on more than one, or possibly all three, seems to me to make it almost a certainty.
Remember, the only documents we have seen from Hawaii make no mention at all of what hospital, name of the registrar or attending physician, nothing. Just that he was born on Aug 4th, 1961
There’s some kind of brownish smudge on it.
It looks like an authentic cigarette ash burn, right by what I think says “Maiden Surname”.