Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Or she had a looooong labor or some other complication.
She is not beyond being duped. Either these documents are real or they are forged.That’s the 2 choices , if they are not real then she has been duped into thinking they are. Simple.
Very helpful information.
The new document released by Taitz bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax.
Same here — everytime I go do something else I come back and I am way behind again. I didn’t read the center part either as it is moving so fast.
Good post!
You wrote-
“Read it again. This copy states the birth was registered Aug. 5, 1961 (the day after Hussein was born) and was filed into the record books Aug. 9th.
Ann filed for divorce in Jan. ‘64 and it was finalized Mar. ‘64. It makes sense Ann or Sr. or the court needed to verify Hussein as their kid so obtained this copy in Feb. ‘64.”
You said:
“If (and that’s a big if) the document is authentic”
Since you need my opinion. I will say that the document is authentic.
Good-bye Barry. Hardly even knew ya!
TheBigIf has spoken. lol.
I think his name is Phillip Berg. And the Clintons are amateurs compared to Soros and the Chicago machine.
Nope. That's not the original FactChuck image, the one with the serial number blanked out.
That is an image of a printout of an image of a computer generated form.
One that was made specifically to show things that Polarik pointed out were not even in the original flat high resolution FactChuck image.
In other words, FactChuck degraded the original image below the quality needed to discern fine detail such as the embossed seal, produced a new fake document with the missing details added, photographed it under non-uniform lighting, at odd angles and folded to prevent comparisons to the original forgery.
Color me skeptical...
I think you are correct, if memory serves. A number of British colonies in Africa were granted independence from 1957-1963, almost according to a schedule. Kenya was a little behind the others, possibly because of political unrest during the ‘50’s.
Drudge never does anything on Sunday.
Of course it’s speculation. This is all speculation. I simply asked a question about something that doesn’t make sense to me. Leaving aside the very big issue of taking an international flight of many hours duration while very pregnant. In 1961. That also makes no sense to me.
Thank you.
Hey guys, I just got out of the shower and...WHAT?!?
My next question is who is authorized to arrest a fraud occupying the White House and would they do it?
Someone pointed that out to me....threw up a little in my mouth. Evil knows no bounds, does it.
God bless WND. I heard Boortz savage them over this issue, bringing up wild conspiracy theories and trying to make them sound like WND reported them when they didn’t. Sure, they might quote other news sources on some other stuff, but that’s all it is — a quote. For crying out loud, maybe WND just likes people to see how people in other countries think. Motivation shouldn’t matter if a quote is correct — truth is truth, no matter how way out it sounds. The day WND actually gets a story wrong, that’s the day Boortz should have his fun.
By 4am my time there were 9000+views... Now what is it? 46k!!!!! Wow.
I’ve noticed that. Drudge usually takes the weekend off.
We’ve checked DU—they just think that Orly is taking everybody for a ride.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.