Posted on 02/02/2007 4:47:11 PM PST by PhiKapMom
narses also posted private Freepmail on this thread.
They post the same thing more than once on a thread which is okay but someone tries to have a little fun and they go whining. Amazing! Hope they never get in a real campaign where the fur is flying right and left.
I tried that, it doesn't work. The desperate housewives of FR are OUT OF CONTROL!
Fair enough. But may I ask, is the policy reciprocal? In other words, If I ask a poster NOT to post to me, will I get the same respect? I'm happy NOT to be posted to or post to Howlin and there are others I am willing to add to that list. But will the rules be applied in both directions?
I hadn't realized until recently that posting spam is now okay. We should try it. Maybe some of the positive Rudy articles and conservative groups that support him should be posted every new page.
..I just wish to heck that everyone could learn how to point-counterpoint without dipping into the personal attacks--and I mean this for some oldtimers too--man! the Caucuses aren't until NEXT JANUARY!
Which indicated that you abused freepmail rules by saying stuff on freepmail that should not be said on the open forum.
I would really suggest that narses not post to you. I will not post to you again unless the subject directly involves you, as I have done here. And you not post to me again. The mods have their hands full without dealing with our various emotional deficiencies.
It's not the Admin Moderator's fault that those very same "desperate housewives" beat you like a circus monkey.
You have and always have had issues with women.
Uh? Who you? I've tried to get us to respectfully disagree many times but you've never done it. Practice what you preach!
"narses also posted private Freepmail on this thread."
Indeed I did. From the Admin Moderator telling me that I could NOT instruct people to stop pinging me.
Oh, and did you see the class act? The admin mod asks people not to call names and we already have a name caller.
It's sad really, how some people just can't seem to help themselves.
anyone who wants to try and run is free to do so.
but electability in the general election is a factor alot of republicans are interested in. they don't want to send up some litmus test pure candidate, who can't win. the base can't elect anyone on their own, that doesn't mean they aren't important - but to the exclusion of sufficient independents, the base can't win it on their own. they couldn't save Talent and Allen and Santorum in 2006.
the party has done a poor job developing conservative candidates, who can bring a convincing message and communication skills to sway voters. I wish it were different, but it isn't.
It's not against forum rules to say snotty things in Freepmail; if it was, most of you all would have been banned by now.
No, you posted what I wrote to you in Freepmail after YOU sent me a Freepmail I didn't want.
That's against forum rules, bud.
I'm reading every comment, except SPAM.
I beg to differ. I have always understood that you cannot say in freepmail what cannot be said under open forum guidelines regarding profanity and personal attacks.
AM, perhaps you could clarify, since the subject has been broached.
It really irritates me to have to be explaining common courtesy that should be observed in every day life by most adults to Freepers. We really are better than this.
Tonights mod is being very generous with all the slinging going on!
Ditto that.
Oh, and I goofed. Reagan didn't sign gun legislation. He just lobbied for it. LOL
As a late convert, Ronald Reagan preached for federal handgun
control with the fervor of a new believer. But one day of lobbying
after 10 years doesn't markedly alter the prospects for changing
the law.
A decade ago, it might have been different.
A new president recovering from the bullet wounds of an
assassination attempt might have been able to press Congress to action on handgun controls. But the Reagan of 1981 opposed national gun control legislation, calling it a diversion from real action to combat crime.
Reagan last week declared his support for a bill requiring a
seven-day waiting period for handgun purchases. He did so at a George Washington University ceremony marking the 10th anniversary of the shooting that almost killed him and permanently disabled his press secretary, James S. Brady.
http://www.totse.com/en/politics/right_to_keep_and_bear_arms/ronshelp.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.