This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Enough noise from this damn thing. |
Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7
Im happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)
(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
Conclusion
In conclusion, our genus Homo appears to have been intelligently designed and is not connected to the australopithecine apes or any other apes through ancestry:
1. The alleged australopithecine ancestors are very different from the earliest members of Homo,
2. Homo appears suddenly and distinct, without transitions in the fossil record from any earlier forms, and
3. Subsequent forms of Homo are variants of and very similar to the initial forms of Homo.
Figure 9. A) An approximation of a common hominid phylogeny or family tree, under an evolutionary perspective. Adapted from reference 8. Many hominid phylogenies place Australopithecus afarensis arising from the hominid Ardipithicus ramidus a little over 4 million years ago. B) Hominid phylogeny under intelligent design, reflecting basic types among hominids. Basic type Homo is unrelated to basic type Australopithecus. Dates have been left off to illustrate only lines of ancestry.
http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1146
Humans were and always have been humans.
I apologize. It was the impression you gave us on previous threads.
lol
Mamzelle's on my virtual ignore list. I don't speak to people who are pathologically bitter.
See #225.
you can believe all the junk science you want. global warming, Evo. space aliens, Xenu. I don't care.
It's also utterly juvenile--something an insecure adolescent male would do when he feels threatened by someone who happens to be female. "Fading looks"--Gee, is that supposed to be so devastating? Scientific?
Ann is a much better writer than public personality. "Treason" was particularly good.
Don't you think this "virtual ignore" stuff is a beta male attribute? Why can't someone just ignore someone? Why do they need a mod to do their ignoring for them?
Read Later Placemarker
Your arguments are refuted continually.
The "Darwinist Imams" smear was a childish insult.
Australopithecus afarensis |
Homo Habilis |
I see the wisdom in your approach.
Uh-Oh! Looks some some people will now be trying to get Ann banned at FreeRepublic!
I thought it pretty much refuted your arguments.
You cannot be that dense (what am I saying?). The point they were making is that her looks are the only reason anyone listens to her. That's not mysogyny. Mysogyny is the hatred of women in general. Disliking one woman in particular in no way even equates to mysogyny.
"Virtual Ignore" does not require moderator intervention.
Well what are they? I know its some sort of cult.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.