You know, you almost have me convinced.
Basically you're saying that a person who is breaching the peace and engaging in offensive and passive-agressive behavior (though not directly harming others through force or fraud), should be allowed to engage in that activity.
I got that right?
I hope that he's not going to try to draw parallels between a pot mural and an exposed penis a few feet from a teenage girl in a public setting.
But in reality, that is EXACTLY what I hope he's going to do!
I reject your characterization of his behavior. Painting marijuana leaves on your own house does not breach the peace and is not passive-aggressive.
Your post breached the peace...and since it doesn't answer your question without explicitly refusing to do so, this post is passive-aggressive.
"you're saying that a person who is breaching the peace and engaging in offensive and passive-agressive behavior...should be allowed to engage in that activity".
Where does the article say anyone engaged in breaching the peace? Where does any post say that a person breaching the peace "should be allowed to engage in that activity"?
Show me. Show all of us.
You are the most delusional character on FR. Have you ever been hospitalized for psychiatric disorders?