Posted on 03/17/2006 2:13:06 AM PST by freepatriot32
WINSTED, Conn. - Having marijuana in your house is illegal, but having marijuana images on your house is not, according to town officials.
Five months after Christopher Seekins was arrested and charged with cultivating marijuana in his home, neighbors have complained about the giant marijuana leaves he has spray-painted on the outside of his home on High Street.
"There's no reason anybody should have a problem with it," Seekins said Wednesday.
Town officials said the marijuana paintings apparently do not conflict with local laws.
"There's nothing in the property maintenance code that deals with writing on your house," Joe Beadle, chief code enforcement officer, said.
Seekins says the large leaves are in support of the cause of the legalization of marijuana. He believes firmly in the usefulness of hemp, the coarse fiber of the cannabis plant, from textiles to paper products.
"People have the wrong impression about it," Seekins said.
In October, police said they found 100 plants inside Seekins' house, along with grow lights, fertilizers and portable heaters.
Police charged Seekins, 26, with cultivating marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. Free on $10,000 bond, his court case is pending.
___
Information from: Republican-American, http://www.rep-am.com
What is a niave drug warrior? I want to know if I am one.
I hope that he's not going to try to draw parallels between a pot mural and an exposed penis a few feet from a teenage girl in a public setting.
But in reality, that is EXACTLY what I hope he's going to do!
I reject your characterization of his behavior. Painting marijuana leaves on your own house does not breach the peace and is not passive-aggressive.
Your post breached the peace...and since it doesn't answer your question without explicitly refusing to do so, this post is passive-aggressive.
"you're saying that a person who is breaching the peace and engaging in offensive and passive-agressive behavior...should be allowed to engage in that activity".
Where does the article say anyone engaged in breaching the peace? Where does any post say that a person breaching the peace "should be allowed to engage in that activity"?
Show me. Show all of us.
You are the most delusional character on FR. Have you ever been hospitalized for psychiatric disorders?
At least since CJ, KC, Roscoe, and TA79 left. Or got banned. Or whatever.
"Why does anybody bother to reply to robertpaulsen"?
I've told him several times to crawl back under his rock and leave the rest of us alone, but he doesn't listen.
We don't have time for that.
We're too busy looking at child porn and plotting the overthrow of the government.
Priorities man, priorities!
He's more accustomed to the picture and video females online, if you know what I mean.
Because we need target practice. Paulsen is the male version of MurryMom.
You tell me.
No, you tell me. you brought it up. I don't know what a NIAVE drug warrior is.
What's happens after you tell them you're a libertarian?
This makes the 3rd or 4th time you've mentioned the fact that the individual was a teenage girl. Is this important to your argument? Are you saying that you would feel differently about the incident if it involved a middle-aged woman?
The exceptionally attractive woman at the party last night was quite impressed. Yes, I'm serious.
robertpaulsen
Is that guy still around?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.