A first amendment right to breach the peace, offend others in the community, and engage in passive-aggressive behavior that is disturbing to others?
Gee, mugs99, now that you point that out, maybe you're right. I mean, no one was harmed. And he really didn't use force or fraud on another person. Hmmmm.
So, you're saying that even though an individual engages in behavior that results in a breach of the peace, offends others in the community, and engages in passive-aggressive behavior that is disturbing to others, that behavior should be allowed, nay protected, as a first amendment right to free expression?
Are you sure about that? "Cause I got a surprise ....