Skip to comments.
Town: Pot Paintings on House Not Illegal
http://www.comcast.net/news/strange ^
| 3 16 06
| Associated Press
Posted on 03/17/2006 2:13:06 AM PST by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: rhombus
What is a niave drug warrior? I want to know if I am one.
To: Physicist; tpaine; robertpaulsen
I hope that he's not going to try to draw parallels between a pot mural and an exposed penis a few feet from a teenage girl in a public setting.
But in reality, that is EXACTLY what I hope he's going to do!
22
posted on
03/17/2006 6:14:21 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
To: robertpaulsen
Stupid yes, threatening no.It's like these kids that ride around with clever stickers on thier cars like bong,high,420,still not sure how that became a synonym for Marijuana, and of course AZHIAZIAM which means literally "as high as I am".Then they get mad when the police pull them over, search their car, find their stash and arrest them DUH The stupidest yet though is the "bad cop no donut", might as well say "I'm not paying enough for insurance please give me a ticket."
23
posted on
03/17/2006 6:23:40 AM PST
by
edchambers
(Neocon foot-soldier of the Haliburton death squad)
To: robertpaulsen
Basically you're saying that a person who is breaching the peace and engaging in offensive and passive-agressive behaviorI reject your characterization of his behavior. Painting marijuana leaves on your own house does not breach the peace and is not passive-aggressive.
Your post breached the peace...and since it doesn't answer your question without explicitly refusing to do so, this post is passive-aggressive.
To: winston2
"This guy is so-ooooo cool!"
He's an idiot. He's pretty much throwing his chances of getting a good deal from prosecutors or a light sentence from the judge out the window and he's virtually ensuring that police in his town are going to ride him hard as long as he lives there.
25
posted on
03/17/2006 7:44:42 AM PST
by
TKDietz
To: robertpaulsen
"you're saying that a person who is breaching the peace and engaging in offensive and passive-agressive behavior...should be allowed to engage in that activity".
Where does the article say anyone engaged in breaching the peace? Where does any post say that a person breaching the peace "should be allowed to engage in that activity"?
Show me. Show all of us.
You are the most delusional character on FR. Have you ever been hospitalized for psychiatric disorders?
26
posted on
03/17/2006 8:03:06 AM PST
by
Supernatural
(When they come a wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
To: ConTex
I think the same way about people who wear hats with Budweiser on it.
27
posted on
03/17/2006 8:11:10 AM PST
by
commonerX
(n)
To: Physicist
Why does anybody bother to reply to robertpaulsen?
He is just playing games.
Ignore him and maybe he'll go away or at least make him irrelevant.
28
posted on
03/17/2006 8:22:25 AM PST
by
commonerX
(n)
To: Supernatural
You are the most delusional character on FR.At least since CJ, KC, Roscoe, and TA79 left. Or got banned. Or whatever.
29
posted on
03/17/2006 9:36:46 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
To: commonerX
"Why does anybody bother to reply to robertpaulsen"?
I've told him several times to crawl back under his rock and leave the rest of us alone, but he doesn't listen.
30
posted on
03/17/2006 9:42:04 AM PST
by
Supernatural
(When they come a wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
To: robertpaulsen
I'm confident that the libertarians on this forum will condemn his action and call for the full coercive force of the state to put a stop to this
LOL!
Use force to stop his 1st amendment right?
.
31
posted on
03/17/2006 9:53:50 AM PST
by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: robertpaulsen
I'm confident that the libertarians on this forum will condemn his action and call for the full coercive force of the state to put a stop to this. We don't have time for that.
We're too busy looking at child porn and plotting the overthrow of the government.
Priorities man, priorities!
To: Eagle Eye
Try striking up a conversation with a flesh and blood female. He's more accustomed to the picture and video females online, if you know what I mean.
To: commonerX
Why does anybody bother to reply to robertpaulsen Because we need target practice. Paulsen is the male version of MurryMom.
To: shelterguy
35
posted on
03/17/2006 10:05:16 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: rhombus
No, you tell me. you brought it up. I don't know what a NIAVE drug warrior is.
To: Eagle Eye
"You'd be surprised at how women are attracted to men who revere freedom, liberty, the Second Amendment and who aren't trying to play nanny to other people and takes care of his own business."What's happens after you tell them you're a libertarian?
To: Eagle Eye
"... few feet from a teenage girl"This makes the 3rd or 4th time you've mentioned the fact that the individual was a teenage girl. Is this important to your argument? Are you saying that you would feel differently about the incident if it involved a middle-aged woman?
To: robertpaulsen
What's happens after you tell them you're a libertarian? The exceptionally attractive woman at the party last night was quite impressed. Yes, I'm serious.
To: commonerX
robertpaulsen
Is that guy still around?
40
posted on
03/17/2006 10:30:44 AM PST
by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson