To: Alter Kaker
Because evolution is the only scientificly proven "theory" about the existence ofthe universe.
I always thought we are told to be tolerant of other peoples beliefs and their world views. All are equal unless it involves God.
22 posted on
12/20/2005 8:06:29 AM PST by
laxin4him
(They will know by our love not our picket lines)
To: laxin4him
Because evolution is the only scientificly proven "theory" about the existence ofthe universe. Correct.
I always thought we are told to be tolerant of other peoples beliefs and their world views. All are equal unless it involves God.
I'm not saying we shouldn't be respectful of creation accounts, but we can be respectful without teaching them in science class.
26 posted on
12/20/2005 8:09:27 AM PST by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: laxin4him
scientificly proven "theory" Oxymoron Alert!
No such thing. If it's proven then it's not a theory. If it's a theory it's not yet proven.
Evolution is the only government approved religion.
To: laxin4him
Uh...if it's a theory, it is, by definition, not proven.
347 posted on
12/20/2005 10:02:28 AM PST by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: laxin4him
Because evolution is the only scientificly proven "theory" about the existence ofthe universe.
____It has not been proven, it is an unprovable hypothesis..intelligent design is not necessarily a religious concept and evidence can be brought forth to show that there is a rational order to the universe without bringing in religion
To: laxin4him
"Because evolution is the only scientificly proven "theory" about the existence ofthe universe"
Scientifically proven theory??? That doesn't even make sense. Theories are "possibilities" not proven fact.
510 posted on
12/20/2005 10:55:55 AM PST by
jackv
(just shakin' my head)
To: laxin4him
"Because evolution is the only [scientificly] proven "theory" about the existence ofthe universe."
Darwin is still a theory. It is not scientific fact. There are major gaps in the fossil record. Which record is the foundation of the theory. Therefore a fact is that gaps exist. Are there other explanations that contain gaps? Yes, Intelligent Design. So why does one find favor and the other is found faulty?
Again, Darwin's theory has major flaws. Do you know how many days are devoted to it in Dover science classes versus the proposed addition of the Intelligent Design curriculum? If you knew you would correct your uninformed statements.
1,327 posted on
12/20/2005 4:28:08 PM PST by
Ceewrighter
(O'er the land of the free and the Home of the brave!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson